156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31152907)
1. Removal of Co, Sr and Cs ions from simulated radioactive wastewater by forward osmosis.
Liu X; Wu J; Hou LA; Wang J
Chemosphere; 2019 Oct; 232():87-95. PubMed ID: 31152907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sustainable water recovery from oily wastewater via forward osmosis-membrane distillation (FO-MD).
Zhang S; Wang P; Fu X; Chung TS
Water Res; 2014 Apr; 52():112-21. PubMed ID: 24463175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Water reclamation from emulsified oily wastewater via effective forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes under the PRO mode.
Han G; de Wit JS; Chung TS
Water Res; 2015 Sep; 81():54-63. PubMed ID: 26043371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment of radioactive wastewater using direct contact membrane distillation.
Liu H; Wang J
J Hazard Mater; 2013 Oct; 261():307-15. PubMed ID: 23959250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. FO/MD hybrid system for real dairy wastewater recycling.
Song H; Xie F; Chen W; Liu J
Environ Technol; 2018 Sep; 39(18):2411-2421. PubMed ID: 28929938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of temperature, pH, feed, and fertilizer draw solution concentrations on the performance of forward osmosis process for textile wastewater treatment.
Karunakaran A; Mungray AA; Garg MC
Water Environ Res; 2021 Oct; 93(10):2329-2340. PubMed ID: 34216398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Experimental study on the treatment of low level radioactive waste water by inorganic nanofiltration membrane].
Bai QZ; Chen HS; Ye YC; Li JF; Mu XF; Cao W
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2006 Jul; 27(7):1334-8. PubMed ID: 16881304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fatty acid fouling of forward osmosis membrane: Effects of pH, calcium, membrane orientation, initial permeate flux and foulant composition.
Zhao P; Gao B; Yue Q; Liu P; Shon HK
J Environ Sci (China); 2016 Aug; 46():55-62. PubMed ID: 27521936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reverse draw solute permeation in forward osmosis: modeling and experiments.
Phillip WA; Yong JS; Elimelech M
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jul; 44(13):5170-6. PubMed ID: 20527762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mitigation of bidirectional solute flux in forward osmosis via membrane surface coating of zwitterion functionalized carbon nanotubes.
Zou S; Smith ED; Lin S; Martin SM; He Z
Environ Int; 2019 Oct; 131():104970. PubMed ID: 31295643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigation on operational parameters and membrane fouling performance in treating synthetic aquaculture wastewater via forward osmosis with sucrose as draw solution.
Cheng X; Xu Y; Lei Z; Du J
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Nov; 847():157573. PubMed ID: 35882325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimized preparation route for polyamide top-coated forward osmosis membrane for enhanced water flux using industrial wastewater as feed.
Singh SK; Pandey A; Maiti A
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Jun; 31(27):39454-39480. PubMed ID: 38822176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Municipal wastewater treatment by forward osmosis using seawater concentrate as draw solution.
Yang S; Gao B; Jang A; Shon HK; Yue Q
Chemosphere; 2019 Dec; 237():124485. PubMed ID: 31394453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transport of trace organic compounds through novel forward osmosis membranes: Role of membrane properties and the draw solution.
Sauchelli M; Pellegrino G; D'Haese A; Rodríguez-Roda I; Gernjak W
Water Res; 2018 Sep; 141():65-73. PubMed ID: 29778066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of transmembrane hydraulic pressure on performance of forward osmosis membranes.
Coday BD; Heil DM; Xu P; Cath TY
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Mar; 47(5):2386-93. PubMed ID: 23363015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fabrication and performance of PET mesh enhanced cellulose acetate membranes for forward osmosis.
Li G; Wang J; Hou D; Bai Y; Liu H
J Environ Sci (China); 2016 Jul; 45():7-17. PubMed ID: 27372114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of feed solution chemistry on low pressure reverse osmosis filtration of cesium and strontium.
Ding S; Yang Y; Huang H; Liu H; Hou LA
J Hazard Mater; 2015 Aug; 294():27-34. PubMed ID: 25841084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Human and environmental factors affecting the activity of
Zannoni D; Cantaluppi C; Ceccotto F; Giacetti W; Lovisetto B
J Environ Radioact; 2019 Mar; 198():135-146. PubMed ID: 30605860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel corrugated wall channel module for external concentration polarization mitigation in forward osmosis process.
Zhang H; Shen C; Cui H; Yang F
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Nov; 25(32):32791-32801. PubMed ID: 30251040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Removal of organic micro-pollutants (phenol, aniline and nitrobenzene) via forward osmosis (FO) process: Evaluation of FO as an alternative method to reverse osmosis (RO).
Cui Y; Liu XY; Chung TS; Weber M; Staudt C; Maletzko C
Water Res; 2016 Mar; 91():104-14. PubMed ID: 26773492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
