197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31140585)
21. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A comparison of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for ripening of unfavorable cervix and labor induction.
Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Pokpirom J
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1997 Aug; 23(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9311179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Labor induction for premature rupture of membranes using vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert.
Abraham C; Meirowitz N; Kohn N
Am J Perinatol; 2014 Mar; 31(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 23592314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparison of misoprostol, controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert and oxytocin for cervical ripening.
Silfeler DB; Tandogan B; Ayvaci H; Silfeler I; Yenidede I; Dayicioglu V
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Dec; 284(6):1331-7. PubMed ID: 21290140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Misoprostol 50 microg sublingually versus vaginally for labor induction at term: a randomized study.
Caliskan E; Bodur H; Ozeren S; Corakci A; Ozkan S; Yucesoy I
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2005; 59(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 15640607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
Nunes F; Rodrigues R; Meirinho M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 181(3):626-9. PubMed ID: 10486474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A prospective randomized trial of labor induction with vaginal controlled-release dinoprostone inserts with or without oxytocin and misoprostol+oxytocin.
Tanir HM; Sener T; Yildiz C; Kaya M; Kurt I
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2008; 35(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 18390085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.
Paungmora N; Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Punyavachira P
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cardiotocographic abnormalities associated with misoprostol and dinoprostone cervical ripening and labor induction.
Pevzner L; Alfirevic Z; Powers BL; Wing DA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Jun; 156(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 21353372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparative efficacy and cost of the prostaglandin analogs dinoprostone and misoprostol as labor preinduction agents.
Ramsey PS; Harris DY; Ogburn PL; Heise RH; Magtibay PM; Ramin KD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Feb; 188(2):560-5. PubMed ID: 12592272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
Meyer M; Pflum J; Howard D
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: a randomized controlled trial.
Wing DA;
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 112(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 18827122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Randomized trial between two active labor management protocols in the presence of an unfavorable cervix.
Bolnick JM; Velazquez MD; Gonzalez JL; Rappaport VJ; McIlwain-Dunivan G; Rayburn WF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 190(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 14749647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.
Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM; Alfirevic Z
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):798-803. PubMed ID: 10453829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Dinoprostone versus misoprostol: a randomized study of nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor.
Lokugamage AU; Forsyth SF; Sullivan KR; El Refaey H; Rodeck CH
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2003 Feb; 82(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 12648174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Oral misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction in nulliparous women at term.
Faucett AM; Daniels K; Lee HC; El-Sayed YY; Blumenfeld YJ
J Perinatol; 2014 Feb; 34(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 24157494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Controlled-release misoprostol vaginal insert in parous women for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Ewert K; Powers B; Robertson S; Alfirevic Z
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 108(5):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17077234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Intracervical misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 for labor induction.
Chang YK; Chen WH; Yu MH; Liu HS
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Jan; 80(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 12527456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Randomized trial of two doses of the prostaglandin E1 analog misoprostol for labor induction.
Farah LA; Sanchez-Ramos L; Rosa C; Del Valle GO; Gaudier FL; Delke I; Kaunitz AM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 177(2):364-9; discussion 369-71. PubMed ID: 9290452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labor: a systematic review.
Kundodyiwa TW; Alfirevic Z; Weeks AD
Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 113(2 Pt 1):374-83. PubMed ID: 19155909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
