104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31133530)
41. A guideline for the outpatient management of glycaemic control in people with cancer.
Joharatnam-Hogan N; Chambers P; Dhatariya K; Board R;
Diabet Med; 2022 Jan; 39(1):e14636. PubMed ID: 34240470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Lessons learnt from the variation across 6741 family/general practices in England in the use of treatments for hypogonadism.
Heald AH; Stedman M; Whyte M; Livingston M; Albanese M; Ramachandran S; Hackett G
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf); 2021 May; 94(5):827-836. PubMed ID: 33420743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The pharmaceutical care of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Borges AP; Guidoni CM; Ferreira LD; de Freitas O; Pereira LR
Pharm World Sci; 2010 Dec; 32(6):730-6. PubMed ID: 20734138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Patients' experiences of the choice of GP practice pilot, 2012/2013: a mixed methods evaluation.
Tan S; Erens B; Wright M; Mays N
BMJ Open; 2015 Feb; 5(2):e006090. PubMed ID: 25667149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Impact of primary care funding on patient satisfaction: a retrospective longitudinal study of English general practice, 2013-2016.
L'Esperance V; Gravelle H; Schofield P; Ashworth M
Br J Gen Pract; 2021 Jan; 71(702):e47-e54. PubMed ID: 33257459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Weekend opening in primary care: analysis of the General Practice Patient Survey.
Ford JA; Jones AP; Wong G; Steel N
Br J Gen Pract; 2015 Dec; 65(641):e792-8. PubMed ID: 26541181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Are the needs of people with multiple long-term conditions being met? Evidence from the 2018 General Practice Patient Survey.
Rolewicz L; Keeble E; Paddison C; Scobie S
BMJ Open; 2020 Nov; 10(11):e041569. PubMed ID: 33191268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Determinants of poor glycaemic control and proteinuria in patients with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective analysis of general practice records in Ireland.
Sullivan M; O'Connor R; Hannigan A
BMC Prim Care; 2024 Jan; 25(1):22. PubMed ID: 38200427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A study of patient expectations in a Norfolk general practice.
Kenten C; Bowling A; Lambert N; Howe A; Rowe G
Health Expect; 2010 Sep; 13(3):273-84. PubMed ID: 20550590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Changes in health care utilisation following a reform involving choice and privatisation in Swedish primary care: a five-year follow-up of GP-visits.
Beckman A; Anell A
BMC Health Serv Res; 2013 Oct; 13():452. PubMed ID: 24171894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Measuring continuity of care in general practice: a comparison of two methods using routinely collected data.
Hull SA; Williams C; Schofield P; Boomla K; Ashworth M
Br J Gen Pract; 2022 Nov; 72(724):e773-e779. PubMed ID: 35995578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Relationship between clinical quality and patient experience: analysis of data from the english quality and outcomes framework and the National GP Patient Survey.
Llanwarne NR; Abel GA; Elliott MN; Paddison CA; Lyratzopoulos G; Campbell JL; Roland M
Ann Fam Med; 2013; 11(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 24019279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Care of type 2 diabetes in unresourced general practice: current practice in the Mid-West.
O'Connor R; Mannix M; Cullen W; Mullen J; Healy M; Saunders J; Griffin M; O'Sullivan G
Ir Med J; 2014 Feb; 107(2):43-5. PubMed ID: 24654481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Soft governance, restratification and the 2004 general medical services contract: the case of UK primary care organisations and general practice teams.
Grant S; Ring A; Gabbay M; Guthrie B; McLean G; Mair FS; Watt G; Heaney D; O'Donnell C
Sociol Health Illn; 2015 Jan; 37(1):30-51. PubMed ID: 25601063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Ethnic inequalities in patient satisfaction with primary health care in England: Evidence from recent General Practitioner Patient Surveys (GPPS).
Magadi JP; Magadi MA
PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0270775. PubMed ID: 36542601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Evaluating tools to support a new practical classification of diabetes: excellent control may represent misdiagnosis and omission from disease registers is associated with worse control.
Hassan Sadek N; Sadek AR; Tahir A; Khunti K; Desombre T; de Lusignan S
Int J Clin Pract; 2012 Sep; 66(9):874-82. PubMed ID: 22784308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. How widespread is working at scale in English general practice? An observational study.
Forbes LJ; Forbes H; Sutton M; Checkland K; Peckham S
Br J Gen Pract; 2019 Oct; 69(687):e682-e688. PubMed ID: 31501167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Care plans and care planning in the management of long-term conditions in the UK: a controlled prospective cohort study.
Reeves D; Hann M; Rick J; Rowe K; Small N; Burt J; Roland M; Protheroe J; Blakeman T; Richardson G; Kennedy A; Bower P
Br J Gen Pract; 2014 Sep; 64(626):e568-75. PubMed ID: 25179071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Diabetes care provision in UK primary care practices.
Hawthorne G; Hrisos S; Stamp E; Elovainio M; Francis JJ; Grimshaw JM; Hunter M; Johnston M; Presseau J; Steen N; Eccles MP
PLoS One; 2012; 7(7):e41562. PubMed ID: 22859997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The perspectives of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on marketing mix elements in primary health care: a quantitative study from Lithuania.
Budrevičiūtė A; Kalėdienė R; Paukštaitienė R; Bagdonienė L; Stankūnas M; Valius L
Prim Health Care Res Dev; 2021 Jan; 22():e1. PubMed ID: 33504395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
