These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31153497)

  • 61. A comparative study of the debonding strengths of different ceramic brackets, enamel conditioners, and adhesives.
    Bishara SE; Fehr DE; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Aug; 104(2):170-9. PubMed ID: 8338070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Bond strengths and debonding characteristics of two types of polycrystalline ceramic brackets.
    Lemke K; Xu X; Hagan JL; Armbruster PC; Ballard RW
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 21175022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Effects of various debonding and adhesive clearance methods on enamel surface: an in vitro study.
    Fan XC; Chen L; Huang XF
    BMC Oral Health; 2017 Feb; 17(1):58. PubMed ID: 28241812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Microleakage under ceramic flash-free orthodontic brackets after thermal cycling.
    Kim J; Kanavakis G; Finkelman MD; Lee M
    Angle Orthod; 2016 Nov; 86(6):905-908. PubMed ID: 27182779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Assessment of chemical, ultrasonic, diode laser, and Er:YAG laser application on debonding of ceramic brackets.
    Khalil AS; Tamish NM; Elkalza AR
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Mar; 22(1):79. PubMed ID: 35305631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Reconditioning of ceramic orthodontic brackets with an Er,Cr:YSGG laser.
    Ahrari F; Fekrazad R; Kalhori KA; Ramtin M
    Lasers Med Sci; 2013 Jan; 28(1):223-8. PubMed ID: 22585379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Clinical comparison of an adhesive precoated vs. an uncoated ceramic bracket system.
    Verstrynge A; Ghesquiere A; Willems G
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2004 Feb; 7(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 14989750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Shear strength of ceramic brackets bonded to etched or unetched enamel.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Martin S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 19(3):181-3. PubMed ID: 8611486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Effectiveness of surface polishing after debonding of metal brackets from different CAD-CAM materials.
    Oz AZ; Oz AA; Ural C; Kaleli N; Duran İ
    J Orofac Orthop; 2024 May; 85(Suppl 1):19-26. PubMed ID: 36881111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Mechanical and electrothermal debonding: effect on ceramic veneers and dental pulp.
    Lee-Knight CT; Wylie SG; Major PW; Glover KE; Grace M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Sep; 112(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 9294354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Evaluation of the effects of CO2 laser on debonding of orthodontics porcelain brackets vs. the conventional method.
    Tehranchi A; Fekrazad R; Zafar M; Eslami B; Kalhori KA; Gutknecht N
    Lasers Med Sci; 2011 Sep; 26(5):563-7. PubMed ID: 20725757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Ceramic bracket debonding by Tm:YAP laser irradiation.
    Dostalova T; Jelinkova H; Sulc J; Nemec M; Jelinek M; Fibrich M; Michalik P; Miyagi M; Seydlova M
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2011 Jul; 29(7):477-84. PubMed ID: 21332377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Enamel cracks and ceramic bracket failure during debonding in vitro.
    Bishara SE; Ostby AW; Laffoon J; Warren JJ
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1078-83. PubMed ID: 18947289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Bonding and debonding characteristics of APC-plus clarity brackets compared to APC clarity brackets.
    Staribratova-Reister K; Jost-Brinkmann PG
    World J Orthod; 2004; 5(4):312-6. PubMed ID: 15633377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Physical and adhesive properties of dental enamel after radiotherapy and bonding of metal and ceramic brackets.
    Santin GC; Palma-Dibb RG; Romano FL; de Oliveira HF; Nelson Filho P; de Queiroz AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Aug; 148(2):283-92. PubMed ID: 26232837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Do Adhesive Flash-free Brackets Affect Bacterial Plaque in Patients with Adequate Oral Hygiene? A Randomised Controlled Clinical and Microbiological Assessment.
    Yetkiner E; Gürlek Ö; Işık A; Lappin DF; Buduneli N
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2019; 17(6):533-539. PubMed ID: 31825025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Loss of surface enamel after bracket debonding: an in-vivo and ex-vivo evaluation.
    Pont HB; Özcan M; Bagis B; Ren Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Oct; 138(4):387.e1-387.e9. PubMed ID: 20889035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Shear bond strength of metallic and ceramic brackets using color change adhesives.
    Stumpf Ade S; Bergmann C; Prietsch JR; Vicenzi J
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 23916435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. In vitro comparison of debonding force and intrapulpal temperature changes during ceramic orthodontic bracket removal using a carbon dioxide laser.
    Ma T; Marangoni RD; Flint W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Feb; 111(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 9057621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Debonding of ceramic brackets by a new scanning laser method.
    Oztoprak MO; Nalbantgil D; Erdem AS; Tozlu M; Arun T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 20691361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.