These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31136684)

  • 1. Information presentation and consumer choice: Evidence from Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Success Rate Reports.
    Wu B
    Health Econ; 2019 Jul; 28(7):868-883. PubMed ID: 31136684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The status of public reporting of clinical outcomes in assisted reproductive technology.
    Kushnir VA; Vidali A; Barad DH; Gleicher N
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Sep; 100(3):736-41. PubMed ID: 23755956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - 
United States, 2013.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Dec; 64(11):1-25. PubMed ID: 26633040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Aug; 64(6):1-29. PubMed ID: 26270152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2014 Nov; 63(10):1-28. PubMed ID: 25412164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford S; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2013 Dec; 62(9):1-24. PubMed ID: 24304902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2000.
    Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2003 Aug; 52(9):1-16. PubMed ID: 14532867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2001.
    Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G; Kissin D
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2004 Apr; 53(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 15123982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2009.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Flowers L; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2012 Nov; 61(7):1-23. PubMed ID: 23114281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Geographic access to assisted reproductive technology health care in the United States: a population-based cross-sectional study.
    Harris JA; Menke MN; Haefner JK; Moniz MH; Perumalswami CR
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Apr; 107(4):1023-1027. PubMed ID: 28314508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2003.
    Wright VC; Chang J; Jeng G; Macaluso M
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2006 May; 55(4):1-22. PubMed ID: 16723970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: Assisted Reproductive Technology 2008, 2009 and 2010.
    Dyer S; Chambers GM; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG; Zegers-Hochschild F; Mansour R; Ishihara O; Banker M; Adamson GD
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Jul; 31(7):1588-609. PubMed ID: 27207175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2002.
    Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2005 Jun; 54(2):1-24. PubMed ID: 15931153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The association between fertility clinic performance and cycle volume: implications for public reporting of provider performance data.
    Gong D; Seli E
    Fertil Steril; 2012 Jul; 98(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 22521157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Public reporting of assisted reproductive technology outcomes: past, present, and future.
    Williams RS; Doody KJ; Schattman GL; Adashi EY
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 24813599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2006.
    Sunderam S; Chang J; Flowers L; Kulkarni A; Sentelle G; Jeng G; Macaluso M;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2009 Jun; 58(5):1-25. PubMed ID: 19521336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assisted reproductive technology use and outcomes among women with a history of cancer.
    Luke B; Brown MB; Missmer SA; Spector LG; Leach RE; Williams M; Koch L; Smith YR; Stern JE; Ball GD; Schymura MJ
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Jan; 31(1):183-9. PubMed ID: 26577302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2005.
    Wright VC; Chang J; Jeng G; Macaluso M;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2008 Jun; 57(5):1-23. PubMed ID: 18566567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance - United States, 2004.
    Wright VC; Chang J; Jeng G; Chen M; Macaluso M;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2007 Jun; 56(6):1-22. PubMed ID: 17557073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CDC-reported assisted reproductive technology live-birth rates may mislead the public.
    Kushnir VA; Choi J; Darmon SK; Albertini DF; Barad DH; Gleicher N
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2017 Aug; 35(2):161-164. PubMed ID: 28578895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.