These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31146580)

  • 21. Sex differences in the implications of partner physical attractiveness for the trajectory of marital satisfaction.
    Meltzer AL; McNulty JK; Jackson GL; Karney BR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2014 Mar; 106(3):418-28. PubMed ID: 24128188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The long and short of mistress relationships: Sex-differentiated mate preferences reflect a compromise of mating ideals.
    Choy BKC; Li NP; Tan K
    J Pers; 2023 Apr; 91(2):383-399. PubMed ID: 35567542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How Sexually Dimorphic Are Human Mate Preferences?
    Conroy-Beam D; Buss DM; Pham MN; Shackelford TK
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1082-93. PubMed ID: 26068718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Contrasting Computational Models of Mate Preference Integration Across 45 Countries.
    Conroy-Beam D; Buss DM; Asao K; Sorokowska A; Sorokowski P; Aavik T; Akello G; Alhabahba MM; Alm C; Amjad N; Anjum A; Atama CS; Duyar DA; Ayebare R; Batres C; Bendixen M; Bensafia A; Bizumic B; Boussena M; Butovskaya M; Can S; Cantarero K; Carrier A; Cetinkaya H; Croy I; Cueto RM; Czub M; Dronova D; Dural S; Duyar I; Ertugrul B; Espinosa A; Estevan I; Esteves CS; Fang L; Frackowiak T; Garduño JC; González KU; Guemaz F; Gyuris P; Halamová M; Herak I; Horvat M; Hromatko I; Hui CM; Jaafar JL; Jiang F; Kafetsios K; Kavčič T; Kennair LEO; Kervyn N; Thi Khanh Ha T; Khilji IA; Köbis NC; Lan HM; Láng A; Lennard GR; León E; Lindholm T; Thi Linh T; Lopez G; Van Luot N; Mailhos A; Manesi Z; Martinez R; McKerchar SL; Meskó N; Misra G; Monaghan C; Mora EC; Moya-Garófano A; Musil B; Natividade JC; Niemczyk A; Nizharadze G; Oberzaucher E; Oleszkiewicz A; Omar-Fauzee MS; Onyishi IE; Özener B; Pagani AF; Pakalniskiene V; Parise M; Pazhoohi F; Pisanski A; Pisanski K; Ponciano E; Popa C; Prokop P; Rizwan M; Sainz M; Salkičević S; Sargautyte R; Sarmány-Schuller I; Schmehl S; Sharad S; Siddiqui RS; Simonetti F; Stoyanova SY; Tadinac M; Varella MAC; Vauclair CM; Vega LD; Widarini DA; Yoo G; Zaťková M; Zupančič M
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16885. PubMed ID: 31729413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sociosexual attitudes and dyadic sexual desire independently predict women's preferences for male vocal masculinity.
    O'Connor JJ; Jones BC; Fraccaro PJ; Tigue CC; Pisanski K; Feinberg DR
    Arch Sex Behav; 2014 Oct; 43(7):1343-53. PubMed ID: 24830906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What do women's advertised mate preferences reveal? An analysis of video dating profiles.
    Goetz CD
    Evol Psychol; 2013 May; 11(2):383-91. PubMed ID: 23718946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Role of Vision in the Emergence of Mate Preferences.
    Scheller M; Matorres F; Little AC; Tompkins L; de Sousa AA
    Arch Sex Behav; 2021 Nov; 50(8):3785-3797. PubMed ID: 33851315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Physical attractiveness, attitudes toward career, and mate preferences among young Chinese women.
    Zhang H; Teng F; Chan DK; Zhang D
    Evol Psychol; 2014 Feb; 12(1):97-114. PubMed ID: 24525338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Resources, attractiveness, family commitment; reproductive decisions in human mate choice.
    Bereczkei T; Voros S; Gal A; Bernath L
    Ethology; 1997 Aug; 103(8):681-99. PubMed ID: 12293453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sex Differences in Response to Deception Across Mate-Value Traits of Attractiveness, Job Status, and Altruism in Online Dating.
    Desrochers J; MacKinnon M; Kelly B; Masse B; Arnocky S
    Arch Sex Behav; 2021 Nov; 50(8):3675-3685. PubMed ID: 34664152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Stepping out of the caveman's shadow: nations' gender gap predicts degree of sex differentiation in mate preferences.
    Zentner M; Mitura K
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1176-85. PubMed ID: 22933455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Parent-offspring conflict over mate choice: An experimental study in China.
    Bovet J; Raiber E; Ren W; Wang C; Seabright P
    Br J Psychol; 2018 Nov; 109(4):674-693. PubMed ID: 29943825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The preferred traits of mates in a cross-national study of heterosexual and homosexual men and women: an examination of biological and cultural influences.
    Lippa RA
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Apr; 36(2):193-208. PubMed ID: 17380374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Chinese undergraduates' preferences for altruistic traits in mate selection and personal advertisement: Evidence from Q-sort technique.
    Guo Q; Feng L; Wang M
    Int J Psychol; 2017 Apr; 52(2):145-153. PubMed ID: 26334113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffs.
    Li NP; Bailey JM; Kenrick DT; Linsenmeier JA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Jun; 82(6):947-55. PubMed ID: 12051582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Self-rated attractiveness predicts preferences for sexually dimorphic facial characteristics in a culturally diverse sample.
    Marcinkowska UM; Jones BC; Lee AJ
    Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10905. PubMed ID: 34035393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Correlated male preferences for femininity in female faces and voices.
    Fraccaro PJ; Feinberg DR; DeBruine LM; Little AC; Watkins CD; Jones BC
    Evol Psychol; 2010 Aug; 8(3):447-61. PubMed ID: 22947812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of partner beauty on opposite-sex attractiveness judgments.
    Little AC; Caldwell CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1119-27. PubMed ID: 21901646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The synergistic effect of prosociality and physical attractiveness on mate desirability.
    Ehlebracht D; Stavrova O; Fetchenhauer D; Farrelly D
    Br J Psychol; 2018 Aug; 109(3):517-537. PubMed ID: 29250771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. More than just a pretty face and a hot body: multiple cues in mate-choice.
    Jonason PK; Raulston T; Rotolo A
    J Soc Psychol; 2012; 152(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 22468419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.