448 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31146640)
1. Inferring the direction of a causal link and estimating its effect via a Bayesian Mendelian randomization approach.
Bucur IG; Claassen T; Heskes T
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Apr; 29(4):1081-1111. PubMed ID: 31146640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Profile-likelihood Bayesian model averaging for two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization in the presence of horizontal pleiotropy.
Shapland CY; Zhao Q; Bowden J
Stat Med; 2022 Mar; 41(6):1100-1119. PubMed ID: 35060160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayesian variable selection with a pleiotropic loss function in Mendelian randomization.
Gkatzionis A; Burgess S; Conti DV; Newcombe PJ
Stat Med; 2021 Oct; 40(23):5025-5045. PubMed ID: 34155684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extending Causality Tests with Genetic Instruments: An Integration of Mendelian Randomization with the Classical Twin Design.
Minică CC; Dolan CV; Boomsma DI; de Geus E; Neale MC
Behav Genet; 2018 Jul; 48(4):337-349. PubMed ID: 29882082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression.
Bowden J; Davey Smith G; Burgess S
Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):512-25. PubMed ID: 26050253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Constrained instruments and their application to Mendelian randomization with pleiotropy.
Jiang L; Oualkacha K; Didelez V; Ciampi A; Rosa-Neto P; Benedet AL; Mathotaarachchi S; Richards JB; Greenwood CMT;
Genet Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 43(4):373-401. PubMed ID: 30635941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multivariable Mendelian randomization: the use of pleiotropic genetic variants to estimate causal effects.
Burgess S; Thompson SG
Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 181(4):251-60. PubMed ID: 25632051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Bayesian approach to Mendelian randomization with multiple pleiotropic variants.
Berzuini C; Guo H; Burgess S; Bernardinelli L
Biostatistics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):86-101. PubMed ID: 30084873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mendelian randomization incorporating uncertainty about pleiotropy.
Thompson JR; Minelli C; Bowden J; Del Greco FM; Gill D; Jones EM; Shapland CY; Sheehan NA
Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(29):4627-4645. PubMed ID: 28850703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An efficient and robust approach to Mendelian randomization with measured pleiotropic effects in a high-dimensional setting.
Grant AJ; Burgess S
Biostatistics; 2022 Apr; 23(2):609-625. PubMed ID: 33155035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Challenges and factors that influencing causal inference and interpretation, based on Mendelian randomization studies].
Wang YZ; Shen HB
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 41(8):1231-1236. PubMed ID: 32867428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extending the MR-Egger method for multivariable Mendelian randomization to correct for both measured and unmeasured pleiotropy.
Rees JMB; Wood AM; Burgess S
Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(29):4705-4718. PubMed ID: 28960498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bayesian methods for instrumental variable analysis with genetic instruments ('Mendelian randomization'): example with urate transporter SLC2A9 as an instrumental variable for effect of urate levels on metabolic syndrome.
McKeigue PM; Campbell H; Wild S; Vitart V; Hayward C; Rudan I; Wright AF; Wilson JF
Int J Epidemiol; 2010 Jun; 39(3):907-18. PubMed ID: 20348110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bayesian network analysis incorporating genetic anchors complements conventional Mendelian randomization approaches for exploratory analysis of causal relationships in complex data.
Howey R; Shin SY; Relton C; Davey Smith G; Cordell HJ
PLoS Genet; 2020 Mar; 16(3):e1008198. PubMed ID: 32119656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization.
Burgess S; Small DS; Thompson SG
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2333-2355. PubMed ID: 26282889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pleiotropy-robust Mendelian randomization.
van Kippersluis H; Rietveld CA
Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 47(4):1279-1288. PubMed ID: 28338774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exploiting horizontal pleiotropy to search for causal pathways within a Mendelian randomization framework.
Cho Y; Haycock PC; Sanderson E; Gaunt TR; Zheng J; Morris AP; Davey Smith G; Hemani G
Nat Commun; 2020 Feb; 11(1):1010. PubMed ID: 32081875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Beyond Mendelian randomization: how to interpret evidence of shared genetic predictors.
Burgess S; Butterworth AS; Thompson JR
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():208-16. PubMed ID: 26291580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Bayesian approach to Mendelian randomization using summary statistics in the univariable and multivariable settings with correlated pleiotropy.
Grant AJ; Burgess S
Am J Hum Genet; 2024 Jan; 111(1):165-180. PubMed ID: 38181732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modal-based estimation via heterogeneity-penalized weighting: model averaging for consistent and efficient estimation in Mendelian randomization when a plurality of candidate instruments are valid.
Burgess S; Zuber V; Gkatzionis A; Foley CN
Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 47(4):1242-1254. PubMed ID: 29846613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
