These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31152995)

  • 21. Does a patent foramen ovale matter when using a remote-controlled magnetic system for pulmonary vein isolation?
    Gate-Martinet A; Da Costa A; Romeyer-Bouchard C; Bisch L; Levallois M; Isaaz K
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2014 Feb; 107(2):88-95. PubMed ID: 24556188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Safety and Long-Term Outcomes of Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Using Magnetic Navigation versus Manual Conventional Ablation: A Propensity-Score Analysis.
    Adragão PP; Cavaco D; Ferreira AM; Costa FM; Parreira L; Carmo P; Morgado FB; Santos KR; Santos PG; Carvalho MS; Durazzo A; Marques H; Gonçalves PA; Raposo L; Mendes M
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Mar; 27 Suppl 1():S11-6. PubMed ID: 26969217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Atrial fibrillation ablation using remote magnetic navigation and the risk of atrial-esophageal fistula: international multicenter experience.
    Danon A; Shurrab M; Nair KM; Latcu DG; Arruda MS; Chen X; Szili-Torok T; Rossvol O; Wissner EE; Lashevsky I; Crystal E
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2015 Aug; 43(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 25935226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact of catheter ablation with remote magnetic navigation on procedural outcomes in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.
    Jin Q; Pehrson S; Jacobsen PK; Chen X
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2015 Nov; 44(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 26216480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Pulmonary vein anatomy predicts freedom from atrial fibrillation using remote magnetic navigation for circumferential pulmonary vein ablation.
    Sohns C; Sohns JM; Bergau L; Sossalla S; Vollmann D; Lüthje L; Staab W; Dorenkamp M; Harrison JL; O'Neill MD; Lotz J; Zabel M
    Europace; 2013 Aug; 15(8):1136-42. PubMed ID: 23512156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using remote magnetic catheter navigation: a case-control study.
    Arya A; Zaker-Shahrak R; Sommer P; Bollmann A; Wetzel U; Gaspar T; Richter S; Husser D; Piorkowski C; Hindricks G
    Europace; 2011 Jan; 13(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 21149511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of the Mid-Term Outcomes of Robotic Magnetic Navigation-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation versus Cryoballoon Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.
    Li X; Bao Y; Jia K; Zhang N; Lin C; Wei Y; Xie Y; Luo Q; Ling T; Chen K; Pan W; Wu L; Jin Q
    J Cardiovasc Dev Dis; 2022 Mar; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 35323637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Remote Magnetic versus Manual Navigation for Radiofrequency Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Long-Term, Controlled Data in a Large Cohort.
    Kataria V; Berte B; Vandekerckhove Y; Tavernier R; Duytschaever M
    Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():6323729. PubMed ID: 28386560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Utilization of steerable sheath improves the efficiency of atrial fibrillation ablation guided by robotic magnetic navigation compared with fixed-curve sheath.
    Luo Q; Xie Y; Bao Y; Wei Y; Lin C; Zhang N; Ling T; Chen K; Pan W; Wu L; Jin Q
    Clin Cardiol; 2022 May; 45(5):482-487. PubMed ID: 35195273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Long-term efficacy of single procedure remote magnetic catheter navigation for ablation of ischemic ventricular tachycardia: a retrospective study.
    Dinov B; Schönbauer R; Wojdyla-Hordynska A; Braunschweig F; Richter S; Altmann D; Sommer P; Gaspar T; Bollmann A; Wetzel U; Rolf S; Piorkowski C; Hindricks G; Arya A
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2012 May; 23(5):499-505. PubMed ID: 22313170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Multicenter, randomized comparison between magnetically navigated and manually guided radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (the MagMa-AVNRT-trial).
    Reents T; Jilek C; Schuster P; Nölker G; Koch-Büttner K; Ammar-Busch S; Semmler V; Bourier F; Kottmaier M; Kornmayer M; Brooks S; Fichtner S; Kolb C; Deisenhofer I; Hessling G
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 106(12):947-952. PubMed ID: 28849269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: Electrical modification suggesting transmurality is faster achieved with remote magnetic catheter in comparison with contact force use.
    Bun SS; Ayari A; Latcu DG; Errahmouni A; Saoudi N
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2017 Jul; 28(7):745-753. PubMed ID: 28419605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. General anesthesia is not superior to local anesthesia for remote magnetic ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Bun SS; Latcu DG; Allouche E; Errahmouni A; Saoudi N
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2015 Mar; 38(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 25353088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Robotically assisted ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Shurrab M; Danon A; Lashevsky I; Kiss A; Newman D; Szili-Torok T; Crystal E
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Nov; 169(3):157-65. PubMed ID: 24063921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Remote vs. conventional navigation for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: insights from prospective registry data.
    van den Bruck JH; Sultan A; Lüker J; Thomas D; Willems S; Weinmann K; Kuniss M; Hochadel M; Senges J; Andresen D; Brachmann J; Kuck KH; Tilz R; Steven D
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2019 Mar; 108(3):298-308. PubMed ID: 30159751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Procedural outcomes and learning curve of cardiac arrhythmias catheter ablation using remote magnetic navigation: Experience from a large-scale single-center study.
    Li X; Jin Q; Zhang N; Ling T; Lin C; Jia K; Bao Y; Xie Y; Wei Y; Chen K; Pan W; Xie Y; Wu L
    Clin Cardiol; 2020 Sep; 43(9):968-975. PubMed ID: 32453461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Early and long-term outcomes after manual and remote magnetic navigation-guided catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia.
    Qian P; De Silva K; Kumar S; Nadri F; Samanta R; Bhaskaran A; Ross D; Sivagangabalan G; Cooper M; Kizana E; Davis L; Denniss AR; Thiagalingam A; Thomas S; Kovoor P
    Europace; 2018 May; 20(suppl_2):ii11-ii21. PubMed ID: 29722861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of contact force and remote magnetic navigation on lesion formation for the ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Grossi S; Grassi F; Galleani L; Bianchi F; Conte MR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2018 May; 41(5):450-458. PubMed ID: 29405314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Efficacy of ganglionated plexi ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal versus persistent atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.
    Kampaktsis PN; Oikonomou EK; Y Choi D; Cheung JW
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2017 Dec; 50(3):253-260. PubMed ID: 28887742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Significant reduction in procedure duration in remote magnetic-guided catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using the third-generation magnetic navigation system.
    Maurer T; Sohns C; Deiss S; Rottner L; Wohlmuth P; Reißmann B; Heeger CH; Lemes C; Riedl J; Santoro F; Mathew S; Metzner A; Ouyang F; Kuck KH; Wissner E
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2017 Sep; 49(3):219-226. PubMed ID: 28600672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.