These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31143460)

  • 1. Neuroscience, criminal responsibility and sentencing in an islamic country: Iran.
    Alimardani A
    J Law Biosci; 2018 Dec; 5(3):724-742. PubMed ID: 31143460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Neuroscience in the Courtroom: From responsibility to dangerousness, ethical issues raised by the new French law].
    Gkotsi GM; Moulin V; Gasser J
    Encephale; 2015 Oct; 41(5):385-93. PubMed ID: 25439859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neuroscience in forensic psychiatry: From responsibility to dangerousness. Ethical and legal implications of using neuroscience for dangerousness assessments.
    Gkotsi GM; Gasser J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 46():58-67. PubMed ID: 27209602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 'My Brain Made Me Do It?' Reflections on the Role of Neuroscience in Assessing Criminal Responsibility - A South African Medico-legal Perspective.
    Stevens GP
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2020; 27(2):202-213. PubMed ID: 32944122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An empirical study of the use of neuroscience in sentencing in New South Wales, Australia.
    Alimardani A
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1228354. PubMed ID: 37674754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of neuroscientific evidence in Canadian criminal proceedings.
    Chandler JA
    J Law Biosci; 2015 Nov; 2(3):550-579. PubMed ID: 27774212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Criminal Responsibility and Neuroscience: No Revolution Yet.
    Bigenwald A; Chambon V
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1406. PubMed ID: 31316418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Loss of free will in the Iranian criminal justice system: Interdisciplinary analysis of law and neuroscience.
    Petoft A; Abbasi M; Zali A
    Soc Neurosci; 2023 Dec; 18(5):292-296. PubMed ID: 37534859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Real Neurolaw in the Netherlands: The Role of the Developing Brain in the New Adolescent Criminal Law.
    Schleim S
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1762. PubMed ID: 32849043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neurolaw: Challenges and limits.
    Morse SJ
    Handb Clin Neurol; 2023; 197():235-250. PubMed ID: 37633713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neuroscientific and behavioral genetic information in criminal cases in the Netherlands.
    de Kogel CH; Westgeest EJ
    J Law Biosci; 2015 Nov; 2(3):580-605. PubMed ID: 27774213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The burgeoning recognition and accommodation of the social supply of drugs in international criminal justice systems: An eleven-nation comparative overview.
    Coomber R; Moyle L; Belackova V; Decorte T; Hakkarainen P; Hathaway A; Laidler KJ; Lenton S; Murphy S; Scott J; Stefunkova M; van de Ven K; Vlaemynck M; Werse B
    Int J Drug Policy; 2018 Aug; 58():93-103. PubMed ID: 29890504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of neurobiological evidence in sentencing mitigation.
    Khalid Z; Lee R; Wall BW
    Behav Sci Law; 2024; 42(2):65-78. PubMed ID: 38263548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of neuroscientific evidence on sentencing depends on how one conceives of reasons for incarceration.
    Perricone A; Baskin-Sommers A; Ahn WK
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0276237. PubMed ID: 36322534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neuroscientific and Genetic Evidence in Criminal Cases: A Double-Edged Sword in Germany but Not in the United States?
    Guillen Gonzalez D; Bittlinger M; Erk S; Müller S
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2343. PubMed ID: 31681122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Issues pertaining to expert evidence and the reasoning about punishment in a neuroscience-based sentencing appeal.
    McCay A; Ryan CJ
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 65():101409. PubMed ID: 30591221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Behavioral and neural impairments of frontotemporal dementia: Potential implications for criminal responsibility and sentencing.
    Berryessa CM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 46():1-6. PubMed ID: 27039661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What does recent neuroscience tell us about criminal responsibility?
    Maoz U; Yaffe G
    J Law Biosci; 2016 Apr; 3(1):120-139. PubMed ID: 27774235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Causality in criminal forensic and in civil disability cases: Legal and psychological comparison.
    Young G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():114-20. PubMed ID: 26325348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The United Nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities, neuroscience, and criminal legal capacity.
    Barsky BA; Stein MA
    J Law Biosci; 2023; 10(1):lsad010. PubMed ID: 37214222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.