These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31146610)

  • 1. Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after elective second cesarean section.
    Tekelioğlu M; Karataş S; Güralp O; Murat Alınca C; Ender Yumru A; Tuğ N
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Mar; 34(6):943-947. PubMed ID: 31146610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hydrosonographic assessment of the effects of 2 different suturing techniques on healing of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery.
    Sevket O; Ates S; Molla T; Ozkal F; Uysal O; Dansuk R
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Jun; 125(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 24680843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of purse-string uterine suture on scar healing after a cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
    Halouani A; Dimassi K; Ben Mansour A; Triki A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Jul; 5(7):100992. PubMed ID: 37127211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of Single vs. Double Layer Closure of Hysterotomy at the Time of Cesarean Delivery: The Effect on Uterine Scar Thickness.
    Bamberg C; Dudenhausen JW; Bujak V; Rodekamp E; Brauer M; Hinkson L; Kalache K; Henrich W
    Ultraschall Med; 2018 Jun; 39(3):343-351. PubMed ID: 27626240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
    Roberge S; Demers S; Girard M; Vikhareva O; Markey S; Chaillet N; Moore L; Paris G; Bujold E
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):507.e1-507.e6. PubMed ID: 26522861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Longitudinal transvaginal ultrasound evaluation of cesarean scar niche incidence and depth in the first two years after single- or double-layer uterotomy closure: a randomized controlled trial.
    Bamberg C; Hinkson L; Dudenhausen JW; Bujak V; Kalache KD; Henrich W
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Dec; 96(12):1484-1489. PubMed ID: 28832909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of cesarean scar after single- and double-layer hysterotomy closure: a prospective cross-sectional study.
    Tekiner NB; Çetin BA; Türkgeldi LS; Yılmaz G; Polat İ; Gedikbaşı A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 May; 297(5):1137-1143. PubMed ID: 29397441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hydrosonographic Assessment of the Effect of Two Different Suture Materials on Healing of the Uterine Scar after Cesarean Delivery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Sevket O; Takmaz T; Ozcan P; Halici BNA; Islek SH
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2021 Apr; 225(2):140-145. PubMed ID: 32588418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrasound cesarean scar assessment one year postpartum in relation to one- or two-layer uterine suture closure.
    Hanacek J; Vojtech J; Urbankova I; Krcmar M; Křepelka P; Feyereisl J; Krofta L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Jan; 99(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 31441500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new technique for uterine incision closure at the time of cesarean section: does it make a difference?
    Elkhouly NI; Abdelaal NK; Solyman AE; Elkelani OA; Elbasueny BF; Elhalaby AF
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Apr; 42(3):416-423. PubMed ID: 34155957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The association of endometrial closure during cesarean section to the risk of developing uterine scar defect: a randomized control trial.
    Mohr-Sasson A; Castel E; Dadon T; Brandt A; Etinger R; Cohen A; Zajicek M; Haas J; Mashiach R
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 May; 309(5):2063-2070. PubMed ID: 38498161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk of uterine niche following single-layer locked versus unlocked uterine closure: a randomized study.
    Bayraktar R; Mulayim B; Tamburaci E; Karadag C; Karadag B
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):8210-8216. PubMed ID: 34470144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk of uterine rupture following locked vs unlocked single-layer closure.
    Hudic I; Bujold E; Fatusic Z; Roberge S; Mandzic A; Fatusic J
    Med Arch; 2012; 66(6):412-4. PubMed ID: 23409524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Morphology of the cesarean section scar in the non-pregnant uterus after one elective cesarean section.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
    Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(4):174-179. PubMed ID: 28509317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Uterine closure with unlocked suture in cesarean section: Safety and Quality.
    Turan GA; Gur EB; Tatar S; Gokduman A; Guclu S
    Pak J Med Sci; 2014 May; 30(3):530-4. PubMed ID: 24948973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Di Spiezio Sardo A; Saccone G; McCurdy R; Bujold E; Bifulco G; Berghella V
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 50(5):578-583. PubMed ID: 28070914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Optimal Uterine Closure Technique for Better Scar Healing and Avoiding Isthmocele in Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Study.
    Kalem Z; Kaya AE; Bakırarar B; Basbug A; Kalem MN
    J Invest Surg; 2021 Feb; 34(2):148-156. PubMed ID: 31070072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Uterine caesarean closure techniques affect ultrasound findings and maternal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Stegwee SI; Jordans I; van der Voet LF; van de Ven PM; Ket J; Lambalk CB; de Groot C; Hehenkamp W; Huirne J
    BJOG; 2018 Aug; 125(9):1097-1108. PubMed ID: 29215795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of adding a second layer to a single unlocked closure of a Cesarean uterine incision: randomized controlled trial.
    Bennich G; Rudnicki M; Wilken-Jensen C; Lousen T; Lassen PD; Wøjdemann K
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 47(4):417-22. PubMed ID: 26489989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does Suture Material Affect Uterine Scar Healing After Cesarean Section? Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Başbuğ A; Doğan O; Ellibeş Kaya A; Pulatoğlu Ç; Çağlar M
    J Invest Surg; 2019 Dec; 32(8):763-769. PubMed ID: 29667541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.