591 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31139912)
1. Complications Following Subpectoral Versus Prepectoral Breast Augmentation: A Meta-analysis.
Li S; Mu D; Liu C; Xin M; Fu S; Xu B; Li Z; Qi J; Luan J
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2019 Aug; 43(4):890-898. PubMed ID: 31139912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Postoperative Complications Following Prepectoral Versus Partial Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using ADM: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Zhu L; Liu C
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Aug; 47(4):1260-1273. PubMed ID: 36947180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment of Breast Animation Deformity in Implant-Based Reconstruction with Selective Nerve Ablation.
Eck DL; Nguyen DC; Barnes LL; Jansen DA
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2018 Dec; 42(6):1472-1475. PubMed ID: 29959495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Capsular Contracture Rate After Breast Augmentation with Periareolar Versus Other Two (Inframammary and Transaxillary) Incisions: A Meta-Analysis.
Li S; Chen L; Liu W; Mu D; Luan J
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2018 Feb; 42(1):32-37. PubMed ID: 28916908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Botulinum Toxin A Plays an Important Role in the Placement of Implants Deep Within the Pectoralis Major Muscle for Mammaplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Li T; Liu Y; Zhang W
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2018 Dec; 42(6):1519-1530. PubMed ID: 30083802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Use of "Precapsular Space" in Secondary Breast Reconstruction.
Zingaretti N; De Lorenzi F; Dell'Antonia F; De Biasio F; Riccio M; Parodi PC
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Oct; 40(5):716-23. PubMed ID: 27443324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prepectoral Revision Breast Reconstruction for Treatment of Implant-Associated Animation Deformity: A Review of 102 Reconstructions.
Gabriel A; Sigalove S; Sigalove NM; Storm-Dickerson TL; Rice J; Pope N; Maxwell GP
Aesthet Surg J; 2018 Apr; 38(5):519-526. PubMed ID: 29365064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes Utilizing Inspira Implants in Revisionary Reconstructive Surgery.
Sigalove S; Maxwell GP; Gabriel A
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jul; 144(1S Utilizing a Spectrum of Cohesive Implants in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery):66S-72S. PubMed ID: 31246763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast Auto-augmentation (Mastopexy and Lipofilling): An Option for Quitting Breast Implants.
Graf RM; Closs Ono MC; Pace D; Balbinot P; Pazio ALB; de Paula DR
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2019 Oct; 43(5):1133-1141. PubMed ID: 31065751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Examination of Outcome Disparities in Reports of Prepectoral and Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Montorfano L; Hung YC; Chaker S; Saad M; Kalmar CL; Ferri F; Higdon KK; Perdikis G
Ann Plast Surg; 2023 May; 90(5):506-515. PubMed ID: 36975095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Critical Appraisal of Late Complications of Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
King CA; Bartholomew AJ; Sosin M; Avila A; Famiglietti AL; Dekker PK; Perez-Alvarez IM; Song DH; Fan KL; Tousimis EA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Dec; 28(13):9150-9158. PubMed ID: 34386913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis.
Li Y; Xu G; Yu N; Huang J; Long X
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Oct; 85(4):437-447. PubMed ID: 31913902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality of life, pain of prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with a discussion on cost: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ching AH; Lim K; Sze PW; Ooi A
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Aug; 75(8):2550-2560. PubMed ID: 35393263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Safety Outcome Endpoints and Delineation of Risk Factors.
Nealon KP; Weitzman RE; Sobti N; Gadd M; Specht M; Jimenez RB; Ehrlichman R; Faulkner HR; Austen WG; Liao EC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 May; 145(5):898e-908e. PubMed ID: 32332523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgeons' Dilemma: Treatment of Implant-Associated Infection in the Cosmetic Breast Augmentation Patient.
Vasilakis V; Yamin F; Reish RG
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2019 Aug; 43(4):905-909. PubMed ID: 30944965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Evaluation of Patient's Quality of Life and Satisfaction with BREAST-Q.
Cogliandro A; Salzillo R; De Bernardis R; Loria FS; Petrucci V; Barone M; Tenna S; Cagli B; Persichetti P
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Aug; 47(4):1291-1299. PubMed ID: 36944866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reoperative Augmentation Mammoplasty: An Algorithm to Optimize Soft-Tissue Support, Pocket Control, and Smooth Implant Stability with Composite Reverse Inferior Muscle Sling (CRIMS) and its Technical Variations.
Munhoz AM; de Azevedo Marques Neto A; Maximiliano J
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2022 Jun; 46(3):1116-1132. PubMed ID: 35075504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Staying Out of Double-Bubble and Bottoming-Out Deformities in Dual-Plane Breast Augmentation: Anatomical and Clinical Study.
Salgarello M; Visconti G
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2017 Oct; 41(5):999-1006. PubMed ID: 28656352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgical Correction of Breast Animation Deformity with Implant Pocket Conversion to a Prepectoral Plane.
Holland MC; Lentz R; Sbitany H
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Mar; 145(3):632-642. PubMed ID: 32097297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Maximizing the use of precapsular space and the choice of implant type in breast augmentation mammaplasty revisions: review of 49 consecutive procedures and patient satisfaction assessment.
Castello MF; Lazzeri D; Silvestri A; Agostini T; Pascone C; Marcelli C; Gigliotti D; D'Aniello C; Gasparotti M
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Oct; 35(5):828-38. PubMed ID: 21455821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
