212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31144018)
1. Synoptic reporting increases quality of upper gastrointestinal cancer pathology reports.
Baranov NS; Nagtegaal ID; van Grieken NCT; Verhoeven RHA; Voorham QJM; Rosman C; van der Post RS
Virchows Arch; 2019 Aug; 475(2):255-259. PubMed ID: 31144018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What impact has the introduction of a synoptic report for rectal cancer had on reporting outcomes for specialist gastrointestinal and nongastrointestinal pathologists?
Messenger DE; McLeod RS; Kirsch R
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1471-5. PubMed ID: 22032575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Functional Assessment of Synoptic Pathology Reporting for Ovarian Cancer.
Słodkowska J; Cierniak S; Patera J; Kopik J; Baranowski W; Markiewicz T; Murawski P; Buda I; Kozłowski W
Pathobiology; 2016; 83(2-3):70-8. PubMed ID: 27100104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of implementing synoptic pathology reporting in cancer diagnosis: a systematic review.
Sluijter CE; van Lonkhuijzen LR; van Slooten HJ; Nagtegaal ID; Overbeek LI
Virchows Arch; 2016 Jun; 468(6):639-49. PubMed ID: 27097810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of template-based synoptic reporting on completeness of surgical pathology reports.
Schaad N; Berezowska S; Perren A; Hewer E
Virchows Arch; 2024 Jan; 484(1):31-36. PubMed ID: 37017774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Standardized synoptic cancer pathology reporting: a population-based approach.
Srigley JR; McGowan T; Maclean A; Raby M; Ross J; Kramer S; Sawka C
J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jun; 99(8):517-24. PubMed ID: 19466743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Uptake and impact of synoptic reporting in a community care setting.
Eng JL; Baliski CR; McGahan C; Cai E
Am J Surg; 2018 May; 215(5):857-861. PubMed ID: 29496204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality Assessment of Gallbladder Cancer Pathology Reports: A Dutch Nationwide Study.
de Bitter TJJ; de Savornin-Lohman EAJ; de Reuver PR; Versteeg VS; Vink-Börger E; Verheij J; Nagtegaal ID; van der Post RS
Cancers (Basel); 2021 Jun; 13(12):. PubMed ID: 34198644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Establishing Synoptic Cancer Pathology Reporting in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Nicaraguan Experience.
Valverde L D; Reznichek RC; Torres S M
JCO Glob Oncol; 2022 Feb; 8():e1900343. PubMed ID: 35157509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of standardized structured reporting of pathology reports for breast cancer care.
Snoek JAA; Nagtegaal ID; Siesling S; van den Broek E; van Slooten HJ; Hugen N
Breast; 2022 Dec; 66():178-182. PubMed ID: 36308925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Synoptic reporting improves histopathological assessment of pancreatic resection specimens.
Gill AJ; Johns AL; Eckstein R; Samra JS; Kaufman A; Chang DK; Merrett ND; Cosman PH; Smith RC; Biankin AV; Kench JG;
Pathology; 2009 Feb; 41(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 19320058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Standardized structured reports for gastrointestinal tumors].
Hewer E; Rump A; Langer R
Pathologe; 2022 Feb; 43(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 34609569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Standardized synoptic cancer pathology reports - so what and who cares? A population-based satisfaction survey of 970 pathologists, surgeons, and oncologists.
Lankshear S; Srigley J; McGowan T; Yurcan M; Sawka C
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Nov; 137(11):1599-602. PubMed ID: 23432456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Postsurgical pathology reporting of thyroid cancer in New South Wales, Australia.
Kahn C; Simonella L; Sywak M; Boyages S; Ung O; O'Connell D
Thyroid; 2012 Jun; 22(6):604-10. PubMed ID: 22524497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electronic synoptic reporting: assessing the completeness of synoptic and narrative reports for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
Vergis A; Stogryn SE; Mullan MJ; Hardy K
Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2017 Nov; 13(11):1863-1868. PubMed ID: 28433464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pathology reporting of breast cancer: trends in 1989-1999, following the introduction of mammographic screening in Western Australia.
Harvey JM; Sterrett GF; McEvoy S; Fritschi L; Jamrozik K; Ingram D; Joseph D; Dewar J; Byrne MJ;
Pathology; 2005 Oct; 37(5):341-6. PubMed ID: 16194843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Accuracy and Speed of Information Identification by Nonpathologists in Synoptic Reports With Different Formats.
Renshaw AA; Gould EW
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 141(3):418-422. PubMed ID: 28055242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Synoptic Reporting by Summarizing Cancer Pathology Reports using Large Language Models.
Rajaganapathy S; Chowdhury S; Buchner V; He Z; Jiang X; Yang P; Cerhan JR; Zong N
medRxiv; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38746270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of template format on the completeness of surgical pathology reports.
Renshaw SA; Mena-Allauca M; Touriz M; Renshaw A; Gould EW
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Jan; 138(1):121-4. PubMed ID: 24377820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Practical neuropathology synoptic reporting for central nervous system tumors.
Becher MW
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Jun; 135(6):789-92. PubMed ID: 21631274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
