466 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31152199)
21. Design and rationale of the Impact of MultiPoint pacing in CRT patients with reduced RV-to-LV delay (IMAGE-CRT) study.
Solimene F; Nigro G; Canciello M; Tavoletta V; Shopova G; Calvanese R; Rago A; La Rosa C; Nappi F; Viscusi M; Urraro F; Manzo G; Gallo P; Andriani A; Rovaris G; Palmisano P; Innocenti S; D'Onofrio A
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2020 Mar; 21(3):250-258. PubMed ID: 32004245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Extending multipoint pacing CRT battery longevity by swapping left ventricular pulse configurations.
García Guerrero JJ; Fernández de la Concha Castañeda J; Chacón Piñero A; Hidalgo Martínez C; Badie N; McSpadden L; Ryu K
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2020 Apr; 57(3):481-487. PubMed ID: 32144679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Rationale and design of a randomized trial to assess the safety and efficacy of MultiPoint Pacing (MPP) in cardiac resynchronization therapy: The MPP Trial.
Tomassoni G; Baker J; Corbisiero R; Love C; Martin D; Sheppard R; Worley SJ; Lee K; Niazi I;
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol; 2017 Nov; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 28517367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Safety and Efficacy of Multipoint Pacing in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The MultiPoint Pacing Trial.
Niazi I; Baker J; Corbisiero R; Love C; Martin D; Sheppard R; Worley SJ; Varma N; Lee K; Tomassoni G;
JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Dec; 3(13):1510-1518. PubMed ID: 29759832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Haemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy using single-vein, three-pole, multipoint left ventricular pacing in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and a left ventricular free wall scar: the MAESTRO study.
Umar F; Taylor RJ; Stegemann B; Marshall H; Flannigan S; Lencioni M; De Bono J; Griffith M; Leyva F
Europace; 2016 Aug; 18(8):1227-34. PubMed ID: 26718535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cardiac resynchronization therapy when no lateral pacing option exists: vectorcardiographic guided non-lateral left ventricular lead placement predicts acute hemodynamic response.
Ross S; Odland HH; Aranda A; Edvardsen T; Gammelsrud LO; Haland TF; Cornelussen R; Hopp E; Kongsgaard E
Europace; 2018 Aug; 20(8):1294-1302. PubMed ID: 29036446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical outcome of left ventricular multipoint pacing versus conventional biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hu F; Zheng L; Ding L; Du Z; Liang E; Wu L; Chen G; Fan X; Yao Y; Jiang Y
Heart Fail Rev; 2018 Nov; 23(6):927-934. PubMed ID: 30209643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Response rate in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients implanted with a left ventricular quadripolar lead and the MultiPoint™ pacing feature early activated. QUARTO III.
Osca J; Francisco-Pascual J; Martínez-Basterra J; Martínez JG; Reis H; Oliveira M; Campos B; Balaguer J; Rubio J; Pavón-Jiménez R; Hernández J; Ormaetxe JM; Zamorano JL; Santamaría P; Alzueta J
Eur J Clin Invest; 2023 Apr; 53(4):e13935. PubMed ID: 36504276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Impact of Left Ventricular vs Biventricular Pacing on Reverse Remodelling: Insights From the Evaluation of Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure (EARTH) Trial.
Skaf S; Thibault B; Khairy P; O'Meara E; Fortier A; Vakulenko HV; Pitre C; White M; Ducharme A;
Can J Cardiol; 2017 Oct; 33(10):1274-1282. PubMed ID: 28941607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. COMPArison of Multi-Point Pacing and ConvenTional Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Through Noninvasive Hemodynamics Measurement: Short- and Long-Term Results of the COMPACT-MPP Study.
Passafaro F; Rapacciuolo A; Ruocco A; Ammirati G; Crispo S; Pasceri E; Santarpia G; Mauro C; Esposito G; Indolfi C; Curcio A
Am J Cardiol; 2024 Mar; 215():42-49. PubMed ID: 38237796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Estimation of the effects of multipoint pacing on battery longevity in routine clinical practice.
Akerström F; Narváez I; Puchol A; Pachón M; Martín-Sierra C; Rodríguez-Mañero M; Rodríguez-Padial L; Arias MA
Europace; 2018 Jul; 20(7):1161-1167. PubMed ID: 29036370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Clinical and economic impact of multipoint left ventricular pacing: A comparative analysis from the Italian registry on multipoint pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy (IRON-MPP).
Forleo GB; Santini L; Calò L; Ricciardi D; Curnis A; Pignalberi C; Calzolari V; Giammaria M; Morani G; Bertaglia E; Ribatti V; Biffi M; Potenza D; Piro A; Covino G; Natale V; Gasperetti A; Notarstefano P; Lavalle C; Nabutovsky Y; Tondo C; Zanon F
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 May; 31(5):1166-1174. PubMed ID: 32141116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Hemodynamic comparison of different multisites and multipoint pacing strategies in cardiac resynchronization therapies.
Zanon F; Marcantoni L; Baracca E; Pastore G; Giau G; Rigatelli G; Lanza D; Picariello C; Aggio S; Giatti S; Zuin M; Roncon L; Pacetta D; Noventa F; Prinzen FW
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2018 Oct; 53(1):31-39. PubMed ID: 29627954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain and mechanical dispersion predict response to multipoint pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Zhu M; Chen H; Fulati Z; Liu Y; Su Y; Shu X
J Clin Ultrasound; 2019 Jul; 47(6):356-365. PubMed ID: 30632611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Echocardiographic phase imaging to predict reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Buss SJ; Humpert PM; Bekeredjian R; Hardt SE; Zugck C; Schellberg D; Bauer A; Filusch A; Kuecherer H; Katus HA; Korosoglou G
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 May; 2(5):535-43. PubMed ID: 19442937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The impact of multipole pacing on left ventricular function in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy - A real-time three-dimensional echocardiography approach.
Weigand S; Karl M; Brkić A; Lennerz C; Grebmer C; Blažek P; Kornmayer M; Schaarschmidt C; Wesemann L; Reents T; Hessling G; Deisenhofer I; Kolb C
Int J Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 272():238-243. PubMed ID: 30121181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Reverse left ventricular remodeling is more likely in non ischemic cardiomyopathy patients upgraded to biventricular stimulation after chronic right ventricular pacing.
Morales MA; Startari U; Rossi G; Panchetti L; Rossi A; Piacenti M
Cardiovasc Ultrasound; 2011 Dec; 9():41. PubMed ID: 22177469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Left ventricular-only fusion pacing versus cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients: A randomized controlled trial.
Su Y; Hua W; Shen F; Zou J; Tang B; Chen K; Liang Y; He L; Zhou X; Zhang X; Lu H; Zhang S
Clin Cardiol; 2021 Sep; 44(9):1225-1232. PubMed ID: 34342026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An exploratory study on coronary sinus lead tip three-dimensional trajectory changes in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Tomasi C; Corsi C; Turco D; Severi S
Heart Rhythm; 2013 Sep; 10(9):1360-7. PubMed ID: 23851066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of multipoint pacing on projected battery longevity in cardiac resynchronization therapy. An IRON-MPP study sub-analysis.
Forleo GB; Gasperetti A; Ricciardi D; Curnis A; Bertaglia E; Calò L; Pignalberi C; Calzolari V; Ribatti V; Lavalle C; Potenza D; Tondi L; Natale V; Notarstefano P; Viecca M; Morani G; Biffi M; Giammaria M; Zanon F; Santini L
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Dec; 30(12):2885-2891. PubMed ID: 31661172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
