241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31153497)
41. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces.
Abu Alhaija ES; Abu AlReesh IA; AlWahadni AM
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 19903729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparison of shear bond strength of plastic and ceramic brackets.
Zielinski V; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Sep; 75(5):345-57. PubMed ID: 25158948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Debonding forces applied to ceramic brackets simulating clinical conditions.
Bishara SE; Forrseca JM; Fehr DE; Boyer DB
Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 7978522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Laser debonding of ceramic orthodontic brackets.
Tocchio RM; Williams PT; Mayer FJ; Standing KG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Feb; 103(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 8427220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Effect of different resin removal methods on enamel after metal and ceramic bracket debonding : An in vitro micro-computed tomography study.
Cesur E; Arslan C; Orhan AI; Bilecenoğlu B; Orhan K
J Orofac Orthop; 2022 May; 83(3):157-171. PubMed ID: 34165586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Plasma arc curing of ceramic brackets: an evaluation of shear bond strength and debonding characteristics.
Klocke A; Korbmacher HM; Huck LG; Ghosh J; Kahl-Nieke B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Sep; 124(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 12970665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Torsional bond strength and failure pattern of ceramic brackets bonded to composite resin laminate veneers.
Kao EC; Eliades T; Rezvan E; Johnston WM
Eur J Orthod; 1995 Dec; 17(6):533-40. PubMed ID: 8682171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparative evaluation of ceramic bracket base designs.
Bordeaux JM; Moore RN; Bagby MD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Jun; 105(6):552-60. PubMed ID: 8198079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The Use of the Er:YAG Laser for Bracket Debonding and Its Effect on Enamel Damage.
Dostalova T; Jelinkova H; Remes M; Šulc J; Němec M
Photomed Laser Surg; 2016 Sep; 34(9):394-9. PubMed ID: 27415584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Shear bond strength of two 2-step etch-and-rinse adhesives when bonding ceramic brackets to bovine enamel.
Godard M; Deuve B; Lopez I; Hippolyte MP; Barthélemi S
Int Orthod; 2017 Sep; 15(3):388-404. PubMed ID: 28755867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Bond strength and debonding characteristics of a new ceramic bracket.
Liu JK; Chung CH; Chang CY; Shieh DB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):761-5; quiz 802. PubMed ID: 16360918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Easy Debonding of Ceramic Brackets Bonded with a Light-Cured Orthodontic Adhesive Containing Microcapsules with a CO
Arima S; Namura Y; Tamura T; Shimizu N
Photomed Laser Surg; 2018 Mar; 36(3):162-168. PubMed ID: 29173028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets cemented with a zinc oxide-polyvinyl cement.
Martin S; Garcia-Godoy F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Dec; 106(6):615-20. PubMed ID: 7977207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Adhesive performance of precoated brackets after expiration.
Cloud CC; Trojan TM; Suliman SN; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A
Angle Orthod; 2016 Mar; 86(2):235-40. PubMed ID: 26172317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Evaluation of stresses developed in different bracket-cement-enamel systems using finite element analysis with in vitro bond strength tests.
Elsaka SE; Hammad SM; Ibrahim NF
Prog Orthod; 2014 Apr; 15(1):33. PubMed ID: 24934213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Enamel surface roughness evaluation after bracket debonding: Comparison between light cure and self cure adhesive resin 3-Dimensional profilometric study.
Chandrasekharan D; Sourabh C; Deenadayalan ; Praveen K
Indian J Dent Res; 2022; 33(1):80-84. PubMed ID: 35946250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Effect of surface treatments and flash-free adhesive on the shear bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets to CAD/CAM provisional materials.
Soliman TA; Ghorab S; Baeshen H
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):481-492. PubMed ID: 34605975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Bond strength: a comparison between chemical coated and mechanical interlock bases of ceramic and metal brackets.
Wang WN; Meng CL; Tarng TH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Apr; 111(4):374-81. PubMed ID: 9109582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Histologic investigation of the human pulp after thermodebonding of metal and ceramic brackets.
Jost-Brinkmann PG; Stein H; Miethke RR; Nakata M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Nov; 102(5):410-7. PubMed ID: 1476106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Ceramic bracket bonding: a comparison of shear, tensile, and torsional bond strengths of ceramic brackets.
Merrill SW; Oesterle LJ; Hermesch CB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Sep; 106(3):290-7. PubMed ID: 8074094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
