128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31150955)
1. Lateralization of virtual sound sources with a binaural cochlear-implant sound coding strategy inspired by the medial olivocochlear reflex.
Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martín A; Fumero MJ; Stohl JS; Schatzer R; Nopp P; Wolford RD; Gorospe JM; Polo R; Revilla AG; Wilson BS
Hear Res; 2019 Aug; 379():103-116. PubMed ID: 31150955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech-in-Noise Recognition With More Realistic Implementations of a Binaural Cochlear-Implant Sound Coding Strategy Inspired by the Medial Olivocochlear Reflex.
Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martín A; Fumero MJ; Gorospe JM; Polo López R; Gutiérrez Revilla MA; Schatzer R; Nopp P; Stohl JS
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(6):1492-1510. PubMed ID: 33136626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intelligibility in speech maskers with a binaural cochlear implant sound coding strategy inspired by the contralateral medial olivocochlear reflex.
Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martín A; Stohl JS; Wolford RD; Schatzer R; Gorospe JM; Ruiz SSC; Benito F; Wilson BS
Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():134-137. PubMed ID: 28188882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Binaural Cochlear Implant Sound Coding Strategy Inspired by the Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Reflex.
Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martín A; Stohl JS; Wolford RD; Schatzer R; Wilson BS
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):e138-48. PubMed ID: 26862711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Objective speech transmission improvements with a binaural cochlear implant sound-coding strategy inspired by the contralateral medial olivocochlear reflex.
Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martín A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Apr; 143(4):2217. PubMed ID: 29716283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A state-of-the-art implementation of a binaural cochlear-implant sound coding strategy inspired by the medial olivocochlear reflex.
Fumero MJ; Eustaquio-Martín A; Gorospe JM; Polo López R; Gutiérrez Revilla MA; Lassaletta L; Schatzer R; Nopp P; Stohl JS; Lopez-Poveda EA
Hear Res; 2021 Sep; 409():108320. PubMed ID: 34348202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transmission of Binaural Cues by Bilateral Cochlear Implants: Examining the Impacts of Bilaterally Independent Spectral Peak-Picking, Pulse Timing, and Compression.
Gray WO; Mayo PG; Goupell MJ; Brown AD
Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211030411. PubMed ID: 34293981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Roles of the Contralateral Efferent Reflex in Hearing Demonstrated with Cochlear Implants.
Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martín A; Stohl JS; Wolford RD; Schatzer R; Wilson BS
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():105-114. PubMed ID: 27080651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lateralization of Interaural Level Differences with Multiple Electrode Stimulation in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
Stakhovskaya OA; Goupell MJ
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):e22-e38. PubMed ID: 27579987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Effect of Microphone Placement on Interaural Level Differences and Sound Localization Across the Horizontal Plane in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.
Jones HG; Kan A; Litovsky RY
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):e341-5. PubMed ID: 27054512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved interaural timing of acoustic nerve stimulation affects sound localization in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users.
Seebacher J; Franke-Trieger A; Weichbold V; Zorowka P; Stephan K
Hear Res; 2019 Jan; 371():19-27. PubMed ID: 30439571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sound-direction identification, interaural time delay discrimination, and speech intelligibility advantages in noise for a bilateral cochlear implant user.
Van Hoesel R; Ramsden R; Odriscoll M
Ear Hear; 2002 Apr; 23(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 11951849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Enhancement of interaural level differences for bilateral cochlear implant users.
Gajecki T; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2021 Sep; 409():108313. PubMed ID: 34340023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cortical Processing of Level Cues for Spatial Hearing is Impaired in Children with Prelingual Deafness Despite Early Bilateral Access to Sound.
Easwar V; Yamazaki H; Deighton M; Papsin B; Gordon K
Brain Topogr; 2018 Mar; 31(2):270-287. PubMed ID: 29119311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors.
Laback B; Pok SM; Baumgartner WD; Deutsch WA; Schmid K
Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):488-500. PubMed ID: 15599195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing sound localization deficits in bilateral cochlear-implant users and vocoder simulations with normal-hearing listeners.
Jones H; Kan A; Litovsky RY
Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25385244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Coherent Coding of Enhanced Interaural Cues Improves Sound Localization in Noise With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
Williges B; Jürgens T; Hu H; Dietz M
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518781746. PubMed ID: 29956589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sound source localization patterns and bilateral cochlear implants: Age at onset of deafness effects.
Anderson SR; Jocewicz R; Kan A; Zhu J; Tzeng S; Litovsky RY
PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0263516. PubMed ID: 35134072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Time-Varying Distortions of Binaural Information by Bilateral Hearing Aids: Effects of Nonlinear Frequency Compression.
Brown AD; Rodriguez FA; Portnuff CD; Goupell MJ; Tollin DJ
Trends Hear; 2016 Oct; 20():. PubMed ID: 27698258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]