181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31153349)
1. The role of pitch and harmonic cancellation when listening to speech in harmonic background sounds.
Guest DR; Oxenham AJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 May; 145(5):3011. PubMed ID: 31153349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. No interaction between fundamental-frequency differences and spectral region when perceiving speech in a speech background.
Madsen SMK; Dau T; Oxenham AJ
PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249654. PubMed ID: 33826663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The intelligibility of speech in a harmonic masker varying in fundamental frequency contour, broadband temporal envelope, and spatial location.
Leclère T; Lavandier M; Deroche MLD
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():1-10. PubMed ID: 28390253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. No evidence for a benefit from masker harmonicity in the perception of speech in noise.
Steinmetzger K; Rosen S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Feb; 153(2):1064. PubMed ID: 36859153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: evidence for harmonic cancellation.
Deroche ML; Culling JF
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2855-65. PubMed ID: 22087914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A harmonic-cancellation-based model to predict speech intelligibility against a harmonic masker.
Prud'homme L; Lavandier M; Best V
J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Nov; 148(5):3246. PubMed ID: 33261378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigating the role of harmonic cancellation in speech-on-speech masking.
Prud'homme L; Lavandier M; Best V
Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108562. PubMed ID: 35768309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Phase effects in masking by harmonic complexes: speech recognition.
Deroche ML; Culling JF; Chatterjee M
Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 306():54-62. PubMed ID: 24076425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attentional modulation of the early cortical representation of speech signals in informational or energetic masking.
Zhang C; Lu L; Wu X; Li L
Brain Lang; 2014 Aug; 135():85-95. PubMed ID: 24992572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A dynamic binaural harmonic-cancellation model to predict speech intelligibility against a harmonic masker varying in intonation, temporal envelope, and location.
Prud'homme L; Lavandier M; Best V
Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108535. PubMed ID: 35654633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Developmental Effects in Children's Ability to Benefit From F0 Differences Between Target and Masker Speech.
Flaherty MM; Buss E; Leibold LJ
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):927-937. PubMed ID: 30334835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Masked Speech Perception Thresholds in Infants, Children, and Adults.
Leibold LJ; Yarnell Bonino A; Buss E
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 26783855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Musicians do not benefit from differences in fundamental frequency when listening to speech in competing speech backgrounds.
Madsen SMK; Whiteford KL; Oxenham AJ
Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):12624. PubMed ID: 28974705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of Masked Speech Detection Thresholds in 2- to 15-year-old Children: Speech-Shaped Noise and Two-Talker Speech Maskers.
Bonino AY; Ramsey ME; Pancoast ES; Vance EA
Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1712-1726. PubMed ID: 33928913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Roles of the target and masker fundamental frequencies in voice segregation.
Deroche ML; Culling JF; Chatterjee M; Limb CJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1225. PubMed ID: 25190396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: effect of masker type.
Deroche ML; Culling JF
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL465-70. PubMed ID: 24181992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
Summers V; Molis MR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
