These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

727 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31142070)

  • 21. No beneficial effect on survival but a decrease in postoperative complications in patients with rectal cancer undergoing robotic surgery: a retrospective cohort study.
    Lei X; Yang L; Huang Z; Shi H; Zhou Z; Tang C; Li T
    BMC Surg; 2021 Sep; 21(1):355. PubMed ID: 34583670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Comparison of complications following open, laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy].
    Lan X; Xi H; Zhang K; Cui J; Li M; Chen L
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 20(2):184-189. PubMed ID: 28226353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Comparison of the mid- and long-term outcomes between natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery with abdominal auxiliary incision in the treatment of rectal cancer based on propensity score matching method].
    Xu S; Zhang H
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Aug; 24(8):698-703. PubMed ID: 34412187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Application of robotic and laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy to gastric cancer patients with body mass index ≥24 kg/m
    Cong T; Liu G; Zhang K; Gao Y; Cui J; Lan X; Teng D; Huo X; Wei B
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 21(3):318-324. PubMed ID: 29577221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lee SH; Kim DH; Lim SW
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Dec; 33(12):1741-1753. PubMed ID: 30187156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Analysis of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery on 162 cases with rectal neoplasms].
    Zhou JJ; Li TG; Lei SL; Chen WD; Liu KJ; Liu B; Yao HL
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):384-389. PubMed ID: 32306607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection compared to open: a propensity-matched analysis of the NCDB (2010-2015).
    Chapman BC; Edgcomb M; Gleisner A; Vogel JD
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4754-4771. PubMed ID: 31728754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
    Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Comparison of the short-term and long-term outcome between robotic gastrectomy and laparoscopic gastrectomy: a propensity score matching analysis].
    Zhang KC; Wei B; Xi HQ; Cui JX; Li JY; Gao YH; Liang WQ; Hu C; Liu Y; Huang XH; Chen L
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Jan; 56(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 29325353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer after Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: Case-Matched Study of Short-Term Outcomes.
    Kim YS; Kim MJ; Park SC; Sohn DK; Kim DY; Chang HJ; Nam BH; Oh JH
    Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jan; 48(1):225-31. PubMed ID: 25779367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with partial preservation of Denonvilliers fascia: a comparative study of short-term efficacy and urinary and erectile function].
    Huang ZK; Chi P; Huang Y
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Apr; 24(4):327-334. PubMed ID: 33878822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Robotic Colorectal Surgery Learning Curve and Case Complexity.
    Shaw DD; Wright M; Taylor L; Bertelson NL; Shashidharan M; Menon P; Menon V; Wood S; Ternent CA
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Oct; 28(10):1163-1168. PubMed ID: 29733247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Does robotic rectal cancer surgery improve the results of experienced laparoscopic surgeons? An observational single institution study comparing 168 robotic assisted with 184 laparoscopic rectal resections.
    Crolla RMPH; Mulder PG; van der Schelling GP
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4562-4570. PubMed ID: 29761276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A Comparison of Pathologic Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Resections for Rectal Cancer Using the ACS-NSQIP Proctectomy-Targeted Database: a Propensity Score Analysis.
    Garfinkle R; Abou-Khalil M; Bhatnagar S; Wong-Chong N; Azoulay L; Morin N; Vasilevsky CA; Boutros M
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2019 Feb; 23(2):348-356. PubMed ID: 30264386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Real-world data analysis of 3012 patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy in a single center over the past 12 years].
    Wang LJ; Li Z; Wang S; Liu HD; Li QY; Li BW; Xu JH; Ge H; Wang WZ; Li FY; He ZY; Zhang DC; Xu H; Yang L; Xu ZK
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Aug; 25(8):716-725. PubMed ID: 35970806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The short-term outcomes of robotic sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: comparison with open and laparoscopic surgery using a propensity score analysis.
    Ishihara S; Kiyomatsu T; Kawai K; Tanaka T; Hata K; Kazama S; Sunami E; Nozawa H; Watanabe T
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1047-1055. PubMed ID: 29687373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Propensity matched analysis of minimally invasive and open radical resection for rectal cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes in elderly/frail patients.
    Li R; Zhou J; Zhao S; Sun L; Fu Y; Zhang C; Sun Q; Wang D
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Mar; 18(1):117. PubMed ID: 38466495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Short-term efficacy of robotic and laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy
    Wang JB; Liu ZY; Chen QY; Zhong Q; Xie JW; Lin JX; Lu J; Cao LL; Lin M; Tu RH; Huang ZN; Lin JL; Zheng HL; Que SJ; Zheng CH; Huang CM; Li P
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Oct; 25(37):5641-5654. PubMed ID: 31602164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Grading evaluation of operative complications and analysis of related risk factors in patients with stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer treated by robotic-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery].
    Guo RX; Du JM; Wang PR; Li BJ; Li LX; Wang Q; Bai J
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 55(2):112-119. PubMed ID: 32146740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy in patients with chronic kidney disease: A propensity score-matched comparative analysis of surgical outcomes.
    Takagi T; Kondo T; Tachibana H; Iizuka J; Omae K; Kobayashi H; Yoshida K; Tanabe K
    Int J Urol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):505-510. PubMed ID: 28503809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 37.