234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31150814)
1. Blind deconvolution estimation of an arterial input function for small animal DCE-MRI.
Jiřík R; Taxt T; Macíček O; Bartoš M; Kratochvíla J; Souček K; Dražanová E; Krátká L; Hampl A; Starčuk Z
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Oct; 62():46-56. PubMed ID: 31150814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Semi-parametric arterial input functions for quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in mice.
Taxt T; Reed RK; Pavlin T; Rygh CB; Andersen E; Jiřík R
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Feb; 46():10-20. PubMed ID: 29066294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Distributed capillary adiabatic tissue homogeneity model in parametric multi-channel blind AIF estimation using DCE-MRI.
Kratochvíla J; Jiřík R; Bartoš M; Standara M; Starčuk Z; Taxt T
Magn Reson Med; 2016 Mar; 75(3):1355-65. PubMed ID: 25865576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relative sensitivities of DCE-MRI pharmacokinetic parameters to arterial input function (AIF) scaling.
Li X; Cai Y; Moloney B; Chen Y; Huang W; Woods M; Coakley FV; Rooney WD; Garzotto MG; Springer CS
J Magn Reson; 2016 Aug; 269():104-112. PubMed ID: 27288764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improved reliability of perfusion estimation in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI by using the arterial input function from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.
Tseng CH; Jaspers J; Romero AM; Wielopolski P; Smits M; van Osch MJP; Vos F
NMR Biomed; 2024 Jan; 37(1):e5038. PubMed ID: 37712359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Repeatability of arterial input functions and kinetic parameters in muscle obtained by dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of the head and neck.
Koopman T; Martens RM; Lavini C; Yaqub M; Castelijns JA; Boellaard R; Marcus JT
Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 May; 68():1-8. PubMed ID: 31978517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of two methods for estimating DCE-MRI parameters via individual and cohort based AIFs in prostate cancer: a step towards practical implementation.
Fedorov A; Fluckiger J; Ayers GD; Li X; Gupta SN; Tempany C; Mulkern R; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy FM
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 32(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 24560287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy and precision of quantitative DCE-MRI parameters: How should one estimate contrast concentration?
Wake N; Chandarana H; Rusinek H; Fujimoto K; Moy L; Sodickson DK; Kim SG
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Oct; 52():16-23. PubMed ID: 29777820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for mouse models using automatic detection of the arterial input function.
Kim JH; Im GH; Yang J; Choi D; Lee WJ; Lee JH
NMR Biomed; 2012 Apr; 25(4):674-84. PubMed ID: 21954069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Single-channel blind estimation of arterial input function and tissue impulse response in DCE-MRI.
Taxt T; Jirík R; Rygh CB; Grüner R; Bartos M; Andersen E; Curry FR; Reed RK
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Apr; 59(4):1012-21. PubMed ID: 22217906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Blind deconvolution decreases requirements on temporal resolution of DCE-MRI: Application to 2nd generation pharmacokinetic modeling.
Kratochvíla J; Jiřík R; Bartoš M; Standara M; Starčuk Z; Taxt T
Magn Reson Imaging; 2024 Jun; 109():238-248. PubMed ID: 38508292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimization of two-compartment-exchange-model analysis for dynamic contrast-enhanced mri incorporating bolus arrival time.
Nadav G; Liberman G; Artzi M; Kiryati N; Bashat DB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jan; 45(1):237-249. PubMed ID: 27383624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of prostate cancer DCE-MRI at 3T: comparison of two arterial input functions on cancer detection with digitized whole mount histopathological validation.
Fennessy FM; Fedorov A; Penzkofer T; Kim KW; Hirsch MS; Vangel MG; Masry P; Flood TA; Chang MC; Tempany CM; Mulkern RV; Gupta SN
Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Sep; 33(7):886-94. PubMed ID: 25683515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data without an arterial input function: a reference region model.
Yankeelov TE; Luci JJ; Lepage M; Li R; Debusk L; Lin PC; Price RR; Gore JC
Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 May; 23(4):519-29. PubMed ID: 15919597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of DCE-MRI parameters for brain tumors through implementation of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model approaches for Gd-DOTA.
Spanakis M; Kontopodis E; Van Cauter S; Sakkalis V; Marias K
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Oct; 43(5):529-47. PubMed ID: 27647272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimating the arterial input function from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data with compensation for flow enhancement (II): Applications in spine diagnostics and assessment of crohn's disease.
van Schie JJN; Lavini C; van Vliet LJ; Kramer G; Pieters-van den Bos I; Marcus JT; Stoker J; Vos FM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 47(5):1197-1204. PubMed ID: 29193469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of repeatability and treatment response in early phase clinical trials using DCE-MRI: comparison of parametric analysis using MR- and CT-derived arterial input functions.
Rata M; Collins DJ; Darcy J; Messiou C; Tunariu N; Desouza N; Young H; Leach MO; Orton MR
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):1991-8. PubMed ID: 26385804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parametric mapping using high spatiotemporal resolution Golden-angle RAdial Sparse Parallel MRI and iterative joint estimation of the arterial input function and pharmacokinetic parameters.
Mazaheri Y; Kim N; Lakhman Y; Jafari R; Vargas A; Otazo R
NMR Biomed; 2022 Jul; 35(7):e4718. PubMed ID: 35226774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: II. In vivo results.
Schabel MC; DiBella EV; Jensen RL; Salzman KL
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4807-23. PubMed ID: 20679695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
