BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31134780)

  • 1. Susceptibility of Dermacentor reticulatus tick to repellents containing different active ingrediens.
    Gliniewicz A; Borecka A; Przygodzka M; Mikulak E
    Przegl Epidemiol; 2019; 73(1):117-125. PubMed ID: 31134780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Formulations of deet, picaridin, and IR3535 applied to skin repel nymphs of the lone star tick (Acari: Ixodidae) for 12 hours.
    Carroll JF; Benante JP; Kramer M; Lohmeyer KH; Lawrence K
    J Med Entomol; 2010 Jul; 47(4):699-704. PubMed ID: 20695288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Insecticidal, acaricidal and repellent effects of DEET- and IR3535-impregnated bed nets using a novel long-lasting polymer-coating technique.
    Faulde MK; Albiez G; Nehring O
    Parasitol Res; 2010 Mar; 106(4):957-65. PubMed ID: 20162432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trends in insect repellent formulations: A review.
    Tavares M; da Silva MRM; de Oliveira de Siqueira LB; Rodrigues RAS; Bodjolle-d'Almeida L; Dos Santos EP; Ricci-Júnior E
    Int J Pharm; 2018 Mar; 539(1-2):190-209. PubMed ID: 29410208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lethal and behavioural effects of three synthetic repellents (DEET, IR3535 and KBR 3023) on Aedes aegypti mosquitoes in laboratory assays.
    Licciardi S; Herve JP; Darriet F; Hougard JM; Corbel V
    Med Vet Entomol; 2006 Sep; 20(3):288-93. PubMed ID: 17044879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Insecticidal and Behavioral Avoidance Responses of Anopheles minimus and Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) to Three Synthetic Repellents.
    Boonyuan W; Sathantriphop S; Tainchum K; Muenworn V; Prabaripai A; Bangs MJ; Chareonviriyaphap T
    J Med Entomol; 2017 Sep; 54(5):1312-1322. PubMed ID: 28419272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The efficacy of repellents against Aedes, Anopheles, Culex and Ixodes spp. - a literature review.
    Lupi E; Hatz C; Schlagenhauf P
    Travel Med Infect Dis; 2013; 11(6):374-411. PubMed ID: 24201040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Repellent efficacy of DEET, Icaridin, and EBAAP against Ixodes ricinus and Ixodes scapularis nymphs (Acari, Ixodidae).
    Büchel K; Bendin J; Gharbi A; Rahlenbeck S; Dautel H
    Ticks Tick Borne Dis; 2015 Jun; 6(4):494-8. PubMed ID: 25936273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Generic insect repellent detector from the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster.
    Syed Z; Pelletier J; Flounders E; Chitolina RF; Leal WS
    PLoS One; 2011 Mar; 6(3):e17705. PubMed ID: 21436880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neurophysiological and behavioral responses of gypsy moth larvae to insect repellents: DEET, IR3535, and picaridin.
    Sanford JL; Barski SA; Seen CM; Dickens JC; Shields VD
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99924. PubMed ID: 24955823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Novel arthropod repellent, BioUD, is an efficacious alternative to deet.
    Witting-Bissinger BE; Stumpf CF; Donohue KV; Apperson CS; Roe RM
    J Med Entomol; 2008 Sep; 45(5):891-8. PubMed ID: 18826032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do Commercial Insect Repellents Provide Protection against the Tick
    de Barcelos BR; Coelho NGSS; Santos MMB; Vale FL; Teixeira ALC; Pereira E Souza LM; Zeringóta V; de Oliveira Monteiro CM; Eugenio CUO; Obara MT
    Pathogens; 2023 Dec; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 38276155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative efficacy of insect repellents against mosquito bites.
    Fradin MS; Day JF
    N Engl J Med; 2002 Jul; 347(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 12097535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Molecular evidence for the inhibition of cytochrome p450s and cholinesterases in ticks by the repellent DEET.
    Koloski CW; LeMoine CMR; Klonowski AR; Smith CM; Cassone BJ
    Ticks Tick Borne Dis; 2019 Apr; 10(3):515-522. PubMed ID: 30612950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the tick repellent efficacy of chemical and biological products originating from Europe and the USA.
    Semmler M; Abdel-Ghaffar F; Al-Rasheid KA; Mehlhorn H
    Parasitol Res; 2011 Apr; 108(4):899-904. PubMed ID: 21085991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy of unregulated minimum risk tick repellent products evaluated with Ixodes scapularis nymphs in a human skin bioassay.
    Burtis JC; Ford SL; Parise CM; Eisen RJ; Eisen L
    Parasit Vectors; 2024 Feb; 17(1):50. PubMed ID: 38303091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative field evaluation of repellent formulations containing deet and IR3535 against mosquitoes in Queensland, Australia.
    Frances SP; MacKenzie DO; Rowcliffe KL; Corcoran SK
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2009 Dec; 25(4):511-3. PubMed ID: 20099600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Natural insensitivity and the effects of concentration on the repellency and survival of American dog ticks (Dermacentor variabilis) by DEET.
    Koloski CW; Duncan CAM; Rutherford PL; Cassone BJ
    Exp Appl Acarol; 2020 Nov; 82(3):379-395. PubMed ID: 33009647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative efficacy of IR3535 and deet as repellents against adult Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus.
    Cilek JE; Petersen JL; Hallmon CE
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2004 Sep; 20(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 15532931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Solvent, drying time, and substrate affect the responses of lone star ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) to the repellents deet and picaridin.
    Carroll JF; Carroll JF; Kramer M; Bedoukian RH
    J Med Entomol; 2014 May; 51(3):629-37. PubMed ID: 24897855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.