These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31138854)

  • 1. Permutation Statistics for Connectivity Analysis between Regions of Interest in EEG and MEG Data.
    Mamashli F; Hämäläinen M; Ahveninen J; Kenet T; Khan S
    Sci Rep; 2019 May; 9(1):7942. PubMed ID: 31138854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring the cortical correlation structure of spontaneous oscillatory activity with EEG and MEG.
    Siems M; Pape AA; Hipp JF; Siegel M
    Neuroimage; 2016 Apr; 129():345-355. PubMed ID: 26827813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Beamformer source analysis and connectivity on concurrent EEG and MEG data during voluntary movements.
    Muthuraman M; Hellriegel H; Hoogenboom N; Anwar AR; Mideksa KG; Krause H; Schnitzler A; Deuschl G; Raethjen J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e91441. PubMed ID: 24618596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hyperedge bundling: A practical solution to spurious interactions in MEG/EEG source connectivity analyses.
    Wang SH; Lobier M; Siebenhühner F; Puoliväli T; Palva S; Palva JM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jun; 173():610-622. PubMed ID: 29378318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Imaging of neural oscillations with embedded inferential and group prevalence statistics.
    Donhauser PW; Florin E; Baillet S
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Feb; 14(2):e1005990. PubMed ID: 29408902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. EEG-MEG Integration Enhances the Characterization of Functional and Effective Connectivity in the Resting State Network.
    Muthuraman M; Moliadze V; Mideksa KG; Anwar AR; Stephani U; Deuschl G; Freitag CM; Siniatchkin M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140832. PubMed ID: 26509448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High-dimensional brain-wide functional connectivity mapping in magnetoencephalography.
    Sanchez-Bornot JM; Lopez ME; Bruña R; Maestu F; Youssofzadeh V; Yang S; Finn DP; Todd S; McLean PL; Prasad G; Wong-Lin K
    J Neurosci Methods; 2021 Jan; 348():108991. PubMed ID: 33181166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of Magnetoencephalography and High-Density Electroencephalography Resting-State Functional Connectivity Metrics.
    Marquetand J; Vannoni S; Carboni M; Li Hegner Y; Stier C; Braun C; Focke NK
    Brain Connect; 2019 Sep; 9(7):539-553. PubMed ID: 31115272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multimodal integration of EEG and MEG data: a simulation study with variable signal-to-noise ratio and number of sensors.
    Babiloni F; Babiloni C; Carducci F; Romani GL; Rossini PM; Angelone LM; Cincotti F
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2004 May; 22(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 15083526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of epileptiform activity by human interpreters: blinded comparison between electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography.
    Iwasaki M; Pestana E; Burgess RC; Lüders HO; Shamoto H; Nakasato N
    Epilepsia; 2005 Jan; 46(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 15660769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in MEG and EEG power-law scaling explained by a coupling between spatial coherence and frequency: a simulation study.
    Bénar CG; Grova C; Jirsa VK; Lina JM
    J Comput Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 47(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 31292816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
    Engemann DA; Gramfort A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
    Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accounting for linear transformations of EEG and MEG data in source analysis.
    Hipp JF; Siegel M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0121048. PubMed ID: 25836951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
    Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial neuronal synchronization and the waveform of oscillations: Implications for EEG and MEG.
    Schaworonkow N; Nikulin VV
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 May; 15(5):e1007055. PubMed ID: 31086368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multimodal description of whole brain connectivity: A comparison of resting state MEG, fMRI, and DWI.
    Garcés P; Pereda E; Hernández-Tamames JA; Del-Pozo F; Maestú F; Pineda-Pardo JÁ
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Jan; 37(1):20-34. PubMed ID: 26503502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of the head model on EEG and MEG source connectivity analyses.
    Cho JH; Vorwerk J; Wolters CH; Knösche TR
    Neuroimage; 2015 Apr; 110():60-77. PubMed ID: 25638756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving the interpretability of all-to-all pairwise source connectivity analysis in MEG with nonhomogeneous smoothing.
    Schoffelen JM; Gross J
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2011 Mar; 32(3):426-37. PubMed ID: 21319268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.