These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31152995)

  • 1. Remote magnetic navigation versus manual control navigation for atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Jia K; Jin Q; Liu A; Wu L
    J Electrocardiol; 2019; 55():78-86. PubMed ID: 31152995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Remote magnetic with open-irrigated catheter vs. manual navigation for ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Proietti R; Pecoraro V; Di Biase L; Natale A; Santangeli P; Viecca M; Sagone A; Galli A; Moja L; Tagliabue L
    Europace; 2013 Sep; 15(9):1241-8. PubMed ID: 23585253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy and safety of remote magnetic catheter navigation vs. manual steerable sheath-guided ablation for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a case-control study.
    Koutalas E; Bertagnolli L; Sommer P; Richter S; Rolf S; Breithardt O; Bollmann A; Hindricks G; Arya A
    Europace; 2015 Feb; 17(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 25336662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiofrequency atrial fibrillation ablation with irrigated tip catheter using remote magnetic navigation compared with conventional manual method.
    Ghadban R; Gifft K; Luebbering Z; Sodhi S; Cooper D; Enezate T
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2021 Oct; 62(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 32959178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Remote magnetic navigation versus manual catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A single center long-term comparison.
    Schlögl S; Schlögl KS; Haarmann H; Bengel P; Bergau L; Rasenack E; Hasenfuss G; Zabel M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2022 Jan; 45(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 34687054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Remote magnetic versus manual catheter navigation for circumferential pulmonary vein ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation.
    Lüthje L; Vollmann D; Seegers J; Dorenkamp M; Sohns C; Hasenfuss G; Zabel M
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2011 Nov; 100(11):1003-11. PubMed ID: 21706198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term outcomes of the current remote magnetic catheter navigation technique for ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Yuan S; Holmqvist F; Kongstad O; Jensen SM; Wang L; Ljungström E; Hertervig E; Borgquist R
    Scand Cardiovasc J; 2017 Dec; 51(6):308-315. PubMed ID: 28958165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Remote-controlled magnetic pulmonary vein isolation using a new three-dimensional non-fluoroscopic navigation system: a single-centre prospective study.
    Da Costa A; Ben H'dech M; Romeyer-Bouchard C; Bisch L; Gate-Martinet A; Levallois M; Isaaz K
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2013; 106(8-9):423-32. PubMed ID: 23906679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Remote magnetic navigation vs. manual navigation for ablation of ventricular tachycardia: a meta-analysis.
    Wu Y; Li KL; Zheng J; Zhang CY; Liu XY; Cui ZM; Yu ZM; Wang RX; Wang W
    Neth Heart J; 2015 Sep; 23(10):485-490. PubMed ID: 26215291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Comparison of Remote Magnetic Irrigated Tip Ablation versus Manual Catheter Irrigated Tip Catheter Ablation With and Without Force Sensing Feedback.
    Weiss JP; May HT; Bair TL; Crandall BG; Cutler MJ; Day JD; Osborn JS; Mallender C; Bunch TJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Mar; 27 Suppl 1():S5-S10. PubMed ID: 26969224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Initial experience of a novel mapping system combined with remote magnetic navigation in the catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Lin C; Pehrson S; Jacobsen PK; Chen X
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1387-1392. PubMed ID: 28862806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feasibility and safety of remote-controlled magnetic navigation for ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Katsiyiannis WT; Melby DP; Matelski JL; Ervin VL; Laverence KL; Gornick CC
    Am J Cardiol; 2008 Dec; 102(12):1674-6. PubMed ID: 19064022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of atrial fibrillation ablation efficacy using remote magnetic navigation vs. manual navigation with contact-force control.
    Jez J; Jadczyk T; Lehar F; Pesl M; Kulik T; Belaskova S; Soucek F; Caluori G; Wojakowski W; Starek Z
    Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2020 Dec; 164(4):387-393. PubMed ID: 31645769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Remote magnetic catheter navigation for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in patients with common-type atrial flutter.
    Vollmann D; Lüthje L; Seegers J; Hasenfuss G; Zabel M
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2009 Dec; 2(6):603-10. PubMed ID: 20009074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Remote magnetic navigation facilitates the ablations of frequent ventricular premature complexes originating from the outflow tract and the valve annulus as compared to manual control navigation.
    Qiu X; Zhang N; Luo Q; Liu A; Ji Y; Ye J; Lin C; Ling T; Chen K; Pan W; Zhao J; Jin Q; Wu L
    Int J Cardiol; 2018 Sep; 267():94-99. PubMed ID: 29957265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Remote magnetic catheter navigation versus conventional ablation in atrial fibrillation ablation: Fluoroscopy reduction.
    Lim PCY; Toh JJH; Loh JKXY; Lee ECY; Chong DTT; Tan BY; Ho KL; Ching CK; Teo WS
    J Arrhythm; 2017 Jun; 33(3):167-171. PubMed ID: 28607610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Single-ring ablation compared with standard circumferential pulmonary vein isolation using remote magnetic catheter navigation.
    Sohns C; Bergau L; Seegers J; Lüthje L; Vollmann D; Zabel M
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2014 Oct; 41(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 24943245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A meta-analysis of manual versus remote magnetic navigation for ventricular tachycardia ablation.
    Turagam MK; Atkins D; Tung R; Mansour M; Ruskin J; Cheng J; Di Biase L; Natale A; Lakkireddy D
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2017 Sep; 49(3):227-235. PubMed ID: 28624892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy and Safety of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using Remote Magnetic Navigation: Experience from 1,006 Procedures.
    Jin QI; Pehrson S; Jacobsen PK; Chen XU
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Mar; 27 Suppl 1():S23-8. PubMed ID: 26969219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes of manual versus remote magnetic navigation for catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis.
    Blandino A; Bianchi F; Sibona Masi A; Mazzanti A; D'Ascenzo F; Grossi S; Musumeci G
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2021 Jun; 44(6):1102-1114. PubMed ID: 33825206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.