These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31151004)

  • 1. Assessment of finite element models for prediction of osteoporotic fracture.
    Lee Y; Ogihara N; Lee T
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Sep; 97():312-320. PubMed ID: 31151004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient-specific finite element estimated femur strength as a predictor of the risk of hip fracture: the effect of methodological determinants.
    Qasim M; Farinella G; Zhang J; Li X; Yang L; Eastell R; Viceconti M
    Osteoporos Int; 2016 Sep; 27(9):2815-2822. PubMed ID: 27108118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical shape and appearance models for fast and automated estimation of proximal femur fracture load using 2D finite element models.
    Sarkalkan N; Waarsing JH; Bos PK; Weinans H; Zadpoor AA
    J Biomech; 2014 Sep; 47(12):3107-14. PubMed ID: 25052137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Low-dose and sparse sampling MDCT-based femoral bone strength prediction using finite element analysis.
    Rayudu NM; Anitha DP; Mei K; Zoffl F; Kopp FK; Sollmann N; Löffler MT; Kirschke JS; Noël PB; Subburaj K; Baum T
    Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Feb; 15(1):17. PubMed ID: 32088769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of proximal femur and vertebral body strength improvements in the FREEDOM trial using an alternative finite element methodology.
    Zysset P; Pahr D; Engelke K; Genant HK; McClung MR; Kendler DL; Recknor C; Kinzl M; Schwiedrzik J; Museyko O; Wang A; Libanati C
    Bone; 2015 Dec; 81():122-130. PubMed ID: 26141837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiple loading conditions analysis can improve the association between finite element bone strength estimates and proximal femur fractures: a preliminary study in elderly women.
    Falcinelli C; Schileo E; Balistreri L; Baruffaldi F; Bordini B; Viceconti M; Albisinni U; Ceccarelli F; Milandri L; Toni A; Taddei F
    Bone; 2014 Oct; 67():71-80. PubMed ID: 25014885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of proximal femur strength using a CT-based nonlinear finite element method: differences in predicted fracture load and site with changing load and boundary conditions.
    Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsumoto T; Ohashi S; Matsuyama J; Tobita K; Kaneko M; Nakamura K
    Bone; 2009 Aug; 45(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 19398043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How accurately can we predict the fracture load of the proximal femur using finite element models?
    van den Munckhof S; Zadpoor AA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Apr; 29(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 24485865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A preliminary dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-based finite element model for assessing osteoporotic hip fracture risk.
    Luo Y; Ferdous Z; Leslie WD
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Dec; 225(12):1188-95. PubMed ID: 22320058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of a model based on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and finite element simulation for predicting the probability of osteoporotic hip fractures to a sample of people over 60 years.
    López E; Casajús JA; Ibarz E; Gómez-Cabello A; Ara I; Vicente-Rodríguez G; Mateo J; Herrera A; Gracia L
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2015 May; 229(5):369-85. PubMed ID: 25963384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Image-based anatomical reconstruction and pharmaco-mediated bone remodeling model applied to a femur with subtrochanteric fracture: A subject-specific finite element study.
    Bahia MT; Hecke MB; Mercuri EGF
    Med Eng Phys; 2019 Jul; 69():58-71. PubMed ID: 31171487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of femoral strength using 3D finite element models reconstructed from DXA images: validation against experiments.
    Grassi L; Väänänen SP; Ristinmaa M; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2017 Jun; 16(3):989-1000. PubMed ID: 28004226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are CT-Based Finite Element Model Predictions of Femoral Bone Strength Clinically Useful?
    Viceconti M; Qasim M; Bhattacharya P; Li X
    Curr Osteoporos Rep; 2018 Jun; 16(3):216-223. PubMed ID: 29656377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proximal femoral bone geometry in osteoporotic hip fractures in Thailand.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2015 Jan; 98(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 25775736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Image-based finite-element modeling of the human femur.
    Falcinelli C; Whyne C
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2020 Nov; 23(14):1138-1161. PubMed ID: 32657148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Finite Element Assessment of Bone Fragility from Clinical Images.
    Schileo E; Taddei F
    Curr Osteoporos Rep; 2021 Dec; 19(6):688-698. PubMed ID: 34931294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. QCT of the proximal femur--which parameters should be measured to discriminate hip fracture?
    Museyko O; Bousson V; Adams J; Laredo J-; Engelke K
    Osteoporos Int; 2016 Mar; 27(3):1137-1147. PubMed ID: 26415934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Summary of AHRQ's comparative effectiveness review of treatment to prevent fractures in men and women with low bone density or osteoporosis: update of the 2007 report.
    Levis S; Theodore G
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2012 May; 18(4 Suppl B):S1-15; discussion S13. PubMed ID: 22716221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fracture Risk Indices From DXA-Based Finite Element Analysis Predict Incident Fractures Independently From FRAX: The Manitoba BMD Registry.
    Leslie WD; Luo Y; Yang S; Goertzen AL; Ahmed S; Delubac I; Lix LM
    J Clin Densitom; 2019; 22(3):338-345. PubMed ID: 30852033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of boundary and loading conditions on patient classification using finite element predicted risk of fracture.
    Altai Z; Qasim M; Li X; Viceconti M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Aug; 68():137-143. PubMed ID: 31202100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.