242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31153497)
21. A comparative assessment of bracket survival and adhesive removal time using flash-free or conventional adhesive for orthodontic bracket bonding: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.
Grünheid T; Larson BE
Angle Orthod; 2019 Mar; 89(2):299-305. PubMed ID: 30230375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Microleakage under metallic and ceramic brackets bonded with orthodontic self-etching primer systems.
Uysal T; Ulker M; Ramoglu SI; Ertas H
Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1089-94. PubMed ID: 18947278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Ceramic bracket debonding: the evaluation of two debonding techniques and their effect on enamel.
Amditis C
Aust Orthod J; 1994 Mar; 13(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 7993241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of enamel surfaces after bracket debonding: an in-vivo study with scanning electron microscopy.
Alessandri Bonetti G; Zanarini M; Incerti Parenti S; Lattuca M; Marchionni S; Gatto MR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):696-702. PubMed ID: 22051490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An easily removable ceramic bracket?
Fox NA; McCabe JF
Br J Orthod; 1992 Nov; 19(4):305-9. PubMed ID: 1463706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of debonding characteristics of metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel: an in-vitro study.
Habibi M; Nik TH; Hooshmand T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):675-9. PubMed ID: 18005843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamel loss, and time requirements.
Krell KV; Courey JM; Bishara SE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Mar; 103(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 8456784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
Varlik SK; Ulusoy C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of failure characteristics and bond strength after ceramic and polycarbonate bracket debonding: effect of bracket base silanization.
Ozcan M; Finnema K; Ybema A
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 18209212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. In vitro evaluation of microleakage under ceramic and metal brackets bonded with LED and plasma arc curing.
Davari A; Yassaei S; Karandish M; Zarghami F
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 13(5):644-9. PubMed ID: 23250168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Performance of two laser motion modes versus conventional orthodontic ceramic brackets debonding technique on enamel surface topography.
Abdulaziz A; El-Kholy MM; Bushra SS; Ali SM; Shehab KA
Lasers Med Sci; 2024 Jun; 39(1):156. PubMed ID: 38869676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of a flash-free system on dental plaque accumulation and bonding-debonding process: A clinical study.
Yıldırım ZB; Ramoğlu Sİ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Jan; 163(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 36216622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of 445-nm Diode Laser-Assisted Debonding of Self-Ligating Ceramic Brackets on Shear Bond Strength.
Stein S; Hellak A; Schauseil M; Korbmacher-Steiner H; Braun A
Photomed Laser Surg; 2018 Jan; 36(1):31-36. PubMed ID: 29016236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of the debonding characteristics of 2 ceramic brackets: an in vitro study.
Theodorakopoulou LP; Sadowsky PL; Jacobson A; Lacefield W
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Mar; 125(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 15014410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The force levels required to mechanically debond ceramic brackets: an in vitro comparative study.
Arici S; Minors C
Eur J Orthod; 2000 Jun; 22(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 10920565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of the precrack preparation with an ultrasonic instrument on the ceramic bracket removal.
Chen YL; Chen HY; Chiang YC; Chang HH; Lin CP
J Formos Med Assoc; 2015 Aug; 114(8):704-9. PubMed ID: 23856344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Shear/peel bond strength of repositioned ceramic brackets.
Gaffey PG; Major PW; Glover K; Grace M; Koehler JR
Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(5):351-7. PubMed ID: 8526294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different conditioning methods.
Elekdag-Turk S; Isci D; Ozkalayci N; Turk T
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 19164413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Flash-free and conventional adhesive ceramic brackets in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Daraqel B; Yingying T; Zheng L
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Feb; 26(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 35506474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Interlayer formation and its effect on debonding polycrystalline alumina orthodontic brackets.
Sinha PK; Rohrer MD; Nanda RS; Brickman CD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Nov; 108(5):455-63. PubMed ID: 7484964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
