89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31150837)
1. Development of practical recommendations for diagnostic accuracy studies in low-prevalence situations.
Holtman GA; Berger MY; Burger H; Deeks JJ; Donner-Banzhoff N; Fanshawe TR; Koshiaris C; Leeflang MM; Oke JL; Perera R; Reitsma JB; Van den Bruel A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Oct; 114():38-48. PubMed ID: 31150837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Variance estimation methods in samples from household surveys].
Porto Alves MC; Silva NN
Rev Saude Publica; 2007 Dec; 41(6):938-46. PubMed ID: 17992355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies.
Rutjes AW; Reitsma JB; Di Nisio M; Smidt N; van Rijn JC; Bossuyt PM
CMAJ; 2006 Feb; 174(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 16477057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Forcing dichotomous disease classification from reference standards leads to bias in diagnostic accuracy estimates: A simulation study.
Jenniskens K; Naaktgeboren CA; Reitsma JB; Hooft L; Moons KGM; van Smeden M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 111():1-10. PubMed ID: 30904568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimating diagnostic accuracy without a gold standard: A continued controversy.
Collins J; Albert PS
J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(6):1078-1082. PubMed ID: 27548004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional saline infusion sonography compared to two-dimensional saline infusion sonography for the diagnosis of focal intracavitary lesions.
Nieuwenhuis LL; Hermans FJ; Bij de Vaate AJM; Leeflang MM; Brölmann HA; Hehenkamp WJ; Mol BWJ; Clark TJ; Huirne JA
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 May; 5(5):CD011126. PubMed ID: 28472862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomized test-treatment studies with an outlook on adaptive designs.
Hot A; Bossuyt PM; Gerke O; Wahl S; Vach W; Zapf A
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Jun; 21(1):110. PubMed ID: 34074263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
Håkonsen SJ; Pedersen PU; Bath-Hextall F; Kirkpatrick P
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 May; 13(4):141-87. PubMed ID: 26447079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standard.
Reitsma JB; Rutjes AW; Khan KS; Coomarasamy A; Bossuyt PM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):797-806. PubMed ID: 19447581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic accuracy measures.
Eusebi P
Cerebrovasc Dis; 2013; 36(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 24135733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sample size calculation should be performed for design accuracy in diagnostic test studies.
Flahault A; Cadilhac M; Thomas G
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 58(8):859-62. PubMed ID: 16018921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A method is presented to plan the required sample size when estimating regression-based reference limits.
Bellera CA; Hanley JA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 60(6):610-5. PubMed ID: 17493520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence.
Martin JL; Williams KS; Abrams KR; Turner DA; Sutton AJ; Chapple C; Assassa RP; Shaw C; Cheater F
Health Technol Assess; 2006 Feb; 10(6):1-132, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16487456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies.
Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(3):517-40. PubMed ID: 19461821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives.
Brookes ST; Whitley E; Peters TJ; Mulheran PA; Egger M; Davey Smith G
Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(33):1-56. PubMed ID: 11701102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Association between compliance with methodological standards of diagnostic research and reported test accuracy: meta-analysis of focused assessment of US for trauma.
Stengel D; Bauwens K; Rademacher G; Mutze S; Ekkernkamp A
Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 15983072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
