BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31135929)

  • 1. IMPACT OF PELVIC AND RAD-BOARD LEAD SHIELDS ON OPERATOR AND PATIENT RADIATION DOSE IN TRANS-RADIAL CORONARY PROCEDURES.
    Khaleghi Fard A; Alian AHM; Pourafkari L; Ghojazadeh M; Tarighatnia A; Farajollahi A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 187(1):108-114. PubMed ID: 31135929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized study comparing the use of a pelvic lead shield during trans-radial interventions: Threefold decrease in radiation to the operator but double exposure to the patient.
    Musallam A; Volis I; Dadaev S; Abergel E; Soni A; Yalonetsky S; Kerner A; Roguin A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jun; 85(7):1164-70. PubMed ID: 25510441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomized controlled trial to assess operator radiation exposure from cardiac catheterization procedures using RAD BOARD® with standard pelvic shielding versus standard pelvic shielding alone.
    Suryadevara R; Brown ED; Green SM; Scott TD; Nordberg CM; Blankenship JC
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jan; 95(1):83-88. PubMed ID: 30866175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reduction of operator radiation dose by a pelvic lead shield during cardiac catheterization by radial access: comparison with femoral access.
    Lange HW; von Boetticher H
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Apr; 5(4):445-9. PubMed ID: 22516403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extended Protective Shield Under Table to Reduce Operator Radiation Dose in Percutaneous Coronary Procedures.
    Sciahbasi A; Sarandrea A; Rigattieri S; Patrizi R; Cera M; Di Russo C; Zezza L; Fedele S; Ferraiuolo G
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Feb; 12(2):e007586. PubMed ID: 30732471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effectiveness of low rate fluoroscopy at reducing operator and patient radiation dose during transradial coronary angiography and interventions.
    Abdelaal E; Plourde G; MacHaalany J; Arsenault J; Rimac G; Déry JP; Barbeau G; Larose E; De Larochellière R; Nguyen CM; Allende R; Ribeiro H; Costerousse O; Mongrain R; Bertrand OF;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 7(5):567-74. PubMed ID: 24746649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comments on "A randomized study comparing the use of a pelvic lead shield during trans-radial interventions: Threefold decrease in radiation to the operator but double exposure to the patient".
    Jones AK
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 86(5):958-9. PubMed ID: 25914315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response to comment on "a randomized study comparing the use of a pelvic lead shield during trans-radial interventions: Threefold decrease in radiation to the operator but double exposure to the patient".
    Roguin A; Musallam A; Rappaport B
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 86(5):960. PubMed ID: 25914301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient radiation exposure in right versus left trans-radial approach for coronary procedures.
    Rigattieri S; Di Russo C; Cera M; Fedele S; Sciahbasi A; Pugliese FR
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2015; 16(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 25576274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiation Exposure and Vascular Access in Acute Coronary Syndromes: The RAD-Matrix Trial.
    Sciahbasi A; Frigoli E; Sarandrea A; Rothenbühler M; Calabrò P; Lupi A; Tomassini F; Cortese B; Rigattieri S; Cerrato E; Zavalloni D; Zingarelli A; Calabria P; Rubartelli P; Sardella G; Tebaldi M; Windecker S; Jüni P; Heg D; Valgimigli M
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 May; 69(20):2530-2537. PubMed ID: 28330794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Staff radiation dose during percutaneous coronary procedures: Role of adjunctive protective drapes.
    Sciahbasi A; Sarandrea A; Rigattieri S; Patrizi R; Cera M; Di Russo C; Perone F; Porretta V; Fedele S; Romano S; Penco M; Ferraiuolo G
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Oct; 19(7 Pt A):755-758. PubMed ID: 29691182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of an extension tube on operator radiation exposure during coronary procedures performed through the radial approach.
    Marque N; Jégou A; Varenne O; Salengro E; Allouch P; Margot O; Spaulding C
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2009 Nov; 102(11):749-54. PubMed ID: 19944390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy of the RADPAD Protection Drape in Reducing Operators' Radiation Exposure in the Catheterization Laboratory: A Sham-Controlled Randomized Trial.
    Vlastra W; Delewi R; Sjauw KD; Beijk MA; Claessen BE; Streekstra GJ; Bekker RJ; van Hattum JC; Wykrzykowska JJ; Vis MM; Koch KT; de Winter RJ; Piek JJ; Henriques JPS
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 29089313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiation safety: Patients First "Where Is the Radiation Needle on the Ethical Compass?".
    Chambers CE; Miller DL
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jun; 85(7):1171-2. PubMed ID: 25999276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention is associated with lower patient radiation exposure in high-radial-volume centres: Insights from the RAY'ACT-1 study.
    Georges JL; Belle L; Meunier L; Dechery T; Khalifé K; Pecheux M; Elhaddad S; Amabile N; Pansieri M; Ballout J; Marchand X; Rouault G; Leddet P; Nugue O; Lucke N; Cattan S;
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2017 Mar; 110(3):179-187. PubMed ID: 28117244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy of MAVIG X-Ray Protective Drapes in Reducing Operator Radiation Dose in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    McCutcheon K; Vanhaverbeke M; Pauwels R; Dabin J; Schoonjans W; Bennett J; Adriaenssens T; Dubois C; Sinnaeve P; Desmet W
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Nov; 13(11):e009627. PubMed ID: 33092401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reduction of scatter radiation during transradial percutaneous coronary angiography: a randomized trial using a lead-free radiation shield.
    Politi L; Biondi-Zoccai G; Nocetti L; Costi T; Monopoli D; Rossi R; Sgura F; Modena MG; Sangiorgi GM
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Jan; 79(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 21520391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of clinical occupational dose reduction effect of a new interventional cardiology shield for radial access combined with a scatter reducing drape.
    Gilligan P; Lynch J; Eder H; Maguire S; Fox E; Doyle B; Casserly I; McCann H; Foley D
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 86(5):935-40. PubMed ID: 26154301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiation Exposure of Patients and Interventional Radiologists during Prostatic Artery Embolization: A Prospective Single-Operator Study.
    Andrade G; Khoury HJ; Garzón WJ; Dubourcq F; Bredow MF; Monsignore LM; Abud DG
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2017 Apr; 28(4):517-521. PubMed ID: 28259503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determinants of operator and patient radiation exposure during cardiac catheterization: Insights from the RadiCure (RADIation reduction during cardiac catheterization using real-timE monitoring) trial.
    Christopoulos G; Papayannis AC; Alomar M; Christakopoulos GE; Kotsia A; Michael TT; Rangan BV; Roesle M; Shorrock D; Makke L; Maragkoudakis S; Mohammad A; Sarode K; Chambers CE; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Dec; 88(7):1046-1055. PubMed ID: 26707858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.