BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31146686)

  • 1. Pairwise efficiency: a new mathematical approach to qPCR data analysis increases the precision of the calibration curve assay.
    Panina Y; Germond A; David BG; Watanabe TM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 May; 20(1):295. PubMed ID: 31146686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Critique of the pairwise method for estimating qPCR amplification efficiency: beware of correlated data!
    Tellinghuisen J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):291. PubMed ID: 32640980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How good is a PCR efficiency estimate: Recommendations for precise and robust qPCR efficiency assessments.
    Svec D; Tichopad A; Novosadova V; Pfaffl MW; Kubista M
    Biomol Detect Quantif; 2015 Mar; 3():9-16. PubMed ID: 27077029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A fixed-point algorithm for estimating amplification efficiency from a polymerase chain reaction dilution series.
    Jones ME; Mayne GC; Wang T; Watson DI; Hussey DJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Dec; 15(1):372. PubMed ID: 25492416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Calibration-free assays on standard real-time PCR devices.
    Debski PR; Gewartowski K; Bajer S; Garstecki P
    Sci Rep; 2017 Mar; 7():44854. PubMed ID: 28327545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantification bias caused by plasmid DNA conformation in quantitative real-time PCR assay.
    Lin CH; Chen YC; Pan TM
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e29101. PubMed ID: 22194997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. PCR-Stop analysis as a new tool for qPCR assay validation.
    Witte AK; Mester P; Fister S; Süß B; Wagner M; Rossmanith P
    Sci Rep; 2018 May; 8(1):8275. PubMed ID: 29844518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficiency Correction Is Required for Accurate Quantitative PCR Analysis and Reporting.
    Ruijter JM; Barnewall RJ; Marsh IB; Szentirmay AN; Quinn JC; van Houdt R; Gunst QD; van den Hoff MJB
    Clin Chem; 2021 Jun; 67(6):829-842. PubMed ID: 33890632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis methods for precision, linearity, and accuracy of estimating amplification efficiency.
    Tellinghuisen J; Spiess AN
    Anal Biochem; 2014 Mar; 449():76-82. PubMed ID: 24365068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of smoothing on parameter estimation in quantitative DNA amplification experiments.
    Spiess AN; Deutschmann C; Burdukiewicz M; Himmelreich R; Klat K; Schierack P; Rödiger S
    Clin Chem; 2015 Feb; 61(2):379-88. PubMed ID: 25477537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Web-based LinRegPCR: application for the visualization and analysis of (RT)-qPCR amplification and melting data.
    Untergasser A; Ruijter JM; Benes V; van den Hoff MJB
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Aug; 22(1):398. PubMed ID: 34433408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Droplet Digital PCR and Real Time PCR Method for HBV DNA Quantification.
    Wongjitrat C; Horthongkham N; Sutthent R; Srisurapanon S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2015 Oct; 98 Suppl 9():S140-5. PubMed ID: 26817223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improved strategies and optimization of calibration models for real-time PCR absolute quantification.
    Sivaganesan M; Haugland RA; Chern EC; Shanks OC
    Water Res; 2010 Sep; 44(16):4726-35. PubMed ID: 20701947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Absolute copy number from the statistics of the quantification cycle in replicate quantitative polymerase chain reaction experiments.
    Tellinghuisen J; Spiess AN
    Anal Chem; 2015 Feb; 87(3):1889-95. PubMed ID: 25582662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Real-time quantitative PCR, pathogen detection and MIQE.
    Johnson G; Nolan T; Bustin SA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 943():1-16. PubMed ID: 23104279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robust and Precise Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction with an Amplification Efficiency-Aware Reaction Kinetics Model.
    Gong L; Yao S; He Y; Liu C
    Anal Chem; 2023 Mar; 95(12):5402-5410. PubMed ID: 36913601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methodological strategies for transgene copy number quantification in goats (Capra hircus) using real-time PCR.
    Batista RI; Luciano MC; Teixeira DI; Freitas VJ; Melo LM; Andreeva LE; Serova IA; Serov OL
    Biotechnol Prog; 2014; 30(6):1390-400. PubMed ID: 25044808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Ultimate qPCR Experiment: Producing Publication Quality, Reproducible Data the First Time.
    Taylor SC; Nadeau K; Abbasi M; Lachance C; Nguyen M; Fenrich J
    Trends Biotechnol; 2019 Jul; 37(7):761-774. PubMed ID: 30654913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Keeping up with advances in qPCR pathogen detection: an example for QPX disease in hard clams.
    Geraci-Yee S; Allam B; Collier JL
    Dis Aquat Organ; 2022 Mar; 148():127-144. PubMed ID: 35356896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of analytic methods for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction data.
    Chen P; Huang X
    J Comput Biol; 2015 Nov; 22(11):988-96. PubMed ID: 26204477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.