These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31146580)

  • 1. Are Sex Differences in Preferences for Physical Attractiveness and Good Earning Capacity in Potential Mates Smaller in Countries With Greater Gender Equality?
    Zhang L; Lee AJ; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
    Evol Psychol; 2019; 17(2):1474704919852921. PubMed ID: 31146580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sex Differences in Mate Preferences Across 45 Countries: A Large-Scale Replication.
    Walter KV; Conroy-Beam D; Buss DM; Asao K; Sorokowska A; Sorokowski P; Aavik T; Akello G; Alhabahba MM; Alm C; Amjad N; Anjum A; Atama CS; Atamtürk Duyar D; Ayebare R; Batres C; Bendixen M; Bensafia A; Bizumic B; Boussena M; Butovskaya M; Can S; Cantarero K; Carrier A; Cetinkaya H; Croy I; Cueto RM; Czub M; Dronova D; Dural S; Duyar I; Ertugrul B; Espinosa A; Estevan I; Esteves CS; Fang L; Frackowiak T; Garduño JC; González KU; Guemaz F; Gyuris P; Halamová M; Herak I; Horvat M; Hromatko I; Hui CM; Jaafar JL; Jiang F; Kafetsios K; Kavčič T; Kennair LEO; Kervyn N; Khanh Ha TT; Khilji IA; Köbis NC; Lan HM; Láng A; Lennard GR; León E; Lindholm T; Linh TT; Lopez G; Van Luot N; Mailhos A; Manesi Z; Martinez R; McKerchar SL; Meskó N; Misra G; Monaghan C; Mora EC; Moya-Garófano A; Musil B; Natividade JC; Niemczyk A; Nizharadze G; Oberzaucher E; Oleszkiewicz A; Omar-Fauzee MS; Onyishi IE; Özener B; Pagani AF; Pakalniskiene V; Parise M; Pazhoohi F; Pisanski A; Pisanski K; Ponciano E; Popa C; Prokop P; Rizwan M; Sainz M; Salkičević S; Sargautyte R; Sarmány-Schuller I; Schmehl S; Sharad S; Siddiqui RS; Simonetti F; Stoyanova SY; Tadinac M; Varella MAC; Vauclair CM; Vega LD; Widarini DA; Yoo G; Zat'ková M; Zupančič M
    Psychol Sci; 2020 Apr; 31(4):408-423. PubMed ID: 32196435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of control of resources on magnitudes of sex differences in human mate preferences.
    Moore F; Cassidy C; Perrett DI
    Evol Psychol; 2010 Dec; 8(4):720-35. PubMed ID: 22947829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Self-Perceived Mate Value, Facial Attractiveness, and Mate Preferences: Do Desirable Men Want It All?
    Arnocky S
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(1):1474704918763271. PubMed ID: 29534596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Being More Educated and Earning More Increases Romantic Interest: Data from 1.8 M Online Daters from 24 Nations.
    Jonason PK; Thomas AG
    Hum Nat; 2022 Jun; 33(2):115-131. PubMed ID: 35380344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of Long-Term Mate Preferences in Iran.
    Atari M
    Evol Psychol; 2017; 15(2):1474704917702459. PubMed ID: 28401792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mate selection preferences: gender differences examined in a national sample.
    Sprecher S; Sullivan Q; Hatfield E
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1994 Jun; 66(6):1074-80. PubMed ID: 8046577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental Evidence for Sex Differences in Sexual Variety Preferences: Support for the Coolidge Effect in Humans.
    Hughes SM; Aung T; Harrison MA; LaFayette JN; Gallup GG
    Arch Sex Behav; 2021 Feb; 50(2):495-509. PubMed ID: 32440927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Men's strategic preferences for femininity in female faces.
    Little AC; Jones BC; Feinberg DR; Perrett DI
    Br J Psychol; 2014 Aug; 105(3):364-81. PubMed ID: 25040006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sex differences in human mate preferences vary across sex ratios.
    Walter KV; Conroy-Beam D; Buss DM; Asao K; Sorokowska A; Sorokowski P; Aavik T; Akello G; Alhabahba MM; Alm C; Amjad N; Anjum A; Atama CS; Duyar DA; Ayebare R; Batres C; Bendixen M; Bensafia A; Bizumic B; Boussena M; Butovskaya M; Can S; Cantarero K; Carrier A; Cetinkaya H; Croy I; Cueto RM; Czub M; Dronova D; Dural S; Duyar I; Ertugrul B; Espinosa A; Estevan I; Esteves CS; Fang L; Frackowiak T; Garduño JC; González KU; Guemaz F; Gyuris P; Halamová M; Herak I; Horvat M; Hromatko I; Hui CM; Jaafar JL; Jiang F; Kafetsios K; Kavčič T; Ottesen Kennair LE; Kervyn N; Khanh Ha TT; Khilji IA; Köbis NC; Lan HM; Láng A; Lennard GR; León E; Lindholm T; Linh TT; Lopez G; Luot NV; Mailhos A; Manesi Z; Martinez R; McKerchar SL; Meskó N; Misra G; Monaghan C; Mora EC; Moya-Garófano A; Musil B; Natividade JC; Niemczyk A; Nizharadze G; Oberzaucher E; Oleszkiewicz A; Omar-Fauzee MS; Onyishi IE; Özener B; Pagani AF; Pakalniskiene V; Parise M; Pazhoohi F; Pisanski A; Pisanski K; Ponciano E; Popa C; Prokop P; Rizwan M; Sainz M; Salkičević S; Sargautyte R; Sarmány-Schuller I; Schmehl S; Sharad S; Siddiqui RS; Simonetti F; Stoyanova SY; Tadinac M; Correa Varella MA; Vauclair CM; Vega LD; Widarini DA; Yoo G; Zaťková MM; Zupančič M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2021 Jul; 288(1955):20211115. PubMed ID: 34284630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sex and age differences in mate-selection preferences.
    Schwarz S; Hassebrauck M
    Hum Nat; 2012 Dec; 23(4):447-66. PubMed ID: 22941269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: what, whether, and why.
    Li NP; Kenrick DT
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Mar; 90(3):468-89. PubMed ID: 16594832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Big two personality and big three mate preferences: similarity attracts, but country-level mate preferences crucially matter.
    Gebauer JE; Leary MR; Neberich W
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Dec; 38(12):1579-93. PubMed ID: 22956293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chinese and UK participants' preferences for physical attractiveness and social status in potential mates.
    Zhang L; Wang H; Lee AJ; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
    R Soc Open Sci; 2019 Nov; 6(11):181243. PubMed ID: 31827812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sex differences in short-term mate preferences and behavioral mimicry: a semi-naturalistic experiment.
    van Straaten I; Engels RC; Finkenauer C; Holland RW
    Arch Sex Behav; 2008 Dec; 37(6):902-11. PubMed ID: 17682936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual differences in valuing mates' physical attractiveness.
    Mathes EW; Bielser A; Cassell T; Summers S; Witowski A
    Psychol Rep; 2006 Oct; 99(2):502-11. PubMed ID: 17153821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection.
    Li NP; Yong JC; Tov W; Sng O; Fletcher GJ; Valentine KA; Jiang YF; Balliet D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):757-76. PubMed ID: 23915041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner?
    Eastwick PW; Finkel EJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Feb; 94(2):245-64. PubMed ID: 18211175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Netflix and Chill? What Sex Differences Can Tell Us About Mate Preferences in (Hypothetical) Booty-Call Relationships.
    March E; Van Doorn G; Grieve R
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(4):1474704918812138. PubMed ID: 30428700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Impact of Health, Wealth, and Attractiveness on Romantic Evaluation from Photographs of Faces.
    Tskhay KO; Clout JM; Rule NO
    Arch Sex Behav; 2017 Nov; 46(8):2365-2376. PubMed ID: 28255792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.