These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31134743)

  • 1. Assessing patient satisfaction among ABHRS surgeons: Opportunities to improve.
    Hakimi AA; Yasmeh JP; Foulad DS
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2020 Feb; 19(2):462-465. PubMed ID: 31134743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Online Patient Ratings of Hand Surgeons.
    Trehan SK; DeFrancesco CJ; Nguyen JT; Charalel RA; Daluiski A
    J Hand Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 41(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 26710742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How do physician demographics, training, social media usage, online presence, and wait times influence online physician review scores for spine surgeons?
    Donnally CJ; McCormick JR; Li DJ; Maguire JA; Barker GP; Rush AJ; Wang MY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Feb; 30(2):279-288. PubMed ID: 30497169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of Surgeon Gender on Online Physician Reviews.
    Marrero K; King E; Fingeret AL
    J Surg Res; 2020 Jan; 245():510-515. PubMed ID: 31446193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Online ratings of orthopedic surgeons: analysis of 2185 reviews.
    Bakhsh W; Mesfin A
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2014 Aug; 43(8):359-63. PubMed ID: 25136868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How social media, training, and demographics influence online reviews across three leading review websites for spine surgeons.
    Donnally CJ; Li DJ; Maguire JA; Roth ES; Barker GP; McCormick JR; Rush AJ; Lebwohl NH
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):2081-2090. PubMed ID: 29709552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Online Ratings and Perceptions of Pediatric Otolaryngologists.
    Chua JT; Nguyen E; Risbud A; Soltanzadeh-Zarandi S; Lee A; Jamshidi S; Bayginejad S; Abouzari M
    Laryngoscope; 2021 Oct; 131(10):2356-2360. PubMed ID: 33625763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictive factors of positive online patient ratings of spine surgeons.
    Kalagara S; Eltorai AEM; DePasse JM; Daniels AH
    Spine J; 2019 Jan; 19(1):182-185. PubMed ID: 30077043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Happy and Unhappy Patients: A Quantitative Analysis of Online Plastic Surgeon Reviews for Breast Augmentation.
    Dorfman RG; Purnell C; Qiu C; Ellis MF; Basu CB; Kim JYS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 May; 141(5):663e-673e. PubMed ID: 29697608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Online Ratings of Facial Plastic Surgeons: Worthwhile Additions to Conventional Patient Experience Surveys.
    Bovenzi CD; Manges KA; Krein H; Heffelfinger R
    Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med; 2021; 23(2):78-89. PubMed ID: 32716653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient Reviews: Yelp, Google, Healthgrades, Vitals, and RealSelf.
    Furnas HJ; Korman JM; Canales FL; Pence LD
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Dec; 146(6):1419-1431. PubMed ID: 33234982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Online Physician Reviews in Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery: What Do Patients Really Want?
    Asanad K; Parameshwar PS; Houman J; Spiegel BM; Daskivich TJ; Anger JT
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(2):109-114. PubMed ID: 29474282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Quantitative Analysis of Online Plastic Surgeon Reviews for Abdominoplasty.
    Qiu CS; Hockney SM; Turin SY; Dorfman RG; Kim JYS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Mar; 143(3):734-742. PubMed ID: 30817644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient-Recorded Physician Ratings: What Can We Learn From 11,527 Online Reviews of Orthopedic Surgeons?
    Yu J; Samuel LT; Yalçin S; Sultan AA; Kamath AF
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 Jun; 35(6S):S364-S367. PubMed ID: 31818501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does experience matter? A meta-analysis of physician rating websites of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
    Jack RA; Burn MB; McCulloch PC; Liberman SR; Varner KE; Harris JD
    Musculoskelet Surg; 2018 Apr; 102(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 28853024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of Internet Review Site Comments for Spine Surgeons: How Office Staff, Physician Likeability, and Patient Outcome Are Associated With Online Evaluations.
    Donnally CJ; Roth ES; Li DJ; Maguire JA; McCormick JR; Barker GP; Rivera S; Lebwohl NH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Dec; 43(24):1725-1730. PubMed ID: 29975328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Ratings Game: Demographic and Practice Factors Affecting Yelp Ratings of Plastic Surgeons.
    Mark EJ; Driskill EK; Fisher CT; Swinehart SV; Bradford PS; Jones M; DeGeorge BR
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Aug; 152(2):463-471. PubMed ID: 36780357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of 4999 online physician ratings indicates that most patients give physicians a favorable rating.
    Kadry B; Chu LF; Kadry B; Gammas D; Macario A
    J Med Internet Res; 2011 Nov; 13(4):e95. PubMed ID: 22088924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Social media use by shoulder and elbow surgeons increases the number of ratings on physician review websites.
    McCormick JR; Patel MS; Hodakowski AJ; Rea PM; Naik KP; Cohn MR; Mehta N; Damodar D; Abboud JA; Garrigues GE
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Dec; 30(12):e713-e723. PubMed ID: 34343661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Online Ratings and Reviews of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Surgeons.
    Velasco BT; Chien B; Kwon JY; Miller CP
    Foot Ankle Spec; 2020 Feb; 13(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 30795702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.