These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31136232)

  • 1. Auditory-Perceptual Rating of Connected Speech in Aphasia.
    Casilio M; Rising K; Beeson PM; Bunton K; Wilson SM
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2019 May; 28(2):550-568. PubMed ID: 31136232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An Integrative Analysis of Spontaneous Storytelling Discourse in Aphasia: Relationship With Listeners' Rating and Prediction of Severity and Fluency Status of Aphasia.
    Kong AP; Wong CW
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2018 Nov; 27(4):1491-1505. PubMed ID: 30458505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of visual feedback and training in auditory-perceptual judgment of voice quality.
    Barsties B; Beers M; Ten Cate L; Van Ballegooijen K; Braam L; De Groot M; Van Der Kant M; Kruitwagen C; Maryn Y
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2017 Apr; 42(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 26525078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual Assessment of Tracheoesophageal Voice Quality With the SToPS: The Development of a Reliable and Valid Tool.
    Hurren A; Miller N; Carding P
    J Voice; 2019 Jul; 33(4):465-472. PubMed ID: 30072205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Teachers' Perception of Vocal Quality Compared With Professional Perception.
    Selevan E; Schorr E; Pekarsky R; Mitta S; Diamont S; Stept E; Oliveira G
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):763.e17-763.e21. PubMed ID: 26739856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice Quality of Cochlear-implanted and Normal-hearing Individuals: A Reliability Study.
    Coelho AC; Brasolotto AG; Fernandes ACN; de Souza Medved DM; da Silva EM; Júnior FB
    J Voice; 2017 Nov; 31(6):774.e1-774.e8. PubMed ID: 28318969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech tasks and interrater reliability in perceptual voice evaluation.
    Lu FL; Matteson S
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):725-32. PubMed ID: 24841668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Japanese Language.
    Hosokawa K; Barsties B; Iwahashi T; Iwahashi M; Kato C; Iwaki S; Sasai H; Miyauchi A; Matsushiro N; Inohara H; Ogawa M; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):260.e1-260.e9. PubMed ID: 27287930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
    Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) Psychometric Characteristics: II European Portuguese Version (II EP CAPE-V).
    de Almeida SC; Mendes AP; Kempster GB
    J Voice; 2019 Jul; 33(4):582.e5-582.e13. PubMed ID: 29936062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Influence of Native Language on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Samples Completed by Brazilian and Canadian SLPs.
    Chaves CR; Campbell M; Côrtes Gama AC
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):258.e1-258.e5. PubMed ID: 27427162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V).
    Özcebe E; Aydinli FE; Tiğrak TK; İncebay Ö; Yilmaz T
    J Voice; 2019 May; 33(3):382.e1-382.e10. PubMed ID: 29331405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concatenation of the Moving Window Technique for Auditory-Perceptual Analysis of Voice Quality.
    Ehrlich B; Lin L; Jiang J
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2018 Nov; 27(4):1426-1433. PubMed ID: 30304342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How Do Voice Perceptual Changes Predict Acoustic Parameters in Persian Voice Patients?
    Hosseinifar S; Torabinezhad F; Ghelichi L; Roudbari M; Silverman EP; Faham M
    J Voice; 2018 Nov; 32(6):705-709. PubMed ID: 29033255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The cut-off analysis using visual analogue scale and cepstral assessments on severity of voice disorder.
    Lee YW; Kim GH; Bae IH; Park HJ; Wang SG; Kwon SB
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2018 Dec; 43(4):175-180. PubMed ID: 29671679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discourse Characteristics in Aphasia Beyond the Western Aphasia Battery Cutoff.
    Fromm D; Forbes M; Holland A; Dalton SG; Richardson J; MacWhinney B
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2017 Aug; 26(3):762-768. PubMed ID: 28505222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the Believability of Standardized Patients Trained to Portray Communication Disorders.
    Baylor C; Burns MI; Struijk J; Herron L; Mach H; Yorkston K
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2017 Aug; 26(3):791-805. PubMed ID: 28595263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of Training With Anchors on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Dysphonia in Speech-Language Pathology Students.
    Wong DW; Chan RW; Wu CH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Apr; 64(4):1136-1156. PubMed ID: 33769849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Influence of Voice Sample Length in the Auditory-Perceptual Judgment of Overall Voice Quality.
    Barsties B; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):202-210. PubMed ID: 27539001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effect of Telephone Transmission on Voice Quality Perception.
    Passetti RR; Constantini AC
    J Voice; 2019 Sep; 33(5):649-658. PubMed ID: 30146232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.