These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31134664)

  • 1. Participants' outcomes gone missing within a network of interventions: Bayesian modeling strategies.
    Spineli LM; Kalyvas C; Pateras K
    Stat Med; 2019 Sep; 38(20):3861-3879. PubMed ID: 31134664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An empirical comparison of Bayesian modelling strategies for missing binary outcome data in network meta-analysis.
    Spineli LM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):86. PubMed ID: 31018836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of exclusion, imputation and modelling of missing binary outcome data in frequentist network meta-analysis.
    Spineli LM; Kalyvas C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Feb; 20(1):48. PubMed ID: 32111167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pattern-mixture model in network meta-analysis of binary missing outcome data: one-stage or two-stage approach?
    Spineli LM; Papadimitropoulou K; Kalyvas C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Jan; 21(1):12. PubMed ID: 33413138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the impact of imputations for missing participant outcome data in a network meta-analysis.
    Spineli LM; Higgins JP; Cipriani A; Leucht S; Salanti G
    Clin Trials; 2013; 10(3):378-88. PubMed ID: 23321265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Continuous(ly) missing outcome data in network meta-analysis: A one-stage pattern-mixture model approach.
    Spineli LM; Kalyvas C; Papadimitropoulou K
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Apr; 30(4):958-975. PubMed ID: 33406990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Allowing for uncertainty due to missing data in meta-analysis--part 1: two-stage methods.
    White IR; Higgins JP; Wood AM
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(5):711-27. PubMed ID: 17703496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modeling missing binary outcome data while preserving transitivity assumption yielded more credible network meta-analysis results.
    Spineli LM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 105():19-26. PubMed ID: 30223064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of covariance priors on arm-based Bayesian network meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
    Wang Z; Lin L; Hodges JS; Chu H
    Stat Med; 2020 Sep; 39(22):2883-2900. PubMed ID: 32495349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Potential impact of missing outcome data on treatment effects in systematic reviews: imputation study.
    Kahale LA; Khamis AM; Diab B; Chang Y; Lopes LC; Agarwal A; Li L; Mustafa RA; Koujanian S; Waziry R; Busse JW; Dakik A; Schünemann HJ; Hooft L; Scholten RJ; Guyatt GH; Akl EA
    BMJ; 2020 Aug; 370():m2898. PubMed ID: 32847800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How robust are findings of pairwise and network meta-analysis in the presence of missing participant outcome data?
    Spineli LM; Kalyvas C; Papadimitropoulou K
    BMC Med; 2021 Dec; 19(1):323. PubMed ID: 34930276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Degree irregularity and rank probability bias in network meta-analysis.
    Davies AL; Galla T
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 May; 12(3):316-332. PubMed ID: 32935913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostics for generalized linear hierarchical models in network meta-analysis.
    Zhao H; Hodges JS; Carlin BP
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Sep; 8(3):333-342. PubMed ID: 28683516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Allowing for uncertainty due to missing data in meta-analysis--part 2: hierarchical models.
    White IR; Welton NJ; Wood AM; Ades AE; Higgins JP
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(5):728-45. PubMed ID: 17703502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When does the use of individual patient data in network meta-analysis make a difference? A simulation study.
    Kanters S; Karim ME; Thorlund K; Anis A; Bansback N
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Jan; 21(1):21. PubMed ID: 33435879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multivariate network meta-analysis incorporating class effects.
    Owen RK; Bujkiewicz S; Tincello DG; Abrams KR
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):184. PubMed ID: 32641105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dealing with missing outcome data in meta-analysis.
    Mavridis D; White IR
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Jan; 11(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 30991455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prior Choices of Between-Study Heterogeneity in Contemporary Bayesian Network Meta-analyses: an Empirical Study.
    Rosenberger KJ; Xing A; Murad MH; Chu H; Lin L
    J Gen Intern Med; 2021 Apr; 36(4):1049-1057. PubMed ID: 33403620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hierarchical Bayesian approaches for detecting inconsistency in network meta-analysis.
    Zhao H; Hodges JS; Ma H; Jiang Q; Carlin BP
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(20):3524-36. PubMed ID: 27037506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.