236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31153497)
1. Particulate production during debonding of fixed appliances: Laboratory investigation and randomized clinical trial to assess the effect of using flash-free ceramic brackets.
Vig P; Atack NE; Sandy JR; Sherriff M; Ireland AJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jun; 155(6):767-778. PubMed ID: 31153497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Debonding and adhesive remnant cleanup: an in vitro comparison of bond quality, adhesive remnant cleanup, and orthodontic acceptance of a flash-free product.
Grünheid T; Sudit GN; Larson BE
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Oct; 37(5):497-502. PubMed ID: 25548144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Er:YAG Laser for Metal and Ceramic Bracket Debonding: An In Vitro Study on Intrapulpal Temperature, SEM, and EDS Analysis.
Grzech-Leśniak K; Matys J; Żmuda-Stawowiak D; Mroczka K; Dominiak M; Brugnera Junior A; Gruber R; Romanos GE; Sculean A
Photomed Laser Surg; 2018 Nov; 36(11):595-600. PubMed ID: 29905504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the debonding characteristics of two innovative ceramic bracket designs.
Bishara SE; Olsen ME; VonWald L; Jakobsen JR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 10393585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of adhesive flash-free brackets on debonding pain and time: A randomized split-mouth clinical trial.
Çokakoğlu S; Tan A
Angle Orthod; 2020 Nov; 90(6):758-765. PubMed ID: 33378510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The extent of enamel surface fractures. A quantitative comparison of thermally debonded ceramic and mechanically debonded metal brackets by energy dispersive micro- and image-analysis.
Stratmann U; Schaarschmidt K; Wegener H; Ehmer U
Eur J Orthod; 1996 Dec; 18(6):655-62. PubMed ID: 9009430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of debonding characteristics of a new collapsible ceramic bracket.
Bishara SE; Olsen ME; Von Wald L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Nov; 112(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 9387843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of Diode Laser Debonding of Ceramic Brackets on Enamel Surface and Pulpal Temperature.
Yassaei S; Soleimanian A; Nik ZE
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Apr; 16(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 26067728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative assessment of bonding time and 1-year bracket survival using flash-free and conventional adhesives for orthodontic bracket bonding: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.
Grünheid T; Larson BE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Nov; 154(5):621-628. PubMed ID: 30384932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enamel loss following ceramic bracket debonding: A quantitative analysis in vitro.
Suliman SN; Trojan TM; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A
Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):651-6. PubMed ID: 25264580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of different bonding and debonding techniques on debonding ceramic orthodontic brackets.
Sinha PK; Nanda RS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Aug; 112(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 9267223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Safe Debonding of Fixed Appliances: A Comparison of Traditional Techniques and LODI Devices on Different Bracket Types in Terms of Enamel Cracks, Site of Bond Failure, and Bracket Reusability.
Gibas-Stanek M; Pihut M
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Sep; 18(19):. PubMed ID: 34639565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An in vitro evaluation of a metal reinforced orthodontic ceramic bracket.
Mundstock KS; Sadowsky PL; Lacefield W; Bae S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Dec; 116(6):635-41. PubMed ID: 10587597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of different debonding techniques on the debonding forces and failure modes of ceramic brackets in simulated clinical set-ups.
Chen HY; Su MZ; Chang HF; Chen YJ; Lan WH; Lin CP
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):680-6. PubMed ID: 18005844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative analysis of enamel on debonded orthodontic brackets.
Cochrane NJ; Lo TWG; Adams GG; Schneider PM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Sep; 152(3):312-319. PubMed ID: 28863911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Enamel around orthodontic brackets coated with flash-free and conventional adhesives.
ElSherifa MT; Shamaa MS; Montasser MA
J Orofac Orthop; 2020 Nov; 81(6):419-426. PubMed ID: 32696069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does ultra-pulse CO(2) laser reduce the risk of enamel damage during debonding of ceramic brackets?
Ahrari F; Heravi F; Fekrazad R; Farzanegan F; Nakhaei S
Lasers Med Sci; 2012 May; 27(3):567-74. PubMed ID: 21667137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of shear bond strength and residual adhesive remnants on the enamel surface after debonding of three different orthodontic molar tubes : A scanning electron microscope study.
Öncel NA; Ulusoy N; Ulusoy C
J Orofac Orthop; 2024 May; 85(Suppl 1):94-101. PubMed ID: 37733249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index of metal APC™ Flash-Free adhesive system: A comparative in vitro study with APC™ II and uncoated metal brackets.
Akl R; Ghoubril J; Le Gall M; Shatila R; Philip-Alliez C
Int Orthod; 2022 Dec; 20(4):100705. PubMed ID: 36280583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of the different debonding strength of metal and ceramic brackets on the degree of enamel microcrack healing.
Nimplod P; Tansalarak R; Sornsuwan T
Dental Press J Orthod; 2021; 26(3):e2119177. PubMed ID: 34190770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
