173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31146623)
1. A comparison of perceived diagnostic image quality in direct digital panoramic images between standard and advanced external GOP image processing.
Svenson B; Båth M; Karlsson R; Persson B
Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Nov; 77(8):560-565. PubMed ID: 31146623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Can adaptive post-processing of storage phosphor plate panoramic radiographs provide better image quality? A comparison of anatomical image quality of panoramic radiographs before and after adaptive processing.
Svenson B; Båth M; Karlsson R
Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Jul; 77(5):328-333. PubMed ID: 30623704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimization of exposure in panoramic radiography while maintaining image quality using adaptive filtering.
Svenson B; Larsson L; Båth M
Acta Odontol Scand; 2016; 74(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 26478956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The subjective image quality of direct digital and conventional panoramic radiography.
Gijbels F; De Meyer AM; Bou Serhal C; Van den Bossche C; Declerck J; Persoons M; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Investig; 2000 Sep; 4(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 11000322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital radiography: the standard of care.
Samaras CD
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2008 Oct; 29(8):506, 508-9. PubMed ID: 18935789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of dose reduction on the detectability of standardized radiolucent lesions in digital panoramic radiography.
Dula K; Sanderink G; van der Stelt PF; Mini R; Buser D
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Aug; 86(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 9720100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dental digital radiography.
Moore WS
Tex Dent J; 2002 May; 119(5):404-12. PubMed ID: 12046403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The subjective image quality of conventional and digital panoramic radiography among 6 to 10 year old children.
Makris N; Tsiklakis K; Alexiou KE; Vierrou AM; Stefaniotis T
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2006; 31(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 17315805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perception of anatomical structures in digitally filtered and conventional panoramic radiographs: a clinical evaluation.
Baksi BG; Alpöz E; Sogur E; Mert A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Oct; 39(7):424-30. PubMed ID: 20841460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detectability of normal anatomy in digital panoramic radiographs.
Gross H; Nilsson M; Hellén-Halme K
Swed Dent J; 2014; 38(4):179-85. PubMed ID: 25771652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography.
Gavala S; Donta C; Tsiklakis K; Boziari A; Kamenopoulou V; Stamatakis HC
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18448296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality of film-based and digital panoramic radiography.
Molander B; Gröndahl HG; Ekestubbe A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 15140820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The comparison of subjective image quality in conventional and digital panoramic radiography.
Peker I; Toraman AM; Usalan G; Altunkaynak B
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 19336855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of digital image processing artefacts mimicking pathological features associated with restorations.
Brettle D; Carmichael F
Br Dent J; 2011 Aug; 211(4):167-70. PubMed ID: 21869791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of panoramic image quality between a digital radiography storage phosphor system and a film-based system.
Parissis N; Angelopoulos C; Mantegari S; Karamanis S; Masood F; Tsirlis A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Jan; 11(1):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20098961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of two enhancement tools on the assessment of the relationship between third molars and the inferior alveolar canal.
Peixoto LR; Gonzaga AK; Melo SL; Pontual ML; Pontual Ados A; de Melo DP
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 43(5):637-42. PubMed ID: 25887428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Visualization of the superior and inferior borders of the mandibular canal: a comparative study using digital panoramic radiographs and cross-sectional computed tomography images.
Kamrun N; Tetsumura A; Nomura Y; Yamaguchi S; Baba O; Nakamura S; Watanabe H; Kurabayashi T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Apr; 115(4):550-7. PubMed ID: 23522648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A posteriori registration and subtraction of panoramic compared with intraoral radiography.
Deserno TM; Rangarajan JR; Hoffmann J; Brägger U; Mericske-Stern R; Enkling N
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):e39-45. PubMed ID: 19615643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Image salvage in panoramic radiography using histogram optimization.
Ogawa M; Tanimoto K; Kodera Y; Suei Y; Taguchi A; Tomita S; Furuki Y; Fujita M; Wada T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 May; 20(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 1936424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
