These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31138235)

  • 1. Imaging modalities to diagnose carotid artery stenosis: progress and prospect.
    Saxena A; Ng EYK; Lim ST
    Biomed Eng Online; 2019 May; 18(1):66. PubMed ID: 31138235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Duplex ultrasound velocity criteria for the stented carotid artery.
    Lal BK; Hobson RW; Tofighi B; Kapadia I; Cuadra S; Jamil Z
    J Vasc Surg; 2008 Jan; 47(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 18178455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of carotid artery stenosis using histological specimens: a comparison of CT angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and Doppler ultrasonography.
    Netuka D; Belšán T; Broulíková K; Mandys V; Charvát F; Malík J; Coufalová L; Bradáč O; Ostrý S; Beneš V
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2016 Aug; 158(8):1505-14. PubMed ID: 27255656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical usefulness of and problems with three-dimensional CT angiography for the evaluation of arteriosclerotic stenosis of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional angiography, MRA, and ultrasound sonography.
    Sameshima T; Futami S; Morita Y; Yokogami K; Miyahara S; Sameshima Y; Goya T; Wakisaka S
    Surg Neurol; 1999 Mar; 51(3):301-8; discussion 308-9. PubMed ID: 10086495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy and utility of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in planning carotid stenting.
    Timaran CH; Rosero EB; Valentine RJ; Modrall JG; Smith S; Clagett GP
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 46(2):257-63; discussion 263-4. PubMed ID: 17600659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review.
    Nederkoorn PJ; van der Graaf Y; Hunink MG
    Stroke; 2003 May; 34(5):1324-32. PubMed ID: 12690221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multimodality Imaging of Carotid Stenosis.
    Adla T; Adlova R
    Int J Angiol; 2015 Sep; 24(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 26417185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modalities of preoperative imaging of the internal carotid artery used in France.
    Long A; Lepoutre A; Corbillon E; Branchereau A; Kretz JG
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2002 May; 16(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 12016537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Diagnostic imaging of carotid stenosis: ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography angiography].
    Nemoto S
    Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 2011 Nov; 112(6):371-6. PubMed ID: 22165710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Carotid Doppler Ultrasound to Other Angiographic Modalities in the Measurement of Carotid Artery Stenosis.
    Boyko M; Kalashyan H; Becher H; Romanchuk H; Saqqur M; Rempel JL; Derksen C; Shuaib A; Khan K
    J Neuroimaging; 2018 Nov; 28(6):683-687. PubMed ID: 29917285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acoustic shadowing impairs accurate characterization of stenosis in carotid ultrasound examinations.
    Mohebali J; Patel VI; Romero JM; Hannon KM; Jaff MR; Cambria RP; LaMuraglia GM
    J Vasc Surg; 2015 Nov; 62(5):1236-44. PubMed ID: 26506272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Complete MR angiography and Doppler ultrasound as the sole imaging modalities prior to carotid endarterectomy.
    Saouaf R; Grassi CJ; Hartnell GG; Wheeler H; Suojanen JN
    Clin Radiol; 1998 Aug; 53(8):579-86. PubMed ID: 9744583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy.
    Patel SG; Collie DA; Wardlaw JM; Lewis SC; Wright AR; Gibson RJ; Sellar RJ
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2002 Jul; 73(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 12082040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contemporary carotid imaging: from degree of stenosis to plaque vulnerability.
    Brinjikji W; Huston J; Rabinstein AA; Kim GM; Lerman A; Lanzino G
    J Neurosurg; 2016 Jan; 124(1):27-42. PubMed ID: 26230478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating non-invasive medical imaging for diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis with ischemic cerebrovascular disease.
    Lu X; Zhang W; Gui Q; Yu M; Guo Y
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2003 Jan; 116(1):112-5. PubMed ID: 12667401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computed tomography angiography validates duplex sonographic evaluation of carotid artery stenosis.
    Cinat ME; Casalme C; Wilson SE; Pham H; Anderson P
    Am Surg; 2003 Oct; 69(10):842-7. PubMed ID: 14570360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combined use of duplex imaging and magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of patients with symptomatic ipsilateral high-grade carotid stenosis.
    Turnipseed WD; Kennell TW; Turski PA; Acher CW; Hoch JR
    J Vasc Surg; 1993 May; 17(5):832-9; discussion 839-40. PubMed ID: 8487351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Measurement and Grading of Carotid Stenosis with Computed Tomography Angiography and Doppler Ultrasound.
    Birmpili P; Porter L; Shaikh U; Torella F
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2018 Aug; 51():217-224. PubMed ID: 29522870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Current diagnostic modalities for vulnerable plaque detection.
    Schaar JA; Mastik F; Regar E; den Uil CA; Gijsen FJ; Wentzel JJ; Serruys PW; van der Stehen AF
    Curr Pharm Des; 2007; 13(10):995-1001. PubMed ID: 17430163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CT angiography for the detection and characterization of carotid artery bifurcation disease.
    Anderson GB; Ashforth R; Steinke DE; Ferdinandy R; Findlay JM
    Stroke; 2000 Sep; 31(9):2168-74. PubMed ID: 10978047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.