These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31141545)

  • 1. Maximum acceptable frequency of lift for combined manual material handling task in Malaysia.
    Widia M; Md Dawal SZ; Yusoff N
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216918. PubMed ID: 31141545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of container size, frequency and extended horizontal reach on maximum acceptable weights of lifting for female industrial workers.
    Ciriello VM
    Appl Ergon; 2007 Jan; 38(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16616883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of box size, frequency of lifting, and height of lift on maximum acceptable weight of lift and heart rate for male university students in Iran.
    Abadi AS; Mazlomi A; Saraji GN; Zeraati H; Hadian MR; Jafari AH
    Electron Physician; 2015 Oct; 7(6):1365-71. PubMed ID: 26516443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maximum acceptable weight of lift by Chinese experienced male manual handlers.
    Wu SP
    Appl Ergon; 1997 Aug; 28(4):237-44. PubMed ID: 9414362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of lifting frequency and technique on physical fatigue with special reference to psychophysical methodology and metabolic rate.
    Garg A; Saxena U
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1979 Oct; 40(10):894-503. PubMed ID: 525616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physical fatigue in high and very high frequency manual materials handling: perceived exertion and physiological indicators.
    Mital A; Foononi-Fard H; Brown ML
    Hum Factors; 1994 Jun; 36(2):219-31. PubMed ID: 8070788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spine loading as a function of lift frequency, exposure duration, and work experience.
    Marras WS; Parakkat J; Chany AM; Yang G; Burr D; Lavender SA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 May; 21(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 16310299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relationship between maximal lifting capacity and maximum acceptable lift in strength-based soldiering tasks.
    Savage RJ; Best SA; Carstairs GL; Ham DJ
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Jul; 26 Suppl 2():S23-9. PubMed ID: 22643137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maximum acceptable weight of lift for side and back lifting.
    Lee K; Waikar A; Aghazadeh F
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1990 Jun; 19(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 2092069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physiological and psychophysical responses in handling maximum acceptable weights under different footwear--floor friction conditions.
    Li KW; Yu RF; Han XL
    Appl Ergon; 2007 May; 38(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 17010302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maximum acceptable repetitive lifting workload by Chinese subjects.
    Zhu ZX; Zhang ZJ
    Ergonomics; 1990 Jul; 33(7):875-84. PubMed ID: 2226423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating lifting tasks using subjective and biomechanical estimates of stress at the lower back.
    Waikar A; Lee K; Aghazadeh F; Parks C
    Ergonomics; 1991 Jan; 34(1):33-47. PubMed ID: 2009848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of the NIOSH guidelines for manual lifting, with special reference to horizontal distance.
    Garg A
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1989 Mar; 50(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 2718909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceived exertion of physical effort for various manual handling tasks.
    Asfour SS; Ayoub MM; Mital A; Bethea NJ
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1983 Mar; 44(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 6846149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychophysical lifting capacity over extended periods.
    Fernandez JE; Ayoub MM; Smith JL
    Ergonomics; 1991 Jan; 34(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 2009847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of task duration on psychophysically-determined maximum acceptable weights and forces.
    Ciriello VM; Snook SH; Blick AC; Wilkinson PL
    Ergonomics; 1990 Feb; 33(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 2354696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Muscular mechanical energy expenditure as a process for detecting potential risks in manual materials handling.
    Gagnon M; Smyth G
    J Biomech; 1991; 24(3-4):191-203. PubMed ID: 2055908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maximum acceptable weights for asymmetric lifting of Chinese females.
    Wu SP
    Appl Ergon; 2003 May; 34(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12737921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acceptable weights and physiological costs of performing combined manual handling tasks in restricted postures.
    Gallagher S
    Ergonomics; 1991 Jul; 34(7):939-52. PubMed ID: 1915255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of background music on maximum acceptable weight of manual lifting tasks.
    Yu R
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2014; 20(3):437-45. PubMed ID: 25189748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.