132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31141184)
21.
Hammarén MM; Luukinen H; Sillanpää A; Remans K; Lapouge K; Custódio T; Löw C; Myllymäki H; Montonen T; Seeger M; Robertson J; Nyman TA; Savijoki K; Parikka M
mSystems; 2023 Jun; 8(3):e0107322. PubMed ID: 37184670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Decoding the proteomic changes involved in the biofilm formation of Enterococcus faecalis SK460 to elucidate potential biofilm determinants.
Suryaletha K; Narendrakumar L; John J; Radhakrishnan MP; George S; Thomas S
BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):146. PubMed ID: 31253082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Using the underlying biological organization of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis functional network for protein function prediction.
Mazandu GK; Mulder NJ
Infect Genet Evol; 2012 Jul; 12(5):922-32. PubMed ID: 22085822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparative proteomic analysis of biofilm and planktonic cells of Lactobacillus plantarum DB200.
De Angelis M; Siragusa S; Campanella D; Di Cagno R; Gobbetti M
Proteomics; 2015 Jul; 15(13):2244-57. PubMed ID: 25728239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Biofilm formation of Streptococcus equi ssp. zooepidemicus and comparative proteomic analysis of biofilm and planktonic cells.
Yi L; Wang Y; Ma Z; Zhang H; Li Y; Zheng JX; Yang YC; Fan HJ; Lu CP
Curr Microbiol; 2014 Sep; 69(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 24696150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Portrait of a pathogen: the Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteome in vivo.
Kruh NA; Troudt J; Izzo A; Prenni J; Dobos KM
PLoS One; 2010 Nov; 5(11):e13938. PubMed ID: 21085642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Proteome approaches combined with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy revealed a distinctive biofilm physiology in Bordetella pertussis.
Serra DO; Lücking G; Weiland F; Schulz S; Görg A; Yantorno OM; Ehling-Schulz M
Proteomics; 2008 Dec; 8(23-24):4995-5010. PubMed ID: 18972542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A quantitative proteomic analysis of biofilm adaptation by the periodontal pathogen Tannerella forsythia.
Pham TK; Roy S; Noirel J; Douglas I; Wright PC; Stafford GP
Proteomics; 2010 Sep; 10(17):3130-41. PubMed ID: 20806225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Pili contribute to biofilm formation in vitro in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Ramsugit S; Guma S; Pillay B; Jain P; Larsen MH; Danaviah S; Pillay M
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2013 Nov; 104(5):725-35. PubMed ID: 23907521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Proteomic changes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv under hyperglycemic conditions favour its growth through altered expression of Tgs3(Rv3234c) and supportive proteins (Rv0547c, AcrA1 and Mpa).
Kundu J; Verma A; Verma I; Bhadada SK; Sharma S
Tuberculosis (Edinb); 2019 Mar; 115():154-160. PubMed ID: 30948171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Quantitative proteomic analysis of sub-MIC erythromycin inhibiting biofilm formation of S. suis in vitro.
Zhao YL; Zhou YH; Chen JQ; Huang QY; Han Q; Liu B; Cheng GD; Li YH
J Proteomics; 2015 Feb; 116():1-14. PubMed ID: 25579403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Selective Proteomic Analysis of Antibiotic-Tolerant Cellular Subpopulations in
Babin BM; Atangcho L; van Eldijk MB; Sweredoski MJ; Moradian A; Hess S; Tolker-Nielsen T; Newman DK; Tirrell DA
mBio; 2017 Oct; 8(5):. PubMed ID: 29066549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Identification of proteins associated with Mycobacterium tuberculosis virulence pathway by their polar profile.
Polanco C; Castañón-González JA; Mancilla R; Buhse T; Samaniego JL; Gimbel A
Acta Biochim Pol; 2015; 62(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 26020061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparative proteomic analysis of Listeria monocytogenes exposed to enterocin AS-48 in planktonic and sessile states.
Caballero Gómez N; Abriouel H; Ennahar S; Gálvez A
Int J Food Microbiol; 2013 Oct; 167(2):202-7. PubMed ID: 24135676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Secretory Proteome Analysis of Streptomycin-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis Clinical Isolates.
Sharma D; Bisht D
SLAS Discov; 2017 Dec; 22(10):1229-1238. PubMed ID: 28314116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Influence of cultivation conditions on the proteomic profile of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37RV].
Bespyatykh JA; Manicheva OA; Smolyakov AV; Dogonadze MZ; Zhuravlev VY; Shitikov EA; Ilina EN
Biomed Khim; 2017 Jul; 63(4):334-340. PubMed ID: 28862605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Functional, structural and epitopic prediction of hypothetical proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv: An in silico approach for prioritizing the targets.
Gazi MA; Kibria MG; Mahfuz M; Islam MR; Ghosh P; Afsar MN; Khan MA; Ahmed T
Gene; 2016 Oct; 591(2):442-55. PubMed ID: 27374154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of CwlM on autolysis and biofilm formation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium smegmatis.
Wang C; Zhang Q; Tang X; An Y; Li S; Xu H; Li Y; Wang X; Luan W; Wang Y; Liu M; Yu L
Int J Med Microbiol; 2019 Jan; 309(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 30563740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparative proteomic profiles reveal characteristic Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteins induced by cholesterol during dormancy conditions.
Garcia-Morales L; Leon-Solis L; Monroy-Muñoz IE; Talavera-Paulin M; Serafin-López J; Estrada-Garcia I; Rivera-Gutierrez S; Cerna-Cortes JF; Helguera-Repetto AC; Gonzalez-Y-Merchand JA
Microbiology (Reading); 2017 Aug; 163(8):1237-1247. PubMed ID: 28771131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparative proteomic investigation unravels the pathobiology of Mycobacterium fortuitum biofilm.
Sharma A; Bansal S; Kumari N; Vashistt J; Shrivastava R
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2023 Oct; 107(19):6029-6046. PubMed ID: 37542577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
