These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31141075)
1. IS THE PHYSICIAN EXPERTISE IN DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION OF VALUE IN DETECTING ANAL TONE IN COMPARISON TO ANORECTAL MANOMETRY? Pinto RA; CorrĂȘa Neto IJF; Nahas SC; Froehner Junior I; Soares DFM; Cecconello I Arq Gastroenterol; 2019; 56(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 31141075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. To what extent are anorectal function tests comparable? A study comparing digital rectal examination, anal electromyography, 3-dimensional high-resolution anal manometry, and transperineal ultrasound. Dekker L; van Reijn-Baggen DA; Han-Geurts IJM; Felt-Bersma RJF Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Jan; 38(1):12. PubMed ID: 36645523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The diagnostic value of a digital rectal examination compared with high-resolution anorectal manometry in patients with chronic constipation and fecal incontinence. Soh JS; Lee HJ; Jung KW; Yoon IJ; Koo HS; Seo SY; Lee S; Bae JH; Lee HS; Park SH; Yang DH; Kim KJ; Ye BD; Byeon JS; Yang SK; Kim JH; Myung SJ Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Aug; 110(8):1197-204. PubMed ID: 26032152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of anorectal function measured using wearable digital manometry and a high resolution manometry system. Attari A; Chey WD; Baker JR; Ashton-Miller JA PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0228761. PubMed ID: 32991595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 3D High-definition anorectal manometry: Values obtained in asymptomatic volunteers, fecal incontinence and chronic constipation. Results of a prospective multicenter study (NOMAD). Mion F; Garros A; Brochard C; Vitton V; Ropert A; Bouvier M; Damon H; Siproudhis L; Roman S Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2017 Aug; 29(8):. PubMed ID: 28251732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A novel technique for bedside anorectal manometry in humans. Bharucha AE; Stroetz R; Feuerhak K; Szarka LA; Zinsmeister AR Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2015 Oct; 27(10):1504-8. PubMed ID: 26227262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of longitudinal and radial characteristics of intra-anal pressures using 3D high-definition anorectal manometry between children with anoretal malformations and functional constipation. Ambartsumyan L; Shaffer M; Carlin K; Nurko S Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2021 Feb; 33(2):e13971. PubMed ID: 32902923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproducibility of high-definition (3D) manometry and its agreement with high-resolution (2D) manometry in women with fecal incontinence. Chakraborty S; Feuerhak KJ; Zinsmeister AR; Bharucha AE Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2017 Mar; 29(3):. PubMed ID: 27696628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anal inspection and digital rectal examination compared to anorectal physiology tests and endoanal ultrasonography in evaluating fecal incontinence. Dobben AC; Terra MP; Deutekom M; Gerhards MF; Bijnen AB; Felt-Bersma RJ; Janssen LW; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J Int J Colorectal Dis; 2007 Jul; 22(7):783-90. PubMed ID: 17096089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Evaluation of Digital Rectal Examination for Assessment of Anal Tone in Suspected Cauda Equina Syndrome. Sherlock KE; Turner W; Elsayed S; Bagouri M; Baha L; Boszczyk BM; McNally D Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Aug; 40(15):1213-8. PubMed ID: 25811266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Longitudinal and radial characteristics of intra-anal pressures in children using 3D high-definition anorectal manometry: new observations. Ambartsumyan L; Rodriguez L; Morera C; Nurko S Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Dec; 108(12):1918-28. PubMed ID: 24169274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How reliable is digital examination for the evaluation of anal sphincter tone? Eckardt VF; Kanzler G Int J Colorectal Dis; 1993 Jul; 8(2):95-7. PubMed ID: 8409694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Digital Rectal Examination: Appropriate Techniques for the Evaluation of Constipation and Fecal Incontinence. Sayuk GS Gastroenterol Clin North Am; 2022 Mar; 51(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 35135663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anal sphincter function as assessed by 3D high definition anorectal manometry. Mion F; Garros A; Subtil F; Damon H; Roman S Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol; 2018 Sep; 42(4):378-381. PubMed ID: 29551608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of the digital anal examination in women with fecal incontinence. Jeppson PC; Paraiso MF; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Jun; 23(6):765-8. PubMed ID: 22057427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anal resting pressures at manometry correlate with the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index and with presence of sphincter defects on ultrasound. Bordeianou L; Lee KY; Rockwood T; Baxter NN; Lowry A; Mellgren A; Parker S Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Jul; 51(7):1010-4. PubMed ID: 18437494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnosing anal sphincter injury with transanal ultrasound and manometry. Sentovich SM; Blatchford GJ; Rivela LJ; Lin K; Thorson AG; Christensen MA Dis Colon Rectum; 1997 Dec; 40(12):1430-4. PubMed ID: 9407980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The digital rectal examination scoring system (DRESS). Orkin BA; Sinykin SB; Lloyd PC Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Dec; 53(12):1656-60. PubMed ID: 21178861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High-resolution Anorectal Manometry Measures Are More Accurate Than Conventional Measures in Detecting Anal Hypocontractility in Women With Fecal Incontinence. Carrington EV; Knowles CH; Grossi U; Scott SM Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Feb; 17(3):477-485.e9. PubMed ID: 29966707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]