These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31134333)

  • 1. Epidemiology, genetic epidemiology and Mendelian randomisation: more need than ever to attend to detail.
    Sheehan NA; Didelez V
    Hum Genet; 2020 Jan; 139(1):121-136. PubMed ID: 31134333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mendelian randomisation: a tool for assessing causality in observational epidemiology.
    Sheehan NA; Meng S; Didelez V
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 713():153-66. PubMed ID: 21153618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mendelian randomisation for mediation analysis: current methods and challenges for implementation.
    Carter AR; Sanderson E; Hammerton G; Richmond RC; Davey Smith G; Heron J; Taylor AE; Davies NM; Howe LD
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2021 May; 36(5):465-478. PubMed ID: 33961203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Causal graphs for the analysis of genetic cohort data.
    Hines O; Diaz-Ordaz K; Vansteelandt S; Jamshidi Y
    Physiol Genomics; 2020 Sep; 52(9):369-378. PubMed ID: 32687429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression.
    Bowden J; Davey Smith G; Burgess S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):512-25. PubMed ID: 26050253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the current state of Mendelian randomization studies: a protocol for a systematic review on methodological and clinical aspects using neurodegenerative disorders as outcome.
    Grover S; Del Greco M F; König IR
    Syst Rev; 2018 Sep; 7(1):145. PubMed ID: 30249280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selecting instruments for Mendelian randomization in the wake of genome-wide association studies.
    Swerdlow DI; Kuchenbaecker KB; Shah S; Sofat R; Holmes MV; White J; Mindell JS; Kivimaki M; Brunner EJ; Whittaker JC; Casas JP; Hingorani AD
    Int J Epidemiol; 2016 Oct; 45(5):1600-1616. PubMed ID: 27342221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Association of maternal circulating 25(OH)D and calcium with birth weight: A mendelian randomisation analysis.
    Thompson WD; Tyrrell J; Borges MC; Beaumont RN; Knight BA; Wood AR; Ring SM; Hattersley AT; Freathy RM; Lawlor DA
    PLoS Med; 2019 Jun; 16(6):e1002828. PubMed ID: 31211782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 'Mendelian randomization': an approach for exploring causal relations in epidemiology.
    Gupta V; Walia GK; Sachdeva MP
    Public Health; 2017 Apr; 145():113-119. PubMed ID: 28359378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitivity Analyses for Robust Causal Inference from Mendelian Randomization Analyses with Multiple Genetic Variants.
    Burgess S; Bowden J; Fall T; Ingelsson E; Thompson SG
    Epidemiology; 2017 Jan; 28(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 27749700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic instrumental variable analysis: time to call mendelian randomization what it is. The example of alcohol and cardiovascular disease.
    Mukamal KJ; Stampfer MJ; Rimm EB
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2020 Feb; 35(2):93-97. PubMed ID: 31761964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Extending Causality Tests with Genetic Instruments: An Integration of Mendelian Randomization with the Classical Twin Design.
    Minică CC; Dolan CV; Boomsma DI; de Geus E; Neale MC
    Behav Genet; 2018 Jul; 48(4):337-349. PubMed ID: 29882082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Causal inference on neuroimaging data with Mendelian randomisation.
    Taschler B; Smith SM; Nichols TE
    Neuroimage; 2022 Sep; 258():119385. PubMed ID: 35714886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Meta-analysis and Mendelian randomization: A review.
    Bowden J; Holmes MV
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Dec; 10(4):486-496. PubMed ID: 30861319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nonparametric bounds in two-sample summary-data Mendelian randomization: Some cautionary tales for practice.
    Trane RM; Kang H
    Stat Med; 2022 Jun; 41(14):2523-2541. PubMed ID: 35355302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inferring the direction of a causal link and estimating its effect via a Bayesian Mendelian randomization approach.
    Bucur IG; Claassen T; Heskes T
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Apr; 29(4):1081-1111. PubMed ID: 31146640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mendelian Randomization.
    Grover S; Del Greco M F; Stein CM; Ziegler A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1666():581-628. PubMed ID: 28980266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understanding the assumptions underlying Mendelian randomization.
    de Leeuw C; Savage J; Bucur IG; Heskes T; Posthuma D
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2022 Jun; 30(6):653-660. PubMed ID: 35082398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving the accuracy of two-sample summary-data Mendelian randomization: moving beyond the NOME assumption.
    Bowden J; Del Greco M F; Minelli C; Zhao Q; Lawlor DA; Sheehan NA; Thompson J; Davey Smith G
    Int J Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 48(3):728-742. PubMed ID: 30561657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Partial Identification of the Average Causal Effect in Multiple Study Populations: The Challenge of Combining Mendelian Randomization Studies.
    Diemer EW; Zuccolo L; Swanson SA
    Epidemiology; 2023 Jan; 34(1):20-28. PubMed ID: 35944150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.