BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31143927)

  • 1. PRECOG: PREdicting COupling probabilities of G-protein coupled receptors.
    Singh G; Inoue A; Gutkind JS; Russell RB; Raimondi F
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Jul; 47(W1):W395-W401. PubMed ID: 31143927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The G protein database, GproteinDb.
    Pándy-Szekeres G; Esguerra M; Hauser AS; Caroli J; Munk C; Pilger S; Keserű GM; Kooistra AJ; Gloriam DE
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2022 Jan; 50(D1):D518-D525. PubMed ID: 34570219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A method for the prediction of GPCRs coupling specificity to G-proteins using refined profile Hidden Markov Models.
    Sgourakis NG; Bagos PG; Papasaikas PK; Hamodrakas SJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():104. PubMed ID: 15847681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A naive Bayes model to predict coupling between seven transmembrane domain receptors and G-proteins.
    Cao J; Panetta R; Yue S; Steyaert A; Young-Bellido M; Ahmad S
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Jan; 19(2):234-40. PubMed ID: 12538244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A synthetic method to assay adhesion-family G-protein coupled receptors. Determination of the G-protein coupling profile of ADGRG6(GPR126).
    Lizano E; Hayes JL; Willard FS
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2021 Jan; 534():317-322. PubMed ID: 33248691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting the coupling specificity of GPCRs to G-proteins by support vector machines.
    Guan CP; Jiang ZR; Zhou YH
    Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 3(4):247-51. PubMed ID: 16689694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Structural features of activated GPCR signaling complexes.
    Wang J; Hua T; Liu ZJ
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2020 Aug; 63():82-89. PubMed ID: 32485565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interactions of the α-subunits of heterotrimeric G-proteins with GPCRs, effectors and RGS proteins: a critical review and analysis of interacting surfaces, conformational shifts, structural diversity and electrostatic potentials.
    Baltoumas FA; Theodoropoulou MC; Hamodrakas SJ
    J Struct Biol; 2013 Jun; 182(3):209-18. PubMed ID: 23523730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical analysis and prediction of functional residues effective for GPCR-G-protein coupling selectivity.
    Muramatsu T; Suwa M
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2006 Jun; 19(6):277-83. PubMed ID: 16565146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. GPCRdb in 2018: adding GPCR structure models and ligands.
    Pándy-Szekeres G; Munk C; Tsonkov TM; Mordalski S; Harpsøe K; Hauser AS; Bojarski AJ; Gloriam DE
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Jan; 46(D1):D440-D446. PubMed ID: 29155946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting GPCR-G-protein coupling using hidden Markov models.
    Sreekumar KR; Huang Y; Pausch MH; Gulukota K
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Dec; 20(18):3490-9. PubMed ID: 15297294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tethered agonist exposure in intact adhesion/class B2 GPCRs through intrinsic structural flexibility of the GAIN domain.
    Beliu G; Altrichter S; Guixà-González R; Hemberger M; Brauer I; Dahse AK; Scholz N; Wieduwild R; Kuhlemann A; Batebi H; Seufert F; Pérez-Hernández G; Hildebrand PW; Sauer M; Langenhan T
    Mol Cell; 2021 Mar; 81(5):905-921.e5. PubMed ID: 33497605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Structural features of the G-protein/GPCR interactions.
    Moreira IS
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2014 Jan; 1840(1):16-33. PubMed ID: 24016604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. GPCR activation: protonation and membrane potential.
    Zhang XC; Sun K; Zhang L; Li X; Cao C
    Protein Cell; 2013 Oct; 4(10):747-60. PubMed ID: 24057762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Motions around conserved helical weak spots facilitate GPCR activation.
    Bibbe JM; Vriend G
    Proteins; 2021 Nov; 89(11):1577-1586. PubMed ID: 34272892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Active state structures of G protein-coupled receptors highlight the similarities and differences in the G protein and arrestin coupling interfaces.
    Carpenter B; Tate CG
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2017 Aug; 45():124-132. PubMed ID: 28482214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abundance and stability of complexes containing inactive G protein-coupled receptors and G proteins.
    Qin K; Sethi PR; Lambert NA
    FASEB J; 2008 Aug; 22(8):2920-7. PubMed ID: 18434433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Structural mechanism of G protein activation by G protein-coupled receptor.
    Duc NM; Kim HR; Chung KY
    Eur J Pharmacol; 2015 Sep; 763(Pt B):214-22. PubMed ID: 25981300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of the coupling specificity of G protein coupled receptors to their G proteins.
    Möller S; Vilo J; Croning MD
    Bioinformatics; 2001; 17 Suppl 1():S174-81. PubMed ID: 11473007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mini-G proteins: Novel tools for studying GPCRs in their active conformation.
    Nehmé R; Carpenter B; Singhal A; Strege A; Edwards PC; White CF; Du H; Grisshammer R; Tate CG
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175642. PubMed ID: 28426733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.