200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31141423)
1. A Deep Learning-Based Decision Support Tool for Precision Risk Assessment of Breast Cancer.
He T; Puppala M; Ezeana CF; Huang YS; Chou PH; Yu X; Chen S; Wang L; Yin Z; Danforth RL; Ensor J; Chang J; Patel T; Wong STC
JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2019 May; 3():1-12. PubMed ID: 31141423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Deep Learning Decision Support Tool to Improve Risk Stratification and Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies in BI-RADS 4 Mammograms.
Ezeana CF; He T; Patel TA; Kaklamani V; Elmi M; Brigmon E; Otto PM; Kist KA; Speck H; Wang L; Ensor J; Shih YT; Kim B; Pan IW; Cohen AL; Kelley K; Spak D; Yang WT; Chang JC; Wong STC
Radiol Artif Intell; 2023 Nov; 5(6):e220259. PubMed ID: 38074778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A deep learning model integrating mammography and clinical factors facilitates the malignancy prediction of BI-RADS 4 microcalcifications in breast cancer screening.
Liu H; Chen Y; Zhang Y; Wang L; Luo R; Wu H; Wu C; Zhang H; Tan W; Yin H; Wang D
Eur Radiol; 2021 Aug; 31(8):5902-5912. PubMed ID: 33496829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A bimodal nomogram as an adjunct tool to reduce unnecessary breast biopsy following discordant ultrasonic and mammographic BI-RADS assessment.
Xu Z; Lin Y; Huo J; Gao Y; Lu J; Liang Y; Li L; Jiang Z; Du L; Lang T; Wen G; Li Y
Eur Radiol; 2024 Apr; 34(4):2608-2618. PubMed ID: 37840099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reducing the number of unnecessary biopsies for mammographic BI-RADS 4 lesions through a deep transfer learning method.
Meng M; Li H; Zhang M; He G; Wang L; Shen D
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Jun; 23(1):82. PubMed ID: 37312026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Understanding Clinical Mammographic Breast Density Assessment: a Deep Learning Perspective.
Mohamed AA; Luo Y; Peng H; Jankowitz RC; Wu S
J Digit Imaging; 2018 Aug; 31(4):387-392. PubMed ID: 28932980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A New Computer-Aided Diagnosis System with Modified Genetic Feature Selection for BI-RADS Classification of Breast Masses in Mammograms.
Boumaraf S; Liu X; Ferkous C; Ma X
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():7695207. PubMed ID: 32462017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. External validation of a publicly available computer assisted diagnostic tool for mammographic mass lesions with two high prevalence research datasets.
Benndorf M; Burnside ES; Herda C; Langer M; Kotter E
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4987-96. PubMed ID: 26233224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast composition descriptors: automated measurement development for full field digital mammography.
Fowler EE; Sellers TA; Lu B; Heine JJ
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):113502. PubMed ID: 24320473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of the Kaiser score on clinical decision-making in BI-RADS 4 mammographic calcifications examined with breast MRI.
Wengert GJ; Pipan F; Almohanna J; Bickel H; Polanec S; Kapetas P; Clauser P; Pinker K; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1451-1459. PubMed ID: 31797077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast cancer risk prediction model: a nomogram based on common mammographic screening findings.
Timmers JM; Verbeek AL; IntHout J; Pijnappel RM; Broeders MJ; den Heeten GJ
Eur Radiol; 2013 Sep; 23(9):2413-9. PubMed ID: 23591619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlating mammographic and pathologic findings in clinical decision support using natural language processing and data mining methods.
Patel TA; Puppala M; Ogunti RO; Ensor JE; He T; Shewale JB; Ankerst DP; Kaklamani VG; Rodriguez AA; Wong ST; Chang JC
Cancer; 2017 Jan; 123(1):114-121. PubMed ID: 27571243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Level of suspicion of a mammographic lesion: use of features defined by BI-RADS lexicon and correlation with large-core breast biopsy.
Bérubé M; Curpen B; Ugolini P; Lalonde L; Ouimet-Oliva D
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1998 Aug; 49(4):223-8. PubMed ID: 9709675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 mammograms and the use of stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in a nonacademic community practice.
Mendez A; Cabanillas F; Echenique M; Malekshamran K; Perez I; Ramos E
Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(4):710-4. PubMed ID: 14770425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using automatically extracted information from mammography reports for decision-support.
Bozkurt S; Gimenez F; Burnside ES; Gulkesen KH; Rubin DL
J Biomed Inform; 2016 Aug; 62():224-31. PubMed ID: 27388877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can artificial intelligence replace ultrasound as a complementary tool to mammogram for the diagnosis of the breast cancer?
Mansour S; Kamal R; Hashem L; AlKalaawy B
Br J Radiol; 2021 Dec; 94(1128):20210820. PubMed ID: 34613796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative efficacy study of diagnostic digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography in BI-RADS 4 breast cancer diagnosis.
Ezeana CF; Puppala M; Wang L; Chang JC; Wong STC
Eur J Radiol; 2022 Aug; 153():110361. PubMed ID: 35617870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Scoring System to Stratify Malignancy Risks for Mammographic Microcalcifications Based on Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 5th Edition Descriptors.
Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Eun NL; Choi EJ; Kim JA
Korean J Radiol; 2019 Dec; 20(12):1646-1652. PubMed ID: 31854152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stratification of mammographic computerized analysis by BI-RADS categories.
Lederman R; Leichter I; Buchbinder S; Novak B; Bamberger P; Fields S
Eur Radiol; 2003 Feb; 13(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 12599001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
