These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31150740)
21. Identifying specific non-attending groups in breast cancer screening--population-based registry study of participation and socio-demography. Jensen LF; Pedersen AF; Andersen B; Vedsted P BMC Cancer; 2012 Nov; 12():518. PubMed ID: 23151053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Socioeconomic and healthcare use-related determinants of cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening practice in the French West Indies. Menvielle G; Dugas J; Richard JB; Luce D Eur J Cancer Prev; 2018 May; 27(3):269-273. PubMed ID: 27824663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Factors associated with non-participation in cervical cancer screening - A nationwide study of nearly half a million women in Denmark. Harder E; Juul KE; Jensen SM; Thomsen LT; Frederiksen K; Kjaer SK Prev Med; 2018 Jun; 111():94-100. PubMed ID: 29501474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The education gradient in cancer screening participation: a consistent phenomenon across Europe? Willems B; Bracke P Int J Public Health; 2018 Jan; 63(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 29063122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A lack of information engagement among colorectal cancer screening non-attenders: cross-sectional survey. Kobayashi LC; Waller J; von Wagner C; Wardle J BMC Public Health; 2016 Jul; 16():659. PubMed ID: 27473593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Factors Associated with Informed Decisions and Participation in Bowel Cancer Screening among Adults with Lower Education and Literacy. Smith SK; Simpson JM; Trevena LJ; McCaffery KJ Med Decis Making; 2014 Aug; 34(6):756-72. PubMed ID: 24421292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Are German information materials on colorectal cancer screening understandable or do they fail? Rating of health information by users with different educational backgrounds]. Seidel G; Münch I; Dreier M; Borutta B; Walter U; Dierks ML Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2014 Mar; 57(3):366-79. PubMed ID: 24562713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Geographic variation in compliance with Australian colorectal cancer screening programs: the role of attitudinal and cognitive traits. Goodwin BC; March S; Ireland M; Crawford Williams F; Manksi D; Ford M; Dunn J Rural Remote Health; 2019 Jul; 19(3):4957. PubMed ID: 31340653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The effect of primary care physician counseling on participation rate and use of sedation in colonoscopy-based colorectal cancer screening program--a randomized controlled study. Boguradzka A; Wiszniewski M; Kaminski MF; Kraszewska E; Mazurczak-Pluta T; Rzewuska D; Ptasinski A; Regula J Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jul; 49(7):878-84. PubMed ID: 24797871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Predictors of non-participation in cervical screening in Denmark. Kristensson JH; Sander BB; von Euler-Chelpin M; Lynge E Cancer Epidemiol; 2014 Apr; 38(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 24447699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Participation in cervical cancer screening among immigrants and Danish-born women in Denmark. Hertzum-Larsen R; Kjær SK; Frederiksen K; Thomsen LT Prev Med; 2019 Jun; 123():55-64. PubMed ID: 30796926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Adherence to and predictors of participation in colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing in Spain, 2009-2011. Ricardo-Rodrigues I; Jiménez-García R; Hernández-Barrera V; Carrasco-Garrido P; Jiménez-Trujillo I; López-de-Andrés A Eur J Cancer Prev; 2015 Jul; 24(4):305-12. PubMed ID: 25304027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Exploring implications of Medicaid participation and wait times for colorectal screening on early detection efforts in Connecticut--a secret-shopper survey. Patel VB; Nahar R; Murray B; Salner AL Conn Med; 2013 Apr; 77(4):197-203. PubMed ID: 23691732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Citizenship, length of stay, and screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer in women, 2000-2010. Miranda PY; Yao N; Snipes SA; BeLue R; Lengerich E; Hillemeier MM Cancer Causes Control; 2017 Jun; 28(6):589-598. PubMed ID: 28364196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Determinants for Participation in Human Papillomavirus Self-Sampling among Nonattenders to Cervical Cancer Screening in Denmark. Harder E; Thomsen LT; Hertzum-Larsen R; Albieri V; Hessner MV; Juul KE; Bonde J; Frederiksen K; Kjaer SK Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2018 Nov; 27(11):1342-1351. PubMed ID: 30108095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Factors related to longitudinal adherence in colorectal cancer screening: qualitative research findings. Benito L; Farre A; Binefa G; Vidal C; Cardona A; Pla M; García M Cancer Causes Control; 2018 Jan; 29(1):103-114. PubMed ID: 29170881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The influence of total hysterectomy in a cervical cancer screening population: a register-based cross-sectional study. Larsen MB; Mikkelsen EM; Jeppesen U; Svanholm H; Andersen B BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Jun; 17(1):423. PubMed ID: 28633673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Educational level, voluntary private health insurance and opportunistic cancer screening among women in Catalonia (Spain). Borràs JM; Guillen M; Sánchez V; Juncà S; Vicente R Eur J Cancer Prev; 1999 Oct; 8(5):427-34. PubMed ID: 10548398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Alerts in electronic medical records to promote a colorectal cancer screening programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care. Guiriguet C; Muñoz-Ortiz L; Burón A; Rivero I; Grau J; Vela-Vallespín C; Vilarrubí M; Torres M; Hernández C; Méndez-Boo L; Toràn P; Caballeria L; Macià F; Castells A Br J Gen Pract; 2016 Jul; 66(648):e483-90. PubMed ID: 27266861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]