These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31135886)

  • 1. The functional false discovery rate with applications to genomics.
    Chen X; Robinson DG; Storey JD
    Biostatistics; 2021 Jan; 22(1):68-81. PubMed ID: 31135886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ConReg-R: Extrapolative recalibration of the empirical distribution of p-values to improve false discovery rate estimates.
    Li J; Paramita P; Choi KP; Karuturi RK
    Biol Direct; 2011 May; 6():27. PubMed ID: 21595983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Control of false discoveries in grouped hypothesis testing for eQTL data.
    Rudra P; Zhou YH; Nobel A; Wright FA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2024 Apr; 25(1):147. PubMed ID: 38605284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Re-sampling strategy to improve the estimation of number of null hypotheses in FDR control under strong correlation structures.
    Lu X; Perkins DL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 8():157. PubMed ID: 17509157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High-confidence discovery of genetic network regulators in expression quantitative trait loci data.
    Duarte CW; Zeng ZB
    Genetics; 2011 Mar; 187(3):955-64. PubMed ID: 21212238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determination of the differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments using local FDR.
    Aubert J; Bar-Hen A; Daudin JJ; Robin S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Sep; 5():125. PubMed ID: 15350197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Empirical Bayes estimation of posterior probabilities of enrichment: a comparative study of five estimators of the local false discovery rate.
    Yang Z; Li Z; Bickel DR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Mar; 14():87. PubMed ID: 23497228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiple testing in large-scale genetic studies.
    Bouaziz M; Jeanmougin M; Guedj M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 888():213-33. PubMed ID: 22665284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A practical guide to methods controlling false discoveries in computational biology.
    Korthauer K; Kimes PK; Duvallet C; Reyes A; Subramanian A; Teng M; Shukla C; Alm EJ; Hicks SC
    Genome Biol; 2019 Jun; 20(1):118. PubMed ID: 31164141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prog-Plot - a visual method to determine functional relationships for false discovery rate regression methods.
    Bello N; López-Kleine L
    J Cell Sci; 2023 Jan; 136(1):. PubMed ID: 36482762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving power of genome-wide association studies with weighted false discovery rate control and prioritized subset analysis.
    Lin WY; Lee WC
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e33716. PubMed ID: 22496761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
    Datta S; Datta S
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating the posterior probability that genome-wide association findings are true or false.
    Bukszár J; McClay JL; van den Oord EJ
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Jul; 25(14):1807-13. PubMed ID: 19420056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving false discovery rate estimation.
    Pounds S; Cheng C
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Jul; 20(11):1737-45. PubMed ID: 14988112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A direct approach to estimating false discovery rates conditional on covariates.
    Boca SM; Leek JT
    PeerJ; 2018; 6():e6035. PubMed ID: 30581661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Local false discovery rate estimation with competition-based procedures for variable selection.
    Sun X; Fu Y
    Stat Med; 2024 Jan; 43(1):61-88. PubMed ID: 37927105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptive local false discovery rate procedures for highly spiky data and their application RNA sequencing data of yeast SET4 deletion mutants.
    Ramos ML; Park D; Lim J; Park J; Tran K; Garcia EJ; Green E
    Biom J; 2021 Dec; 63(8):1729-1744. PubMed ID: 34320248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A mixture model for estimating the local false discovery rate in DNA microarray analysis.
    Liao JG; Lin Y; Selvanayagam ZE; Shih WJ
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Nov; 20(16):2694-701. PubMed ID: 15145810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Controlling the proportion of false positives in multiple dependent tests.
    Fernando RL; Nettleton D; Southey BR; Dekkers JC; Rothschild MF; Soller M
    Genetics; 2004 Jan; 166(1):611-9. PubMed ID: 15020448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Considering dependence among genes and markers for false discovery control in eQTL mapping.
    Chen L; Tong T; Zhao H
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Sep; 24(18):2015-22. PubMed ID: 18635565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.