203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31147778)
1. Time to revisit? A predator's previous successes and failures in prey capture determine its return time to patches.
Vijayan S; Lee JK; Balaban-Feld J; Mitchell WA; Kotler BP; Rosenzweig ML; Lotan TT; Abramsky Z
Oecologia; 2019 Jun; 190(2):387-397. PubMed ID: 31147778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A predator equalizes rate of capture of a schooling prey in a patchy environment.
Vijayan S; Kotler BP; Abramsky Z
Behav Processes; 2017 May; 138():91-95. PubMed ID: 28232233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How does the presence of a conspecific individual change the behavioral game that a predator plays with its prey?
Vardi R; Abramsky Z; Kotler BP; Altstein O; Rosenzweig ML
Oecologia; 2017 Jul; 184(3):597-607. PubMed ID: 28516320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimal foraging of little egrets and their prey in a foraging game in a patchy environment.
Katz MW; Abramsky Z; Kotler BP; Rosenzweig ML; Alteshtein O; Vasserman G
Am Nat; 2013 Mar; 181(3):381-95. PubMed ID: 23448887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Central-place foraging and ecological effects of an invasive predator across multiple habitats.
Benkwitt CE
Ecology; 2016 Oct; 97(10):2729-2739. PubMed ID: 27859117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. You can't run but you can hide: refuge use in frog tadpoles elicits density-dependent predation by dragonfly larvae.
Hossie TJ; Murray DL
Oecologia; 2010 Jun; 163(2):395-404. PubMed ID: 20130916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What do predators really want? The role of gerbil energetic state in determining prey choice by Barn Owls.
Embar K; Mukherjee S; Kotler BP
Ecology; 2014 Feb; 95(2):280-5. PubMed ID: 24669722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Density-dependent prey mortality is determined by the spatial scale of predator foraging.
McCarthy EK; White JW
Oecologia; 2016 Feb; 180(2):305-11. PubMed ID: 26116266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Social behaviour and foraging success of little egrets (Egretta garzetta).
Vardi R; Kotler BP; Altstein O; Abramsky Z
Behav Processes; 2021 Feb; 183():104318. PubMed ID: 33434628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experimental determination of the spatial scale of a prey patch from the predator's perspective.
Birk MA; White JW
Oecologia; 2014 Mar; 174(3):723-9. PubMed ID: 24241641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Indirect effects of prey swamping: differential seed predation during a bamboo masting event.
Kitzberger T; Chaneton EJ; Caccia F
Ecology; 2007 Oct; 88(10):2541-54. PubMed ID: 18027757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ratio- and predator-dependent functional forms for predators optimally foraging in patches.
Anderson JJ
Am Nat; 2010 Feb; 175(2):240-9. PubMed ID: 20028238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. State-dependent foraging among social fish in a risky environment.
Balaban-Feld J; Mitchell WA; Kotler BP; Vijayan S; Tov Elem LT; Abramsky Z
Oecologia; 2019 May; 190(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 30929073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of density dependent migrations on the dynamics of a predator prey model.
Mchich R; Bergam A; Raïssi N
Acta Biotheor; 2005; 53(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 16583273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Binary patch assessment by goldfish under safe and dangerous conditions.
Vijayan S; Kotler BP; Tamar Tov-Elem L; Mitchell WA; Abramsky Z
Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():417-421. PubMed ID: 30056079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Individual willingness to leave a safe refuge and the trade-off between food and safety: a test with social fish.
Balaban-Feld J; Mitchell WA; Kotler BP; Vijayan S; Tov Elem LT; Rosenzweig ML; Abramsky Z
Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Jul; 286(1907):20190826. PubMed ID: 31311474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The growth-predation risk trade-off under a growing gape-limited predation threat.
Urban MC
Ecology; 2007 Oct; 88(10):2587-97. PubMed ID: 18027761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wading bird foraging on a wetland landscape: a comparison of two strategies.
Lee HW; DeAngelis DL; Yurek S; Tennenbaum S
Math Biosci Eng; 2022 May; 19(8):7687-7718. PubMed ID: 35801441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Increasing availability of palatable prey induces predator-dependence and increases predation on unpalatable prey.
Hossie TJ; Chan K; Murray DL
Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):6763. PubMed ID: 33762642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Foraging strategy mediates ectotherm predator-prey responses to climate warming.
Twardochleb LA; Treakle TC; Zarnetske PL
Ecology; 2020 Nov; 101(11):e03146. PubMed ID: 32726861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
