182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31144251)
1. Comparison of common spatial interpolation methods for analyzing pollutant spatial distributions at contaminated sites.
Qiao P; Li P; Cheng Y; Wei W; Yang S; Lei M; Chen T
Environ Geochem Health; 2019 Dec; 41(6):2709-2730. PubMed ID: 31144251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of predicting spatial contaminant distributions at industrial sites using partitioned interpolation method.
Qiao P; Yang S; Wei W; Li P; Cheng Y; Liang S; Lei M; Chen T
Environ Geochem Health; 2021 Jan; 43(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 32696201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing ordinary kriging and inverse distance weighting for soil as pollution in Beijing.
Qiao P; Lei M; Yang S; Yang J; Guo G; Zhou X
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Jun; 25(16):15597-15608. PubMed ID: 29572743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the common spatial interpolation methods used to analyze potentially toxic elements surrounding mining regions.
Ding Q; Wang Y; Zhuang D
J Environ Manage; 2018 Apr; 212():23-31. PubMed ID: 29427938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Spatial distribution prediction of surface soil Pb in a battery contaminated site].
Liu G; Niu JJ; Zhang C; Zhao X; Guo GL
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2014 Dec; 35(12):4712-9. PubMed ID: 25826945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of various spatial interpolation methods for non-stationary regional soil mercury content].
Hu KL; Li BG; Lu YZ; Zhang FR
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2004 May; 25(3):132-7. PubMed ID: 15327270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy and uncertainty analysis of soil Bbf spatial distribution estimation at a coking plant-contaminated site based on normalization geostatistical technologies.
Liu G; Niu J; Zhang C; Guo G
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Dec; 22(24):20121-30. PubMed ID: 26300353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spatial distribution of soil heavy metal pollution estimated by different interpolation methods: accuracy and uncertainty analysis.
Xie Y; Chen TB; Lei M; Yang J; Guo QJ; Song B; Zhou XY
Chemosphere; 2011 Jan; 82(3):468-76. PubMed ID: 20970158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of four methods for spatial interpolation of estimated atmospheric nitrogen deposition in South China.
Qu L; Xiao H; Zheng N; Zhang Z; Xu Y
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Jan; 24(3):2578-2588. PubMed ID: 27826827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimizing spatial interpolation method and sampling number for predicting cadmium distribution in the largest shallow lake of North China.
Wen L; Zhang L; Bai J; Wang Y; Wei Z; Liu H
Chemosphere; 2022 Dec; 309(Pt 2):136789. PubMed ID: 36223825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimization of spatial prediction and sampling strategy of site contamination based on Thiessen polygon coupling interpolation.
Liu X; Zheng L; Li Z; Liu F; Obin N
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jul; 30(32):78959-78972. PubMed ID: 37278892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of different interpolation methods and sequential Gaussian simulation to estimate volumes of soil contaminated by As, Cr, Cu, PCP and dioxins/furans.
Metahni S; Coudert L; Gloaguen E; Guemiza K; Mercier G; Blais JF
Environ Pollut; 2019 Sep; 252(Pt A):409-419. PubMed ID: 31158669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An improved non-stationary geostatistical method for three-dimensional interpolation of Benzo(a)pyrene at a contaminated site.
Li Y; Hou Y; Tao H; Cao H; Liu X; Wang Z; Liao X
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Sep; 838(Pt 2):156169. PubMed ID: 35613641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison on the methods for spatial interpolation of the annual average precipitation in the Loess Plateau region].
Yu Y; Wei W; Chen LD; Yang L; Zhang HD
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2015 Apr; 26(4):999-1006. PubMed ID: 26259439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Spatial Interpolation Methods and Pollution Assessment of Heavy Metals of Soil in Typical Areas].
Ma HH; Yu T; Yang ZF; Hou QY; Zeng QL; Wang R
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2018 Oct; 39(10):4684-4693. PubMed ID: 30229617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of Normalization Methods on Accuracy of Estimating Low- and High-Molecular Weight PAHs Distribution in the Soils of a Coking Plant.
Yuan Y; Yang K; Cheng L; Bai Y; Wang Y; Hou Y; Ding A
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Nov; 19(23):. PubMed ID: 36497545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A novel interpolation method to predict soil heavy metals based on a genetic algorithm and neural network model.
Yin G; Chen X; Zhu H; Chen Z; Su C; He Z; Qiu J; Wang T
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jun; 825():153948. PubMed ID: 35219652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dataset characteristics influence the performance of different interpolation methods for soil salinity spatial mapping.
Fazeli Sangani M; Namdar Khojasteh D; Owens G
Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Oct; 191(11):684. PubMed ID: 31659465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving the mapping accuracy of soil heavy metals through an adaptive multi-fidelity interpolation method.
Ju L; Guo S; Ruan X; Wang Y
Environ Pollut; 2023 Aug; 330():121827. PubMed ID: 37187280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Uncertainty analysis of total phosphorus spatial-temporal variations in the Yangtze River Estuary using different interpolation methods.
Liu R; Chen Y; Sun C; Zhang P; Wang J; Yu W; Shen Z
Mar Pollut Bull; 2014 Sep; 86(1-2):68-75. PubMed ID: 25113104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
