These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31153504)

  • 1. Factors associated with the beauty of soft-tissue profile.
    Ghorbanyjavadpour F; Rakhshan V
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jun; 155(6):832-843. PubMed ID: 31153504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anteroposterior and vertical soft tissue cephalometric norms of Iranians, interethnic comparisons, sex dimorphism, and the effect of age on cephalometric variables.
    Rakhshan V; Ghorbanyjavadpour F
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Jun; 23(2):167-178. PubMed ID: 30941649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Soft tissue cephalometric norms of Iranian Class I adults with good occlusions and balanced faces.
    Amini F; Razavian ZS; Rakhshan V
    Int Orthod; 2016 Mar; 14(1):108-22. PubMed ID: 26853371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, dentists, and plastic surgeons for balanced facial profiles.
    Milutinovic J; Aleksic E; Avramov S; Kalevski K; Gajic M; Pejanovic D; Milic J
    J Oral Sci; 2023 Mar; 65(2):73-76. PubMed ID: 36823034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Soft tissue profile in Anatolian Turkish adults: Part II. Comparison of different soft tissue analyses in the evaluation of beauty.
    Erbay EF; Caniklioğlu CM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Jan; 121(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 11786874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Soft and hard tissue changes of hyperdivergent class Ⅱ patients before and after orthodontic extraction treatment].
    Mao B; Tian Y; Wang X; Li J; Zhou Y
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2024 Feb; 56(1):111-119. PubMed ID: 38318905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Soft tissue profile in Anatolian Turkish adults: Part I. Evaluation of horizontal lip position using different soft tissue analyses.
    Erbay EF; Caniklioğlu CM; Erbay SK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Jan; 121(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 11786873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correlations between cephalometric and photographic measurements of facial attractiveness in Chinese and US patients after orthodontic treatment.
    Oh HS; Korn EL; Zhang X; Liu Y; Xu T; Boyd R; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):762.e1-14; discussion 762-3. PubMed ID: 19962590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors influencing attractiveness of soft tissue profile.
    Khosravanifard B; Rakhshan V; Raeesi E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Jan; 115(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 22858016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A comparative study of cephalometric evaluation criteria of the cutaneous profile].
    De Coster T
    Orthod Fr; 1991; 62 Pt 2():559-72. PubMed ID: 1749613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms in Chinese adults with esthetic facial profiles.
    Lew KK; Ho KK; Keng SB; Ho KH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1992 Nov; 50(11):1184-9; discussion 1189-90. PubMed ID: 1403274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of laterality on esthetic preferences of orthodontists, maxillofacial surgeons, and laypeople regarding the lip position and facial convexity: a psychometric clinical trial.
    Mousavi SM; Saeidi Ghorani P; Deilamani A; Rakhshan V
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Dec; 23(4):439-451. PubMed ID: 31446526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of facial profile characteristics of aesthetically pleasing Iranian faces.
    Esmaeili S; Mohammadi NM; Khosravani S; Eslamian L; Motamedian SR
    J World Fed Orthod; 2023 Apr; 12(2):76-89. PubMed ID: 36906490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile.
    Czarnecki ST; Nanda RS; Currier GF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Aug; 104(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 8338071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Cephalometric analysis of the soft tissue profile in Hunan Han adults with normal occlusion].
    Zhou S; Ou P; Yu M; Guo X; Shao C; He L; Su H
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Apr; 40(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 25931229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms in Yemeni men.
    Al-Gunaid T; Yamada K; Yamaki M; Saito I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):576.e7-14. PubMed ID: 18005826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A cephalometric investigation of horizontal lip position in adult Nigerians.
    Ikenna Isiekwe G; Olatokunbo DaCosta O; Chukwudi Isiekwe M
    J Orthod; 2012 Sep; 39(3):160-9. PubMed ID: 22984100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of facial components on the attractiveness of face: A perception-based study.
    Parul P; Kumar M; Goyal M; Mishra S; Shaha K; Abrar M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Nov; 162(5):e218-e229. PubMed ID: 36031510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Aesthetic evaluation of nasolabial angle alteration on the soft tissue profile of skeleton class I].
    Xu A; Deng F; Wang F; Zhang X; Zhang Y
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Oct; 33(5):492-6. PubMed ID: 26688942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcome of orthognathic surgery in Chinese patients. A subjective and objective evaluation.
    Chew MT; Sandham A; Soh J; Wong HB
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Sep; 77(5):845-50. PubMed ID: 17685780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.