These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31150837)

  • 21. Adjusting for partial verification or workup bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    de Groot JA; Dendukuri N; Janssen KJ; Reitsma JB; Brophy J; Joseph L; Bossuyt PM; Moons KG
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 175(8):847-53. PubMed ID: 22422923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sample sizes of studies on diagnostic accuracy: literature survey.
    Bachmann LM; Puhan MA; ter Riet G; Bossuyt PM
    BMJ; 2006 May; 332(7550):1127-9. PubMed ID: 16627488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The accuracy of physical diagnostic tests for assessing meniscal lesions of the knee: a meta-analysis.
    Scholten RJ; Devillé WL; Opstelten W; Bijl D; van der Plas CG; Bouter LM
    J Fam Pract; 2001 Nov; 50(11):938-44. PubMed ID: 11711009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Methodological bias and variation of systematic reviews on diagnostic test accuracy].
    Li ZX; Yang ZR; Xiang X; Gao P; Shu Z; Huang YS; Cao Y; Sun F; Zhan SY
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Feb; 37(2):286-90. PubMed ID: 26917532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. On the Incorrect Statistical Calculations of the Kinetica Software Package in Imbalanced Designs.
    Morales-Alcelay S; de la Torre de Alvarado JM; García-Arieta A
    AAPS J; 2015 Jul; 17(4):1033-4. PubMed ID: 25787313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sample size estimation in prevalence studies.
    Arya R; Antonisamy B; Kumar S
    Indian J Pediatr; 2012 Nov; 79(11):1482-8. PubMed ID: 22562262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.
    Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Lijmer JG; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC;
    Clin Radiol; 2003 Aug; 58(8):575-80. PubMed ID: 12887949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of diagnostic tests when there is no gold standard. A review of methods.
    Rutjes AW; Reitsma JB; Coomarasamy A; Khan KS; Bossuyt PM
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 Dec; 11(50):iii, ix-51. PubMed ID: 18021577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Meta-analysis: Problems with Russian Publications.
    Verbitskaya EV
    Int J Risk Saf Med; 2015; 27 Suppl 1():S89-90. PubMed ID: 26639728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy.
    Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Lijmer JG; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC;
    Clin Chem; 2003 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 12507953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. On Diagnostic Accuracy in Audiology: Central Site of Lesion and Central Auditory Processing Disorder Studies.
    Vermiglio AJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Feb; 27(2):141-56. PubMed ID: 26905533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prospective studies of diagnostic test accuracy when disease prevalence is low.
    Obuchowski NA; Zhou XH
    Biostatistics; 2002 Dec; 3(4):477-92. PubMed ID: 12933593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Interpreting diagnostic accuracy studies based on retrospective routinely collected data.
    Bradley SH; Shinkins B; Abel G; Callister MEJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Jun; 170():111359. PubMed ID: 38608789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical prediction models: diagnosis versus prognosis.
    van Smeden M; Reitsma JB; Riley RD; Collins GS; Moons KG
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Apr; 132():142-145. PubMed ID: 33775387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A potential for seamless designs in diagnostic research could be identified.
    Vach W; Bibiza E; Gerke O; Bossuyt PM; Friede T; Zapf A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Jan; 129():51-59. PubMed ID: 32991994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist.
    Salameh JP; Bossuyt PM; McGrath TA; Thombs BD; Hyde CJ; Macaskill P; Deeks JJ; Leeflang M; Korevaar DA; Whiting P; Takwoingi Y; Reitsma JB; Cohen JF; Frank RA; Hunt HA; Hooft L; Rutjes AWS; Willis BH; Gatsonis C; Levis B; Moher D; McInnes MDF
    BMJ; 2020 Aug; 370():m2632. PubMed ID: 32816740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An analysis reveals differences between pragmatic and explanatory diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Bossuyt PM; Olsen M; Hyde C; Cohen JF
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jan; 117():29-35. PubMed ID: 31561014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Validating pertussis data measures using electronic medical record data in Ontario, Canada 1986-2016.
    McBurney SH; Kwong JC; Brown KA; Rudzicz F; Chen B; Candido E; Crowcroft NS
    Vaccine X; 2023 Dec; 15():100408. PubMed ID: 38161988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.