226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31150787)
1. The time-course of component processes of selective attention.
Wen T; Duncan J; Mitchell DJ
Neuroimage; 2019 Oct; 199():396-407. PubMed ID: 31150787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Time Course of Target Template Activation Processes during Preparation for Visual Search.
Grubert A; Eimer M
J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(44):9527-9538. PubMed ID: 30242053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A new method for tracking the preparatory activation of target templates for visual search with high temporal precision.
Dodwell G; Nako R; Eimer M
Psychophysiology; 2024 Aug; 61(8):e14582. PubMed ID: 38641955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preparatory attention in visual cortex.
Battistoni E; Stein T; Peelen MV
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2017 May; 1396(1):92-107. PubMed ID: 28253445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rhythmic Temporal Expectation Boosts Neural Activity by Increasing Neural Gain.
Auksztulewicz R; Myers NE; Schnupp JW; Nobre AC
J Neurosci; 2019 Dec; 39(49):9806-9817. PubMed ID: 31662425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Idiosyncratic Patterns of Representational Similarity in Prefrontal Cortex Predict Attentional Performance.
Lee J; Geng JJ
J Neurosci; 2017 Feb; 37(5):1257-1268. PubMed ID: 28028199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The guidance of visual search by shape features and shape configurations.
McCants CW; Berggren N; Eimer M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1072-1085. PubMed ID: 29494192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Attentional Access to Multiple Target Objects in Visual Search.
Berggren N; Eimer M
J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Feb; 32(2):283-300. PubMed ID: 31560272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Space-by-time decomposition for single-trial decoding of M/EEG activity.
Delis I; Onken A; Schyns PG; Panzeri S; Philiastides MG
Neuroimage; 2016 Jun; 133():504-515. PubMed ID: 27033682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Independent components of magnetoencephalography: single-trial response onset times.
Tang AC; Pearlmutter BA; Malaszenko NA; Phung DB
Neuroimage; 2002 Dec; 17(4):1773-89. PubMed ID: 12498751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Overlapping attentional networks yield divergent behavioral predictions across tasks: Neuromarkers for diffuse and focused attention?
Wu EXW; Liaw GJ; Goh RZ; Chia TTY; Chee AMJ; Obana T; Rosenberg MD; Yeo BTT; Asplund CL
Neuroimage; 2020 Apr; 209():116535. PubMed ID: 31940476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rewarded visual items capture attention only in heterogeneous contexts.
Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Brandhofer R; Schubö A
Psychophysiology; 2016 Jul; 53(7):1063-73. PubMed ID: 26997364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cortical Mechanisms of Prioritizing Selection for Rejection in Visual Search.
Donohue SE; Bartsch MV; Heinze HJ; Schoenfeld MA; Hopf JM
J Neurosci; 2018 May; 38(20):4738-4748. PubMed ID: 29691330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. fMRI-constrained source analysis reveals early top-down modulations of interference processing using a flanker task.
Siemann J; Herrmann M; Galashan D
Neuroimage; 2016 Aug; 136():45-56. PubMed ID: 27181762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Separable mechanisms underlying global feature-based attention.
Bondarenko R; Boehler CN; Stoppel CM; Heinze HJ; Schoenfeld MA; Hopf JM
J Neurosci; 2012 Oct; 32(44):15284-95. PubMed ID: 23115167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Visual information representation and rapid-scene categorization are simultaneous across cortex: An MEG study.
Ramkumar P; Hansen BC; Pannasch S; Loschky LC
Neuroimage; 2016 Jul; 134():295-304. PubMed ID: 27001497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictive distractor context facilitates attentional selection of high, but not intermediate and low, salience targets.
Töllner T; Conci M; Müller HJ
Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Mar; 36(3):935-44. PubMed ID: 25351495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neural Dynamics of Cognitive Control over Working Memory Capture of Attention.
Whitehead PS; Ooi MM; Egner T; Woldorff MG
J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 31(7):1079-1090. PubMed ID: 30938591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Shifting visual attention in space: an electrophysiological analysis using high spatial resolution mapping.
Hopf JM; Mangun GR
Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Jul; 111(7):1241-57. PubMed ID: 10880800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
