BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31143623)

  • 1. Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Radical Abdominal Hysterectomy in Early Cervical Cancer in Singapore.
    Lim TYK; Lin KKM; Wong WL; Aggarwal IM; Yam PKL
    Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther; 2019; 8(2):53-58. PubMed ID: 31143623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Total laparoscopic Wertheim's radical hysterectomy versus Wertheim's radical abdominal hysterectomy in the management of stage I cervical cancer in Singapore: a pilot study.
    Lim YK; Chia YN; Yam KL
    Singapore Med J; 2013 Dec; 54(12):683-8. PubMed ID: 24356754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Surgical Morbidity And Oncological Outcome Of Total Laparoscopic Radical Trachelectomy Versus Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy For Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Study With 11-Year Follow-Up.
    Lu Q; Zhang Z; Xiao M; Liu C; Zhang Z
    Onco Targets Ther; 2019; 12():7941-7947. PubMed ID: 31576149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
    Steed H; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; De Petrillo D; Covens A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jun; 93(3):588-93. PubMed ID: 15196849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy Results in Better Surgical Outcomes Compared With the Traditional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer.
    Nie JC; Yan AQ; Liu XS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Nov; 27(9):1990-1999. PubMed ID: 28858908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surgical and oncological outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in obese women with early-stage cervical cancer.
    Moss EL; Balega J; Chan KK; Singh K
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jan; 22(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 22080890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer.
    Kanao H; Matsuo K; Aoki Y; Tanigawa T; Nomura H; Okamoto S; Takeshima N
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e71. PubMed ID: 30887768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of early cervical cancer.
    Kucukmetin A; Biliatis I; Naik R; Bryant A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Oct; 2013(10):CD006651. PubMed ID: 24085528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer.
    Protopapas A; Jardon K; Bourdel N; Botchorishvili R; Rabischong B; Mage G; Canis M
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2009 May; 19(4):712-22. PubMed ID: 19509577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our experience.
    Malzoni M; Tinelli R; Cosentino F; Fusco A; Malzoni C
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 16(5):1316-23. PubMed ID: 19224286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of survival outcome of open, total laparoscopic, and laparoscopy-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy for stage IB2 cervical cancer patients: A multicenter retrospective study.
    Yoon HJ; Kwon BS; Rho HJ; Lee TH; Jeong DH; Kim KH; Suh DS; Song YJ
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Mar; 103(10):e37426. PubMed ID: 38457577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robot versus laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a comparison of the intraoperative and perioperative results of a single surgeon's initial experience.
    Chong GO; Lee YH; Hong DG; Cho YL; Park IS; Lee YS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1145-9. PubMed ID: 23748178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Oncologic outcomes of early stage cervical cancer performed operation by different laparoscopic surgical procedures: analysis of clinical data from mutiple centers].
    Ling KJ; Wang YZ; Zhang H; Zhang XY; Yang JJ; Luo CY; Song B; Zhang WX; Deng L; Chen GL; Li YD; Hu QY; Chen Y; Wang X; Zhang J; Ding JX; Ren T; Kang S; Hua KQ; Xiang Y; Cheng WW; Liang ZQ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):617-623. PubMed ID: 32957750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical carcinoma (stages IIB, IIA and bulky stages IB) after concurrent chemoradiation therapy: surgical morbidity and oncological results.
    Colombo PE; Bertrand MM; Gutowski M; Mourregot A; Fabbro M; Saint-Aubert B; Quenet F; Gourgou S; Kerr C; Rouanet P
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Sep; 114(3):404-9. PubMed ID: 19555996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy vs. radical abdominal hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a match controlled study.
    Jackson KS; Das N; Naik R; Lopes AD; Godfrey KA; Hatem MH; Monaghan JM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Dec; 95(3):655-61. PubMed ID: 15581978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study.
    Tinelli R; Malzoni M; Cosentino F; Perone C; Fusco A; Cicinelli E; Nezhat F
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Sep; 18(9):2622-8. PubMed ID: 21394663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Robotic and laparoscopic Radical type-B and C hysterectomy for cervical cancer: Long term-outcomes.
    Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Loverro M; Pirovano C; Fachechi G; Corso S; Trojano G
    Acta Biomed; 2017 Oct; 88(3):289-296. PubMed ID: 29083333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does Vaginal Cuff Creation and Avoidance of a Uterine Manipulator Improve the Prognosis of Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early Cervical Cancer? A Retrospective Multicenter Study.
    Kondo E; Yoshida K; Kubo-Kaneda M; Nii M; Okamoto K; Magawa S; Nimua R; Okumura A; Okugawa T; Yamawaki T; Nagao K; Yoshimura K; Watashige N; Yanoh K; Ikeda T
    Cancers (Basel); 2022 Sep; 14(18):. PubMed ID: 36139549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A case-controlled study of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in a fellowship training program.
    Zakashansky K; Chuang L; Gretz H; Nagarsheth NP; Rahaman J; Nezhat FR
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2007; 17(5):1075-82. PubMed ID: 17386041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Total laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in stage IA2-IB1 cervical cancer: disease recurrence and survival comparison.
    Toptas T; Simsek T
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2014 Jun; 24(6):373-8. PubMed ID: 24742012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.