133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31143062)
1. Tooth reconstruction in forensic situations through dental materials: An anatomical art.
Jani G; Johnson A
J Forensic Dent Sci; 2018; 10(3):137-142. PubMed ID: 31143062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital tooth reconstruction: An innovative approach in forensic odontology.
Johnson A; Jani G; Pandey A; Patel N
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2019 Dec; 37(3):12-20. PubMed ID: 31894133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Technical note: Intra-alveolar morphology assessed in empty dental sockets of teeth missing post-mortem.
Capeletti LR; Franco A; Reges RV; Silva RF
Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Aug; 277():161-165. PubMed ID: 28648763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reconstruction of root morphology in skeletonized remains with postmortem dental loss.
Smith BC
J Forensic Sci; 1992 Jan; 37(1):176-84. PubMed ID: 1545198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How to do identify single cases according to the quality assurance from IOFOS. The positive identification of an unidentified body by dental parameters: a case of homicide.
Pereira CP; Santos JC
J Forensic Leg Med; 2013 Apr; 20(3):169-73. PubMed ID: 23472797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An in vitro comparison of the shear bond strengths of two different gingiva-colored materials bonded to commercially pure titanium and acrylic artificial teeth.
Elzarug YA; Galburt RB; Ali A; Finkelman M; Dam HG
J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):313-9. PubMed ID: 24521462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions.
Zarauz C; Valverde A; Martinez-Rus F; Hassan B; Pradies G
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 May; 20(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 26362778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of different impression techniques on the dimensional accuracy of impressions using various elastomeric impression materials: an in vitro study.
Singh K; Sahoo S; Prasad KD; Goel M; Singh A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jan; 13(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 22430701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digitized slice interposition in forensic dental radiographic identification. An in vitro study.
Wood RE; Tai CC; Blenkinsop B; Johnston D
Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 1994 Mar; 15(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 8166120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vivo study of the marginal integrity of composite resin buildups after full crown preparation.
Wegner SM; Wolfart S; Kern M
J Adhes Dent; 2004; 6(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 15293425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of the impression tray on the accuracy of impressions for crown and bridge work--an investigation and review.
Carrotte PV; Johnson A; Winstanley RB
Br Dent J; 1998 Dec 12-26; 185(11-12):580-5. PubMed ID: 9885431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness.
Persson AS; Odén A; Andersson M; Sandborgh-Englund G
Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 19264353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative dental anatomy in Disaster Victim Identification: Lessons from the 2009 Victorian Bushfires.
Lain R; Taylor J; Croker S; Craig P; Graham J
Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Feb; 205(1-3):36-9. PubMed ID: 20605076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
Caputi S; Varvara G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized controlled clinical study on the accuracy of two-stage putty-and-wash impression materials.
Haim M; Luthardt RG; Rudolph H; Koch R; Walter MH; Quaas S
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 19548415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Implications of choice of products and impression technique on the thickness of the dento-prosthetic interface of the CAD-CAM crowns].
Nasir E; Kamel N; Moussa EH; Hardan L; Zebouni E
Odontostomatol Trop; 2016 Jun; 39(154):25-37. PubMed ID: 30234272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the In Vitro Effects of Cervical Marginal Relocation Using Composite Resins on the Marginal Quality of CAD/CAM Crowns.
Spreafico R; Marchesi G; Turco G; Frassetto A; Di Lenarda R; Mazzoni A; Cadenaro M; Breschi L
J Adhes Dent; 2016; 18(4):355-62. PubMed ID: 27419242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro study of the number of surface defects in monophase and two-phase addition silicone impressions.
Millar BJ; Dunne SM; Robinson PB
J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Jul; 80(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 9656175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dental Evidence in Forensic Identification - An Overview, Methodology and Present Status.
Krishan K; Kanchan T; Garg AK
Open Dent J; 2015; 9():250-6. PubMed ID: 26312096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
Yengopal V; Harneker SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr; (2):CD004483. PubMed ID: 19370602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
