BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31153315)

  • 1. Binaural unmasking with temporal envelope and fine structure in listeners with cochlear implants.
    Todd AE; Goupell MJ; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 May; 145(5):2982. PubMed ID: 31153315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 28301390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cortical Correlates of Binaural Temporal Processing Deficits in Older Adults.
    Eddins AC; Eddins DA
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):594-604. PubMed ID: 29135686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.
    Gifford RH; Stecker GC
    Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107929. PubMed ID: 32182551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitivity to interaural envelope correlation changes in bilateral cochlear-implant users.
    Goupell MJ; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):335-49. PubMed ID: 25618064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Binaural speech unmasking and localization in noise with bilateral cochlear implants using envelope and fine-timing based strategies.
    van Hoesel R; Böhm M; Pesch J; Vandali A; Battmer RD; Lenarz T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):2249-63. PubMed ID: 18397030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial hearing benefits demonstrated with presentation of acoustic temporal fine structure cues in bilateral cochlear implant listeners.
    Churchill TH; Kan A; Goupell MJ; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1246. PubMed ID: 25190398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of different cochlear implant microphones on acoustic hearing individuals' binaural benefits for speech perception in noise.
    Aronoff JM; Freed DJ; Fisher LM; Pal I; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):468-84. PubMed ID: 21412155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effect of Interaural Mismatches on Contralateral Unmasking With Single-Sided Vocoders.
    Wess JM; Brungart DS; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):374-386. PubMed ID: 28002083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Binaural release from masking with single- and multi-electrode stimulation in children with cochlear implants.
    Todd AE; Goupell MJ; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):59. PubMed ID: 27475132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal Fine-Structure Coding and Lateralized Speech Perception in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Lőcsei G; Pedersen JH; Laugesen S; Santurette S; Dau T; MacDonald EN
    Trends Hear; 2016 Sep; 20():. PubMed ID: 27601071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants.
    van Hoesel RJ; Tyler RS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1617-30. PubMed ID: 12656396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of temporal fine structure and signal envelope on auditory motion perception.
    Warnecke M; Peng ZE; Litovsky RY
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0238125. PubMed ID: 32822439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of envelope modulations on binaural processing.
    Goupell MJ; Fong S; Stakhovskaya O
    Hear Res; 2019 Aug; 379():117-127. PubMed ID: 31154164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of interaural fluctuation rate on correlation change discrimination.
    Goupell MJ; Litovsky RY
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Feb; 15(1):115-29. PubMed ID: 24258458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Binaural Optimization of Cochlear Implants: Discarding Frequency Content Without Sacrificing Head-Shadow Benefit.
    Sheffield SW; Goupell MJ; Spencer NJ; Stakhovskaya OA; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):576-590. PubMed ID: 31436754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved interaural timing of acoustic nerve stimulation affects sound localization in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users.
    Seebacher J; Franke-Trieger A; Weichbold V; Zorowka P; Stephan K
    Hear Res; 2019 Jan; 371():19-27. PubMed ID: 30439571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of Spectral Resolution and Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Xu K; Willis S; Gopen Q; Fu QJ
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1362-1371. PubMed ID: 32132377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors.
    Laback B; Pok SM; Baumgartner WD; Deutsch WA; Schmid K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):488-500. PubMed ID: 15599195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.