These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31153343)

  • 1. Envelope regularity discrimination.
    Moore BCJ; Sęk AP; Vinay ; Füllgrabe C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 May; 145(5):2861. PubMed ID: 31153343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of age on envelope regularity discrimination.
    Moore BCJ; Vinay
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Aug; 146(2):1207. PubMed ID: 31472568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Air-Conducted Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults: Thresholds, Frequency Tuning, and Effects of Sound Exposure.
    Rodriguez AI; Thomas MLA; Janky KL
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):192-203. PubMed ID: 29870520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detectability of time-varying interaural correlation in narrow-band noise stimuli.
    Grantham DW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Oct; 72(4):1178-84. PubMed ID: 7142582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Binaural modulation masking.
    Grantham DW; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1340-9. PubMed ID: 2030221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal modulation transfer functions obtained using sinusoidal carriers with normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1067-73. PubMed ID: 11519575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychoacoustic equivalence of frequency modulation and quasi-frequency modulation.
    Edwards BW; Viemeister NF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1510-3. PubMed ID: 8176054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems.
    Firszt JB; Holden LK; Skinner MW; Tobey EA; Peterson A; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Wackym PA
    Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):375-87. PubMed ID: 15292777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modulation rate detection and discrimination by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW; Summers V; Leek MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Aug; 104(2 Pt 1):1051-60. PubMed ID: 9714924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of rate of change of frequency on the overall pitch of frequency-modulated tones.
    Gockel H; Moore BC; Carlyon RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Feb; 109(2):701-12. PubMed ID: 11248974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Critical modulation frequency based on detection of AM versus FM tones.
    Schorer E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Apr; 79(4):1054-7. PubMed ID: 3700860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modulation detection in subjects with relatively flat hearing losses.
    Bacon SP; Gleitman RM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Jun; 35(3):642-53. PubMed ID: 1608256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing the effects of age on amplitude modulation and frequency modulation detection.
    Wallaert N; Moore BC; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jun; 139(6):3088. PubMed ID: 27369130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modulation masking produced by beating modulators.
    Moore BC; Sek A; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Aug; 106(2):908-18. PubMed ID: 10462796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of carrier frequency, modulation rate, and modulation waveform on the detection of modulation and the discrimination of modulation type (amplitude modulation versus frequency modulation).
    Moore BC; Sek A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2468-78. PubMed ID: 7714263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of hearing loss, age, noise exposure, and listening skills on envelope regularity discrimination.
    Füllgrabe C; Fontan L; Vidal É; Massari H; Moore BCJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Oct; 154(4):2453-2461. PubMed ID: 37850836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New version of the TEN test with calibrations in dB HL.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):478-87. PubMed ID: 15599194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effective masking levels for 500 and 2000 Hz bone conduction auditory steady state responses in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Small SA; Smyth A; Leon G
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 24121647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability in Hearing Threshold Prediction in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Participants Using Mixed Multiple ASSR.
    Israelsson KE; Bogo R; Berninger E
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):299-310. PubMed ID: 25751697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The measurement of the lateralization of narrow bands of noise using an acoustic pointing paradigm: the effect of sound-pressure level.
    Simon HJ; Collins CC; Jampolsky A; Morledge DE; Yu J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1534-47. PubMed ID: 8176057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.