332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31146610)
1. Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after elective second cesarean section.
Tekelioğlu M; Karataş S; Güralp O; Murat Alınca C; Ender Yumru A; Tuğ N
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Mar; 34(6):943-947. PubMed ID: 31146610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hydrosonographic assessment of the effects of 2 different suturing techniques on healing of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery.
Sevket O; Ates S; Molla T; Ozkal F; Uysal O; Dansuk R
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Jun; 125(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 24680843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of purse-string uterine suture on scar healing after a cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
Halouani A; Dimassi K; Ben Mansour A; Triki A
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Jul; 5(7):100992. PubMed ID: 37127211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of Single vs. Double Layer Closure of Hysterotomy at the Time of Cesarean Delivery: The Effect on Uterine Scar Thickness.
Bamberg C; Dudenhausen JW; Bujak V; Rodekamp E; Brauer M; Hinkson L; Kalache K; Henrich W
Ultraschall Med; 2018 Jun; 39(3):343-351. PubMed ID: 27626240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
Roberge S; Demers S; Girard M; Vikhareva O; Markey S; Chaillet N; Moore L; Paris G; Bujold E
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):507.e1-507.e6. PubMed ID: 26522861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Longitudinal transvaginal ultrasound evaluation of cesarean scar niche incidence and depth in the first two years after single- or double-layer uterotomy closure: a randomized controlled trial.
Bamberg C; Hinkson L; Dudenhausen JW; Bujak V; Kalache KD; Henrich W
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Dec; 96(12):1484-1489. PubMed ID: 28832909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of cesarean scar after single- and double-layer hysterotomy closure: a prospective cross-sectional study.
Tekiner NB; Çetin BA; Türkgeldi LS; Yılmaz G; Polat İ; Gedikbaşı A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 May; 297(5):1137-1143. PubMed ID: 29397441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hydrosonographic Assessment of the Effect of Two Different Suture Materials on Healing of the Uterine Scar after Cesarean Delivery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
Sevket O; Takmaz T; Ozcan P; Halici BNA; Islek SH
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2021 Apr; 225(2):140-145. PubMed ID: 32588418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrasound cesarean scar assessment one year postpartum in relation to one- or two-layer uterine suture closure.
Hanacek J; Vojtech J; Urbankova I; Krcmar M; Křepelka P; Feyereisl J; Krofta L
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Jan; 99(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 31441500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new technique for uterine incision closure at the time of cesarean section: does it make a difference?
Elkhouly NI; Abdelaal NK; Solyman AE; Elkelani OA; Elbasueny BF; Elhalaby AF
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Apr; 42(3):416-423. PubMed ID: 34155957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The association of endometrial closure during cesarean section to the risk of developing uterine scar defect: a randomized control trial.
Mohr-Sasson A; Castel E; Dadon T; Brandt A; Etinger R; Cohen A; Zajicek M; Haas J; Mashiach R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 May; 309(5):2063-2070. PubMed ID: 38498161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk of uterine niche following single-layer locked versus unlocked uterine closure: a randomized study.
Bayraktar R; Mulayim B; Tamburaci E; Karadag C; Karadag B
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):8210-8216. PubMed ID: 34470144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk of uterine rupture following locked vs unlocked single-layer closure.
Hudic I; Bujold E; Fatusic Z; Roberge S; Mandzic A; Fatusic J
Med Arch; 2012; 66(6):412-4. PubMed ID: 23409524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Morphology of the cesarean section scar in the non-pregnant uterus after one elective cesarean section.
Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(4):174-179. PubMed ID: 28509317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Uterine closure with unlocked suture in cesarean section: Safety and Quality.
Turan GA; Gur EB; Tatar S; Gokduman A; Guclu S
Pak J Med Sci; 2014 May; 30(3):530-4. PubMed ID: 24948973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Di Spiezio Sardo A; Saccone G; McCurdy R; Bujold E; Bifulco G; Berghella V
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 50(5):578-583. PubMed ID: 28070914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An Optimal Uterine Closure Technique for Better Scar Healing and Avoiding Isthmocele in Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Study.
Kalem Z; Kaya AE; Bakırarar B; Basbug A; Kalem MN
J Invest Surg; 2021 Feb; 34(2):148-156. PubMed ID: 31070072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Uterine caesarean closure techniques affect ultrasound findings and maternal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Stegwee SI; Jordans I; van der Voet LF; van de Ven PM; Ket J; Lambalk CB; de Groot C; Hehenkamp W; Huirne J
BJOG; 2018 Aug; 125(9):1097-1108. PubMed ID: 29215795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of adding a second layer to a single unlocked closure of a Cesarean uterine incision: randomized controlled trial.
Bennich G; Rudnicki M; Wilken-Jensen C; Lousen T; Lassen PD; Wøjdemann K
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 47(4):417-22. PubMed ID: 26489989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does Suture Material Affect Uterine Scar Healing After Cesarean Section? Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Başbuğ A; Doğan O; Ellibeş Kaya A; Pulatoğlu Ç; Çağlar M
J Invest Surg; 2019 Dec; 32(8):763-769. PubMed ID: 29667541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
